NCT01305187

Brief Summary

This study will investigate the non-inferiority of Belotero® Basic versus Juvéderm® Ultra 3 in the treatment of nasolabial folds

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2011

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 25, 2011

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2011

Status Verified

June 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

February 25, 2011

Last Update Submit

June 17, 2011

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The proportion of subjects reporting an equal or better outcome for the side of face treated with Belotero® Basic compared to the side of face treated with Juvéderm® Ultra 3 at V4 on the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II

    Week 4

Secondary Outcomes (19)

  • Overall intra-individual change at V2 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation

    Week 0

  • Overall intra-individual change at V3 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation

    2 Weeks

  • Overall intra-individual change at V4 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation

    4 Weeks

  • Overall absolute score change at V2 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation assessed by photo rating of one independent rater

    Week 0

  • Overall absolute score change at V3 post implantation in the validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II compared to V2 pre implantation assessed by photo rating of one independent rater

    2 Weeks

  • +14 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Hyaluronic Acid Filler - Medical Device

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Hyaluronic Acid Filler

Interventions

The dosage is individualized depending on the depth of the NLF. The goal is to achieve optimal correction of both NLF with single implantations of Belotero® Basic and Juvéderm® Ultra 3 respectively. Each subject will be injected with Belotero® Basic and Lidocaine containing Juvéderm® Ultra 3 according to a split-face design. The allocation of fillers to the side of the face will be randomized. The randomization method is block-wise with a ratio 1:1 to the groups Belotero® Basic left and Juvéderm® Ultra 3 right, Belotero® Basic right and Juvéderm® Ultra 3 left.

Hyaluronic Acid Filler - Medical Device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject with bilateral, symmetrical NLF and wish for correction. Documented severity of NLF score 2 or 3 at screening on the Merz Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale II

You may not qualify if:

  • Any severe or uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g. cardiac, renal, pulmonary, hepatic, or gastrointestinal). Subject suffering from diabetes mellitus, autoimmune and rheumatic diseases, clinically relevant coagulation disorders, recurrent angina, or severe psychic, neurological or mental disease
  • History of malignancy within the last 5 years before the study
  • Infection, inflammations or active dermatological disease in the face

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Praxisklinik Kaiserplatz

Frankfurt am Main, 60311, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Skin Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Clemens Acker, Dr.

    Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2011

First Posted

February 28, 2011

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2011

Study Completion

May 1, 2011

Last Updated

June 20, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-06

Locations