NCT01331174

Brief Summary

Study design: Randomized clinical trial. Objective: To evaluate the effect of PSW treatment in different doses and to compare to the control and placebo group. Background: Several forms of conservative treatment have been the focus of many recent studies in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Among these techniques, the application of pulsed short wave has been widely used, but the optimal dose and application time still have not been well established.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
121

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2006

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2006

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2008

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2008

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 5, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

November 27, 2012

Status Verified

November 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

April 5, 2011

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

kneeosteoarthritisphysical therapypulsed short wave

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain evaluation

    The patients were evaluated in 3 phases: initial evaluation (pre-treatment), immediately after post-treatment, and a 12-month follow up. An 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to measure pain during the last 2 days, where 0 corresponded to "no pain" and 10 corresponded to "worst imaginable pain".

    1 year follow up

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional evaluation

    1 year follow up

Study Arms (3)

High dose PSW groups

EXPERIMENTAL

The treatment was performed with 2 devices named Diatermed II (Carci, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), previously calibrated, carrying frequency of 27.12MHz, peak power of 250W, and pulse duration of 400µs. All these parameters are predetermined in the device according to the manufacturer. We used the maximum power provided by the machine in a pulsed form with a pulse frequency of 145Hz, resulting in a mean power of 14.5W. These settings were based on the fact that applications with mean power below 20W minimize the thermal effects

Device: Pulsed short wave

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

A placebo group was also established, in which the PSW device was turned on but kept in stand-by mode during 19 minutes without any electrical current being applied in the patients

Device: Pulsed short wave

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group was composed of patients that were not submitted to any form of treatment and all patients were instructed to maintain their daily activities

Interventions

The treatment was performed with 2 devices named Diatermed II (Carci, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), previously calibrated, carrying frequency of 27.12MHz, peak power of 250W, and pulse duration of 400µs. All these parameters are predetermined in the device according to the manufacturer. We used the maximum power provided by the machine in a pulsed form with a pulse frequency of 145Hz, resulting in a mean power of 14.5W.

High dose PSW groupsPlacebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The female subjects were included if they were over 40 with knee primary grade II or III OA, based on Gupta et al radiographic criteria2, and joint or anterior knee pain for at least 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • We excluded patients with a history of surgery or any invasive procedure of the affected knee, physical therapy for knee injuries or any medication that had changed in the last 3 months, other diseases changing function, and patients who presented any contraindication for PSW application, especially metallic implants, pacemakers, lack of sensitivity, or tumor.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Fukuda TY, Ovanessian V, Alves da Cunha R, Jacob Filho Z, Cazarini Jr C, Rienzo FA, Centini AA. Pulsed Short Wave Effect in Pain and Function in patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. JARCET. 2008; 8(3):189-98.

    RESULT
  • Fukuda TY, Alves da Cunha R, Fukuda VO, Rienzo FA, Cazarini C Jr, Carvalho Nde A, Centini AA. Pulsed shortwave treatment in women with knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2011 Jul;91(7):1009-17. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100306. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic DiseaseOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteoarthritis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Thiago Y Fukuda, PhD

    Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2011

First Posted

April 7, 2011

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion

March 1, 2008

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Last Updated

November 27, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-11