Exercise and Muscle Stimulation in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on Knee Osteoarthritis(OA): an Equivalence Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
19
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises in patients with knee OA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2011
CompletedMarch 23, 2011
March 1, 2011
2 months
March 22, 2011
March 22, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of the flexibility of the posterior chain muscles
We only observed a significant improvement in the flexibility of the posterior muscle chain for the CKC + NMES group during the initial evaluation compared to the partial evaluation (p=0.012), the partial evaluation compared to the final evaluation (p=0.035) and the initial evaluation compared to the final evaluation (p=0.008). Regarding the scale that was used to classify the level of flexibility, 10% of the subjects in the CKC + NMES group were initially classified as good/excellent. At the end of the protocol, 60% of the subjects were classified as good/excellent (p=0.015)
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Closed Kinetic Chain and NMES placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORDuring the stimulation period the patient remained in a mini-squat position at thirty degrees and returned to zero degrees during the decay period. During the electrical stimulation off period, the patient spontaneously performed another mini-squat at 30 degrees without electrical stimulation. The patients in the CKC + NMES placebo group simulated the same work applied to the NMES group. Notably, this group was also connected to the electrodes, but the equipment was set at a stimulus intensity of zero. We used a 10-channel electrical stimulation device with a 2500-Hz carrier frequency. We used four channels in the synchronous mode, with surface electrodes that were simultaneously fixed at the motor points of the quadriceps and hamstrings.
Closed Kinetic Chain Group
OTHERDuring the stimulation period, i.e., the on time, the patient remained in a mini-squat position at thirty degrees and returned to zero degrees during the decay period. During the electrical stimulation off period, the patient spontaneously performed another mini-squat at 30 degrees without electrical stimulation. The patients in the CKC + NMES placebo group simulated the same work applied to the NMES group. Notably, this group was also connected to the electrodes, but the equipment was set at a stimulus intensity of zero.
Interventions
We used a electrical stimulation device with a 2500-Hz carrier frequency. We used four channels in the synchronous mode, with surface electrodes that were simultaneously fixed at the motor points of the quadriceps and hamstrings. Initially, a warm-up protocol that was five minutes long was used at a stimulation frequency of 40 Hz to activate the slow fibers. These fibers activated with a four-second-contraction time (on), a four-second-stimulus rise time, a four-second-stimulation decay time and a 12-second relaxation time (off). We then increased the frequency to 70 Hz to activate the fast fibers for an additional 10 minutes using the parameters described above, and finally, the frequency was increase to 150 Hz for 10 minutes to achieve maximal muscle potentiation.
During the stimulation period, i.e., the on time, the patient remained in a mini-squat position at thirty degrees and returned to zero degrees during the decay period. During the electrical stimulation off period, the patient spontaneously performed another mini-squat at 30 degrees without electrical stimulation. The patients in the CKC + NMES placebo group simulated the same work applied to the NMES group. Notably, this group was also connected to the electrodes, but the equipment was set at a stimulus intensity of zero.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with grade I or grade II knee OA (based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification;
- which was diagnosed by a medical traumatologist;
- radiographic changes that demonstrated a reduced joint space in at least one of the compartments of the knee;
- subchondral bone sclerosis;
- consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- patients who had grade III and grade IV knee OA (based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification);
- who were involved in another rehabilitation program outside the center;
- who presented with clinical symptoms that would prevent them from participating in the exercises;
- who had heart disease;
- cardiac pacemakers;
- periarticular metal implants;
- who experienced changes in sensitivity;
- who had a previous history of knee injury (meniscus, ligaments, sprains);
- who had uncontrolled diabetes;
- neurological disorders with cognitive impairments;
- rheumatic diseases;
- history of knee trauma in the last six months;
- prior knee surgery;
- three consecutive unexcused absences.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcelo Dohnert
Universidade Luterana do Brasil
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2011
First Posted
March 23, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 23, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-03