NCT01340014

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to assess patient preference regarding ocular comfort of AZARGA® compared to COSOPT® after one week instillation of each study medication.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
112

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 20, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 21, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 13, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

February 10, 2014

Status Verified

January 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

April 20, 2011

Results QC Date

October 18, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

GlaucomaIntraocular pressureTonometry, ocular

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Preferred Treatment

    The participant completed a questionnaire on the Day 15 visit (ie, after administration of both study medications) consisting of a single preference question: "Thinking about the comfort of the two medications (1st and 2nd) that you took during this study, which medication do you prefer?" Preferred treatment is presented as a percentage.

    At the end of both periods, Day 15

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Ocular Discomfort

    Day 7 of each period

Study Arms (2)

AZARGA/COSOPT

OTHER

1 drop AZARGA instilled in each eye twice a day for 7 days, followed by 1 drop COSOPT instilled in each eye twice a day for 7 days. A 48-hour washout period separated the two treatment periods.

Drug: Brinzolamide 1.0% + Timolol 0.5% ophthalmic suspensionDrug: Dorzolamide 2.0% + Timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution

COSOPT/AZARGA

OTHER

1 drop COSOPT instilled in each eye twice a day for 7 days, followed by 1 drop AZARGA instilled in each eye twice a day for 7 days. A 48-hour washout period separated the two treatment periods.

Drug: Brinzolamide 1.0% + Timolol 0.5% ophthalmic suspensionDrug: Dorzolamide 2.0% + Timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution

Interventions

Also known as: AZARGA®
AZARGA/COSOPTCOSOPT/AZARGA
Also known as: COSOPT®
AZARGA/COSOPTCOSOPT/AZARGA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of ocular hypertension, open-angle with or without pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion glaucoma in both eyes.
  • On a stable regimen of intraocular pressure-lowering (IOP) medication within 30 days of Screening Visit.
  • IOP considered safe (in the opinion of the Investigator) in both eyes in such a way that assures clinical stability of vision and the optic nerve throughout the study period.
  • IOP between 19 and 35 millimeters mercury (mmHg) in at least one eye (study eye).
  • Willing to discontinue the use of all other ocular drugs (prescribed and over-the-counter) prior to receiving the screening dose during the Screening Visit and for the entire course of the study.
  • Able to follow instructions and willing and able to attend all study visits.
  • Read, sign, and date an Ethics Committee reviewed and approved Informed Consent Form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known medical history of allergy, hypersensitivity or poor tolerance to any component of the preparations to be used in this study that is deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the Principal Investigator.
  • Best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/80 Snellen in either eye.
  • Any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry in either eye.
  • Intraocular conventional surgery or laser surgery in either eye less than 3 months prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Risk of visual field or visual acuity worsening as a consequence of participation in the study, in the Investigator's best judgment.
  • Progressive retinal or optic nerve disease from any cause.
  • History of ocular herpes simplex.
  • Severe allergic rhinitis or bronchial hypersensitivity that would preclude the safe administration of a topical beta-blocker.
  • Bronchial asthma, a history of bronchial asthma, or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that would preclude the safe administration of a topical beta-blocker.
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing potential and not using a reliable means of birth control.
  • Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to the Screening/baseline Visit.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open-AngleOcular HypertensionGlaucoma

Interventions

brinzolamideTimololAzargadorzolamideOphthalmic Solutionsdorzolamide-timolol combination

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsPropanolsAminesThiadiazolesThiazolesSulfur CompoundsAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsMorpholinesOxazinesPharmaceutical SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesSpecialty Uses of Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Doug Hubatsch, Global Brand Leader, Medical Affairs
Organization
Alcon Research, Ltd.

Study Officials

  • Severine Durier, Pharm.D

    Alcon Global Medical Affairs, Europe

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2011

First Posted

April 21, 2011

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2012

Study Completion

October 1, 2012

Last Updated

February 10, 2014

Results First Posted

December 13, 2013

Record last verified: 2014-01