NCT01328405

Brief Summary

Introduction: The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. A unique feature of this device as compared to other airways on the market is the size of the inner diameter (ID) and length of its airway tube. Direct placement of tracheal tubes \> 7.5 mm ID through the airway tube is possible. The ProSealTM LMA is considered the gold standard for supraglottic devices with respect to airway seal pressure. On average, it is reported to be approximately 28 cmH2O. This is significantly higher than that of the first generation LMA, the LMA-ClassicTM, which has a maximum seal pressure of 20 cmH2O, but averages 16-18 cmH2O in actual practice. In this study the investigators aim to test whether the air-QⓇ creates an airway seal pressure that is similar to the LMA-ProSealTM, whether the position of the air-QⓇ in relation to the vocal cords, as assessed by fiberoptic endoscopy, is similar to that of the LMA-ProSealTM and whether airway morbidity is similar between the air-QⓇ and the LMA-ProSealTM.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2010

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 29, 2011

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2011

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 10, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2015

Status Verified

July 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

March 29, 2011

Results QC Date

July 2, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Airway Seal Pressure

    The airway seal pressure will then be assessed by closing the APL valve on the anesthesia machine with a fresh gas flow of 5 liters/minute until an audible leak is observed.

    Intraoperative (day 1)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Grossly Visible Blood or Bile on LMA

    Upon LMA removal

  • Glottic View

    Intraoperative (day 1)

  • Airway Pathology

    Postoperative (day 1) in recovery room

  • Airway Pathology

    Postoperative Day Two

Study Arms (2)

Air-Q LMA

EXPERIMENTAL

Air-QⓇ intubating laryngeal mask (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, Fl.)

Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)

Proseal LMA

EXPERIMENTAL

LMA-Proseal TM (LMA North America, San Diego, Ca.)

Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)

Interventions

Comparison of airway seal pressure, airway morbidity bronchoscopic view obtained between two different laryngeal mask airways.

Also known as: Air-QⓇ intubating laryngeal mask(Mercury Medical,Clearwater, Fl.), LMA-Proseal TM(LMA North America,San Diego, Ca.)
Air-Q LMAProseal LMA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who are 18 years or greater may be included if they presenting for any elective surgery or procedure to take place in any anesthetic location and require placement of a LMA for their surgery or procedure.

You may not qualify if:

  • non-English speaking
  • pregnant
  • are a minor
  • are a prisoner
  • have impaired decision-making capacity or any condition for which the primary anesthesia team deems intubation with a tracheal tube to be necessary

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Aug-Sep;52(7):739-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03016565.

    PMID: 16103390BACKGROUND
  • Wong DT, McGuire GP. Endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask/supraglottic airway. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;54(6):489-91; author reply 491. doi: 10.1007/BF03022042. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17541083BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Laryngeal Masks

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intubation, IntratrachealAirway ManagementTherapeuticsIntubationInvestigative TechniquesMasksProtective DevicesEquipment and SuppliesPersonal Protective EquipmentManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Kristopher Schroeder
Organization
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Kristopher M Schroeder, MD

    University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Department of Anesthesiology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2011

First Posted

April 4, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion

April 1, 2010

Study Completion

April 1, 2010

Last Updated

October 23, 2015

Results First Posted

August 10, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-07

Locations