Home Care Medication Management Program for the Frail Elderly
2 other identifiers
interventional
414
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a home care medication management program which includes nurse coordination and use of the MD.2 medication-dispensing machine will affect older adults' health outcomes, satisfaction, use of health care services, and health care costs over a one year period. The investigators propose a longitudinal three group repeated measures design, enrolling, and randomly assigning, clients who are discharged from a home health care agency with documented problems in medication management. One group will receive the MD.2 medication dispensing device and nurse coordination, the second group will receive a Medplanner: a simple box that has separate compartments for individual medication times over the course of a week plus nurse coordination, and the final group will receive Usual Care. The study hypotheses are the following: H1: With respect to health status outcomes, the MD.2 group will exhibit a more positive trajectory in physical and mental health status, functional status, cognitive status and depressive symptoms over the course of a year than will the Medplanner Group. H2: With respect to health status outcomes, the Medplanner Group will exhibit a more positive trajectory in physical and mental health status, functional status, cognitive status and depressive symptoms over the course of a year than will the Usual Care Group. H3: The rate of hospitalization, hospital days and emergency department visits will be significantly lower for the MD.2 Group as compared to the Medplanner Group. H4: The rate of hospitalization, hospital days and emergency department visits will be significantly lower for the Medplanner Group as compared to the Usual Care Group. H5: The nursing home admission rate will be significantly lower for the MD.2 Group as compared to the Medplanner Group. H6: The nursing home admission rate will be significantly lower for the Medplanner Group as compared to the Usual Care Group. H7: The total cost of care will be significantly lower for the MD.2 Group as compared to the Medplanner Group. H8: The total cost of care will be significantly lower for the Medplanner Group as compared to The Usual Care Group. H9: There will be incremental savings in terms of costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained in the MD.2 group compared with the Medplanner Group. H10: There will be incremental savings in terms of costs per QALY gained in the Medplanner group compared with the Usual Care Group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started May 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2011
CompletedJanuary 6, 2012
January 1, 2012
4 years
March 15, 2011
January 4, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Geriatric Depression Scale
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) was developed to identify depression in older adults. The original GDS was 30 questions, however, fifteen- and five-question versions also exist. When tested on the oldest old in the community, the 15-item scale was demonstrated to have favorable reliability and validity results. Impaired cognitive function (MMSE \< 28) reduced the tool's specificity, but sensitivity was not affected by lower MMSE scores. The tool is scored into depression categories of "none/mild", "moderate" and "major".
12 months
Physical Performance Test (PPT)
This functional status test has demonstrated reliability and validity, is easy to administer, can be performed in a reasonable period of time, and imposes little burden on the individual being tested. Even men and women with mild to moderate dementia are capable of understanding the test and performing activities reliably. There are 7 items on the test that range in difficulty from very easy to perform (writing a sentence) to challenging (picking up a penny), thus encompassing a spectrum of physical capabilities.
12 months
SF-36 Health Survey
This tool is a widely used generic health status questionnaire measuring eight dimensions of health status: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perceptions. In addition, the SF-36 can be transformed into a Health State Utility Index that allows for health improvements to be stated in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.
12 months
Mental Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
This 11-item measure screens for cognitive abilities in the domains of orientation, memory, attention, recall, language and visual/spatial orientation. The MMSE may be a categorical or continuous-level variable. When used as a categorical variable, the MMSE is broken down into 4 levels: (a) score range 24-30 is considered within normal limits (WNL), (b) score range of 18-23 is considered mild cognitive impairment, (c) score range of 12-17 is considered moderate cognitive impairment, and (d) a score range of 11 or less is considered to be severe cognitive impairment.
12 months
Hospitalization
Medicare claims data will be the source of information for this measure.
12 month enrollment period
Hospital Days
Medicare claims data will be the source of information for this measure.
12 Month Enrollment Period
Emergency Department Visits
Medicare claims data will be the source of information for this measure.
12 month Enrollment Period
Medicare Costs
Medicare claims data will be the source of information for this measure.
12 Month Enrollment Period
Study Arms (3)
Machine and NCC
EXPERIMENTALMedications dispensed to subject via MD2 machine and nurse care coordination used to coordinate care among providers and fill machine at least every 2 weeks.
Medplanner and NCC
EXPERIMENTALMedications loaded in medplanner by nurse care coordinator who coordinates care among providers and visits subject at least every 2 weeks
Usual Care Group
NO INTERVENTIONAdmitted post home health care with no intervention.
Interventions
MD2 machine filled at least every 2 weeks and subjects monitored for changes in condition. Additional visits made as needed. Care is coordinated with other providers such as the primary care physician and pharmacist.
Medications are dispensed via a medplanner filled by a nurse at least every 2 weeks and subjects monitored for changes in condition. Additional visits made as needed. Care is coordinated with other providers such as the primary care physician and pharmacist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 60 and older
- Medicare Primary Payer
- Impaired Medication Management ability as indicated by a score of 1 or higher on OASIS discharge assessment item M0780
- Impaired Cognitive Functioning but able to follow directions with prompting as indicated by a score of 1 or 2 on OASIS discharge assessment item M0560
- working telephone line
- Discharge from home health care
You may not qualify if:
- Not English speaking
- Terminal diagnosis or hospice care
- Use of other device for medications
- Medicare via managed care
- Use of private home care agency for medication management
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Arizona State Universitylead
- University of Wisconsin, Milwaukeecollaborator
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201, United States
Related Publications (1)
Marek KD, Stetzer F, Ryan PA, Bub LD, Adams SJ, Schlidt A, Lancaster R, O'Brien AM. Nurse care coordination and technology effects on health status of frail older adults via enhanced self-management of medication: randomized clinical trial to test efficacy. Nurs Res. 2013 Jul-Aug;62(4):269-78. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318298aa55.
PMID: 23817284DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karen S Marek, PhD
Arizona State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2011
First Posted
March 24, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2006
Primary Completion
May 1, 2010
Study Completion
May 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 6, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-01