Study Stopped
Insufficient Enrollment
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of pH on Pain Upon Local Anesthetic Administration.
A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of pH on Pain Upon Local Anesthetic Administration.
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
When one receives a local anesthetic, such as novocaine for a dental procedure, there is a burning painful sensation experienced upon injection of the local anesthetic. We are trying to understand the role of pH (how acidic a solution is) in the production of pain during local anesthetic administration. We hypothesize that less acidic solutions produce less burning. We also want to determine whether or not the pH of the solution affects the rate of onset of the local anesthesia. We will recruit subjects from patients who have a clinical indication for lumbar medial branch (LMB) nerve blocks, procedures frequently performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Pain Medicine. For each patient, three nerve blocks are administered at adjacent spinal levels, typically using either lidocaine or bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine as the local anesthetic. We will add a saline control as part of the research procedure and then provide lidocaine at the control location before continuing with the nerve blocks. This clinical procedure offers an ideal opportunity to compare the effects of the three solutions. There will be almost no deviation from the standard clinical procedure. After the injection of each solution, the pain score on administration of the medication will be recorded immediately. We will also provide a continuous stimulation (pin taps) after the local anesthetic injection and record when the patient experiences hypoesthesia (reduced sensation) and anesthesia (absent sensation). Finally, we will record the pain score upon reinsertion of a needle to mark the precise location (part of the clinical procedure) one minute after the local anesthetic injection. All data will be collected during the a single clinical visit. The study will conclude when 60 subjects have successfully been tested. Data will be reviewed annually.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 11, 2017
CompletedApril 11, 2017
February 1, 2017
3.8 years
February 18, 2011
January 11, 2017
February 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rank-transformed Pain Score
Pain score upon injection of local anesthetic: the pain score is a validated 11-point numeric rating scale in which patients rate pain between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable).
immediate, upon injection of each solution
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Hypoesthesia
0-180 seconds after each injection.
Rank-transformed Time (Seconds) Until Anesthesia
0-180 seconds after each injection
Rank-transformed Pain Score Upon Needle Stick.
1 minute after each injection
Study Arms (3)
normal saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORlidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORalkalinized lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
1 ml subcutaneous injection of 0.9% lidocaine and 0.84% sodium bicarbonate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients at MGH Center for Pain Medicine who have clinical indication for undergoing diagnostic medial branch block of nerves to facet joints.
You may not qualify if:
- contraindication to the clinical procedure
- do not speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Brian Wainger
- Organization
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian J Wainger, MD, PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Instructor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2011
First Posted
February 25, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 11, 2017
Results First Posted
April 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02