Non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic Versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3
Monocentric, Randomized, Subject and Rater Blinded Clinical Investigation to Prove the Non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic Versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3 Containing Lidocaine - After Single Injection for Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF)
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will investigate the non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3 in the treatment of nasolabial folds
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedJune 20, 2011
June 1, 2011
3 months
February 25, 2011
June 17, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The proportion of subjects reporting an equal or better outcome for the side of face treated with Belotero® Basic compared to the side of face treated with Juvéderm® Ultra 3 at V4 on the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II
Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Overall intra-individual change at V2 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation
Week 0
Overall intra-individual change at V3 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation
2 Weeks
Overall intra-individual change at V4 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation
4 Weeks
Overall absolute score change at V2 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation assessed by photo rating of one independent rater
Week 0
Overall absolute score change at V3 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation assessed by photo rating of one independent rater
2 Weeks
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Hyaluronic Acid Filler - Medical Device
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The dosage is individualized depending on the depth of the NLF. The goal is to achieve optimal correction of both NLF with single implantations of Belotero® Basic and Juvéderm® Ultra 3 respectively. Each subject will be injected with Belotero® Basic and Lidocaine containing Juvéderm® Ultra 3 according to a split-face design. The allocation of fillers to the side of the face will be randomized. The randomization method is block-wise with a ratio 1:1 to the groups Belotero® Basic left and Juvéderm® Ultra 3 right, Belotero® Basic right and Juvéderm® Ultra 3 left.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject with bilateral, symmetrical NLF and wish for correction. Documented severity of NLF score 2 or 3 at screening on the Merz Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II
You may not qualify if:
- Any severe or uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g. cardiac, renal, pulmonary, hepatic, or gastrointestinal). Subject suffering from diabetes mellitus, autoimmune and rheumatic diseases, clinically relevant coagulation disorders, recurrent angina, or severe psychic, neurological or mental disease
- History of malignancy within the last 5 years before the study
- Infection, inflammations or active dermatological disease in the face
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Praxisklinik Kaiserplatz
Frankfurt am Main, 60311, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clemens Acker, Dr.
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2011
First Posted
February 28, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 20, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-06