Study Stopped
Not enough patients enrolling
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) by Array Comparative Genome Hybridization (CGH) and Blastocyst Biopsy
Comparison of Single Embryo Transfer With and Without Previous Analysis of All Chromosome Abnormalities Using Microarrays
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the effect of single embryo transfer (SET) with and without array CGH for the evaluation of the complete chromosome complement of the blastocyst. Patients will be allocated at random into two groups. The control group will consist of patients in which one embryo will be replaced on day 5 based on morphological and developmental characteristics, and the other embryos reaching blastocyst stage will be vitrified. The test group will consist of patients undergoing embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage (day 5 of development, embryo freezing, and analysis of the biopsied cells with a comprehensive chromosome analysis technique (array Comparative Genome hybridization or aCGH). Only a chromosomally normal blastocyst will be replaced in a thawed cycle. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in the study population section.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Apr 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedMay 30, 2012
May 1, 2012
1.3 years
April 7, 2011
May 25, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Implantation rate
number of embryos implanted divided by number of embryos replaced. An embryo implanted is measured as a fetal sac by ultrasound observation.
three weeks after embryo replacement
Secondary Outcomes (4)
miscarriage rate
up to the end of second trimester
Pregnancy rate per transfer
three weeks after implantation
Pregnancy rate per retrieval
three weeks after transfer
live birth rate
1 year after embryo transfer
Study Arms (2)
Test
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe test group will consist of patients undergoing blastocyst biopsy followed by vitrification (embryo freezing), and in which the biopsied cells will be analyzed with a comprehensive chromosome analysis technique (array Comparative Genome hybridization or aCGH) and only one chromosomally normal embryo will be replaced in a thawed cycle.
control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will consist of patients in which one embryo will be replaced on day 5 based on morphological and developmental characteristics, and the other embryos reaching blastocyst stage will be vitrified. If patient does not become pregnant, successive embryo transfers of frozen embryos will be performed, but not as part of the study.
Interventions
All embryos in the test group reaching blastocyst stage will undergo embryo biopsy of 3-10 trophectoderm cells. The cells will be analyzed by array CGH to detect the presence or not of chromosome abnormalities. The embryos will be vitrified and those classified by array CGH as normal, thawed for replacement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Couples with women 30-42 years of age
- Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level \<11IU/L on day 3 of cycle.
You may not qualify if:
- TESA and TESE patients
- Couples' carriers of chromosomal or genetic diseases
- Couples that produce less than eight antral follicles on day 2-4 of cycle
- Patients will be excluded if they produce no blastocysts by day 5
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Reprogeneticslead
- Reprogenetics Lationoamerica S.A.C, Lima, Perucollaborator
- Pranor S.R.L., Lima, Perucollaborator
- Yale Universitycollaborator
- McGill Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Pranor
Lima, Lima Province, Peru
Related Publications (3)
Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munne S. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):953-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
PMID: 20971462BACKGROUNDSchoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munne S, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
PMID: 19939370BACKGROUNDMunne S, Wells D, Cohen J. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):408-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.091. Epub 2009 May 5.
PMID: 19409550BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Santiago Munne, PhD
Reprogenetics
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2011
First Posted
April 11, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05