Exercise Training Program for Cerebellar Ataxia
2 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a person's ability to adapt (i.e. short term motor learning) predicts their ability to benefit from physical therapy exercises.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedApril 1, 2015
March 1, 2015
3 years
February 23, 2011
March 31, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in walking speed from baseline to mid-training and to post-training
Here, we ask whether a person's ability to adapt (i.e. short term motor learning) predicts their ability to benefit from physical therapy exercises. Our prediction is that those individuals with some preserved adaptive ability will be show the greatest improvement in walking speed.
Participants are assessed at baseline (week 1 and week 3), mid-training (week 6), and post-training (week 9 and week 13). There are a total of 13 weeks for this study with 5 visits during that time period
Study Arms (1)
Home exercise program
EXPERIMENTALBalance and walking exercise program
Interventions
The home exercise program uses standard physical therapy exercises that have never been rigorously tested for people with cerebellar ataxia. These include sitting balance exercises (e.g. sitting on a peanut-shaped exercise ball and moving arms or legs), standing balance exercises (e.g. weight shifting, moving arms and legs), and walking exercises (e.g. walking heel-to-toe). The exercises are in a progression, going from less to more challenging. Though the exercises are standard, they are the intervention that we are testing and we will consider them experimental.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cerebellar damage from stroke, tumor, or degeneration
- Able to stand and take steps with or without assistance
- Age 18-95
You may not qualify if:
- Extrapyramidal symptoms
- Peripheral vestibular loss (e.g. absence of VOR)
- Congestive heart failure
- Peripheral artery disease with claudication
- Pulmonary or Renal Failure
- Unstable angina
- Uncontrolled hypertension ( \> 190/100 mmHg)
- Dementia (Mini-Mental State exam \> 22)
- Severe aphasia
- Orthopedic or pain conditions
- Pregnancy
- Prisoner
- Evidence of chronic white matter disease on MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Motion Analysis Lab in the Kennedy Krieger Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amy J Bastian, PhD, PT
Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2011
First Posted
March 2, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 1, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03