Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of HPN-100, in Pediatric Subjects With Urea Cycle Disorders (UCDs)
A Switch-Over, Open-Label Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of HPN-100, Followed by Long-Term Treatment With HPN-100, in Pediatric Subjects Under 6 Years of Age With Urea Cycle Disorders (UCDs)
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
8
Brief Summary
This non-randomized, open-label study was approximately one year in duration and consisted of a short term NaPBA to HPN-100 switchover part involving two overnight stays followed by a 12-month long term treatment period involving monthly visits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jul 2011
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 28, 2015
CompletedJuly 11, 2024
June 1, 2024
1.6 years
April 29, 2011
April 3, 2015
June 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adverse Events
Rate of adverse events during the Switch-Over portion of the Protocol
2 weeks
Adverse Events
Rate of adverse events during the Safety Extension portion of the protocol ( please note: HPN-100 treatment only during Safety Extension )
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Blood Ammonia
2 weeks
Frequency of Ammonia Levels Greater Than the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) on HPN-100 Compared With NaPBA
2 weeks
Hyperammonemic Crisis
1 year
Study Arms (1)
HPN-100
EXPERIMENTALSwitch over from sodium phenylbutyrate to open label HPN-100 oral liquid over 10 days then open label, long term treatment for 12 months
Interventions
HPN-100 is a pro-drug of PAA that combines with glutamine to provide an alternative vehicle for waste nitrogen elimination. It is a liquid with minimal taste and odor. Approximately three teaspoons of HPN-100 (\~17.4 mL) delivers an equivalent amount as PBA that 40 tablets of NaPBA.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female subjects 29 days to \< 6 years old. If the subject is born prematurely, calculation of the lower age limit begins at the corrected gestational age of 40 weeks.
- Signed informed consent by the subject's legally acceptable representative
- Suspected or confirmed UCD diagnosis of any subtype, except NAGS deficiency
- On stable dose of NaPBA powder for at least 5 days before Day 1
- Not receiving sodium benzoate for at least 5 days before Day 1
- No concomitant illness which would preclude safe participation as judged by the investigator
- Able to receive medication orally
- Has not undergone liver transplantation, including hepatocellular transplantation
- Judged sufficiently stable and compliant with diet and treatment to be suitable for enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Screening ammonia level \> 100 μmol/L and signs and symptoms indicative of hyperammonemia; subjects may be rescreened after their ammonia is controlled and they are clinically stable, at the discretion of the investigator
- Use of any investigational drug within 30 days of Day 1
- Active infection (viral or bacterial) or any other condition that may increase ammonia levels
- Any clinical or laboratory abnormality of Grade 3 or greater severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03, except Grade 3 elevations in ammonia and liver enzymes, defined as levels 5-20 times ULN (upper limit of normal)in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) in a clinically stable subject
- Any clinical or laboratory abnormality or medical condition that, at the discretion of the investigator, may put the subject at increased risk by participating in this study
- Known hypersensitivity to PAA or PBA
- Liver transplant, including hepatocellular transplant
- Currently treated with Carbaglu® (carglumic acid)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Study Sites (8)
UCLA Pediatrics/Genetics
Los Angeles, California, 90404, United States
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04101, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (2)
Mokhtarani M, Diaz GA, Rhead W, Berry SA, Lichter-Konecki U, Feigenbaum A, Schulze A, Longo N, Bartley J, Berquist W, Gallagher R, Smith W, McCandless SE, Harding C, Rockey DC, Vierling JM, Mantry P, Ghabril M, Brown RS Jr, Dickinson K, Moors T, Norris C, Coakley D, Milikien DA, Nagamani SC, Lemons C, Lee B, Scharschmidt BF. Elevated phenylacetic acid levels do not correlate with adverse events in patients with urea cycle disorders or hepatic encephalopathy and can be predicted based on the plasma PAA to PAGN ratio. Mol Genet Metab. 2013 Dec;110(4):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.09.017. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
PMID: 24144944DERIVEDSmith W, Diaz GA, Lichter-Konecki U, Berry SA, Harding CO, McCandless SE, LeMons C, Mauney J, Dickinson K, Coakley DF, Moors T, Mokhtarani M, Scharschmidt BF, Lee B. Ammonia control in children ages 2 months through 5 years with urea cycle disorders: comparison of sodium phenylbutyrate and glycerol phenylbutyrate. J Pediatr. 2013 Jun;162(6):1228-34, 1234.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.084. Epub 2013 Jan 13.
PMID: 23324524DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The protocol was designed to capture information important for evaluating safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy while recognizing sampling limitations in young children and current standard of care.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Craig James R.N. Associate Dir. UCD Clinical Operations
- Organization
- Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
F MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2011
First Posted
May 4, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 11, 2024
Results First Posted
May 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors. If not approved, a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel will arbitrate and make the final decision. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.