NCT01330290

Brief Summary

The study objective is to evaluate advantages and disadvantages of Neupro® versus oral anti-Parkinson medication by caregivers and physicians in idiopathic Parkinson's Disease patients requiring caregiver support in nursing home or outpatient care settings.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
148

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

54 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2011

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2011

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2011

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 10, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2013

Status Verified

November 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

March 18, 2011

Results QC Date

July 19, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 7, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

RotigotineNeupro®ParkinsonTreatment preferenceCare-giving

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mean Score of the Caregivers' Rating of Neupro® Compared to Oral Anti-Parkinson Medication

    The caregivers were asked to fill out a questionnaire composed of 7 questions covering caregiving aspects. The mean score is calculated from the scores for the single responses which are rated from 'great disadvantages' to 'great advantages' and scored on a 5-point scale from -2 to +2. Each caregiver could have assessed one or multiple participants. The scores from each caregiver were averaged over all participants they assessed, and the final mean score was calculated from the averaged assessments of the caregivers.

    Questionnaire completed at a single time-point during the run of the cross-sectional study (16 months). Suitable patients suffer from idiopathic iPD treated with a combination of l-dopa or another oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month.

  • Mean Score of the Physicians' Rating of Neupro® Compared to Oral Anti-Parkinson Medication

    The physicians were asked to fill out a questionnaire composed of 10 questions covering medical and caregiving aspects. The mean score is calculated from the scores for the single responses which are rated from 'great disadvantages' to 'great advantages' and scored on a 5-point scale from -2 to +2. Each physician could have assessed one or multiple participants. The scores from each physician were averaged over all participants they assessed, and the final mean score was calculated from the averaged assessments of the physicians.

    Questionnaire completed at a single time-point during the run of the cross-sectional study (16 months). Suitable patients suffer from idiopathic iPD treated with a combination of l-dopa or another oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month.

Secondary Outcomes (19)

  • Assessment of the Physicians' Rationale for the Choice of Neupro® Due to Substance in Idiopathic Parkinsons Disease Patients Requiring Caregiver Support

    Questionnaire completed at a single time-point during the run of the cross-sectional study (16 months). Suitable patients suffer from idiopathic iPD treated with a combination of l-dopa or another oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month.

  • Assessment of the Physicians' Rationale for the Choice of Neupro® Due to Application Form in Idiopathic Parkinsons Disease Patients Requiring Caregiver Support

    Questionnaire completed at a single time-point during the run of the cross-sectional study (16 months). Suitable patients suffer from idiopathic iPD treated with a combination of l-dopa or another oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month.

  • Score for the Physicians' Rating of Neupro® Compared to Oral Anti-Parkinson Medication in Relation to Dysphagia in Patients With Dysphagia

    Questionnaire completed at a single time-point during the run of the cross-sectional study (16 months). Suitable patients suffer from idiopathic iPD treated with a combination of l-dopa or another oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month.

  • Score for the Physicians' Rating of Neupro® Compared to Oral Anti-Parkinson Medication in Relation to Nausea and/or Vomiting in Patients With Nausea and/or Vomiting.

    Questionnaire completed at a single time-point during the run of the cross-sectional study (16 months). Suitable patients suffer from idiopathic iPD treated with a combination of l-dopa or another oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month.

  • Score for the Physicians' Rating of Neupro® Compared to Oral Anti-Parkinson Medication in Relation to Control of Compliance

    Questionnaire completed at a single time-point during the run of the cross-sectional study (16 months). Suitable patients suffer from idiopathic iPD treated with a combination of l-dopa or another oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month.

  • +14 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Neupro® Treatment

Routine treatment (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 mg/24 hours) as per approved label in European Union (EU)/in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization for Neupro®

Drug: Neupro®

Interventions

Neupro patches were prescribed by the treating physician according to the Summary of the Product Characteristics. Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (iPD) were treated for at least 1 month with a combination of Levodopa (L-DOPA) or other oral iPD medication and Neupro by the time the questionnaire was completed.

Also known as: Rotigotine
Neupro® Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (iPD) patients treated with a combination of L-dopa or other oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month and requiring caregiver support documented as per medical records Every consecutive, eligible patient to be treated with Neupro® as per physician's decision

You may qualify if:

  • Only patients having signed the consent form regarding study information, data transfer and data use
  • The patients suffer from idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (iPD) treated with a combination of L-dopa or another oral iPD drug and Neupro® for at least one month
  • The patients require caregiver support documented as per medical records (e.g. based on German level of care intensity 1 or greater)
  • The decision to prescribe Neupro® must have been made by the physician independent of his/her decision to include the patient in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • And according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC): Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients, magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) or cardioversion

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (54)

52

Abensberg, Germany

Location

53

Alzenau in Unterfranken, Germany

Location

18

Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany

Location

42

Bensheim, Germany

Location

24

Berlin, Germany

Location

27

Berlin, Germany

Location

37

Celle, Germany

Location

58

Cologne, Germany

Location

17

Dillingen, Germany

Location

48

Dresden, Germany

Location

32

Eisenach, Germany

Location

39

Erbach im Odenwald, Germany

Location

43

Erfurt, Germany

Location

60

Essen, Germany

Location

5

Gelnhausen, Germany

Location

40

Gelsenkirchen, Germany

Location

31

Göttingen, Germany

Location

38

Guelders, Germany

Location

29

Hagen, Germany

Location

57

Halle, Germany

Location

6

Halle, Germany

Location

28

Hamm, Germany

Location

47

Hanover, Germany

Location

7

Herborn, Germany

Location

55

Hoppegarten, Germany

Location

59

Jena, Germany

Location

50

Karlstadt am Main, Germany

Location

44

Königsbrück, Germany

Location

51

Lappersdorf, Germany

Location

8

Lohr, Germany

Location

4

Marktheidenfeld, Germany

Location

45

Merzig, Germany

Location

36

Minden, Germany

Location

34

Mittweida, Germany

Location

35

Mühldorf, Germany

Location

25

München, Germany

Location

41

München, Germany

Location

30

Münster, Germany

Location

49

Neuburg am Inn, Germany

Location

21

Neumarkt, Germany

Location

13

Niederschöna, Germany

Location

9

Oschatz, Germany

Location

54

Schorndorf, Germany

Location

2

Schriesheim, Germany

Location

1

Stralsund, Germany

Location

12

Stratroda, Germany

Location

15

Stuttgard, Germany

Location

33

Stuttgart, Germany

Location

20

Ulm, Germany

Location

14

Unterhaching, Germany

Location

22

Weil am Rhein, Germany

Location

11

Westerstede, Germany

Location

23

Wolfach, Germany

Location

56

Wolfratshausen, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Sieb JP, Themann P, Warnecke T, Lauterbach T, Berkels R, Grieger F, Lorenzl S. Caregivers' and physicians' attitudes to rotigotine transdermal patch versus oral Parkinson's disease medication: an observational study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 May;31(5):967-74. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1030376.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Interventions

rotigotine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
UCB Clinical Trials Call Center
Organization
UCB

Study Officials

  • UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

    +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2011

First Posted

April 6, 2011

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

December 10, 2013

Results First Posted

December 10, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-11

Locations