The Laryngeal Tube Suction Versus Endotracheal Tube for Ventilation in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
The Laryngeal Tube Suction vs Endotracheal Tube for Ventilation in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study the investigators compare peak airway pressure (PAP), expire tidal volume (TV), end tidal CO2 (ETCO2), SpO2, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) after the insertion of laryngeal tube suction or endotracheal tube in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2011
CompletedMay 2, 2011
April 1, 2011
1.1 years
April 25, 2011
April 29, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
respiratory parameter
ETCO2, peak airway pressure and expired TV during operative period
1-3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
hemodynamic response
30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
laryngeal tube
EXPERIMENTALlaryngeal tube suction has suction port
endotracheal tube
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
laryngeal tube suction number 3 and 4
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- female age between 20-65 years
- ASA class 1-2
- elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery
- height \< 180 cm
- BMI \< 35 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- interincisor gap \< 2.5 cm
- risk of aspiration
- history of difficult intubation
- oropharyngeal pathology
- allergy to anesthetic drug
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Songklanagarind Hospital
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2011
First Posted
May 2, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 2, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-04