Tidal Irrigation Versus Intra-articular Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
150
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Previous studies have indicated that patient expectations, beliefs and preferences may have an impact on treatment outcomes. The KIVIS study was primarily designed to compare two effective treatments for knee osteoarthritis (tidal irrigation (medical washout of the knee) or intra-articular corticosteroid injection). At study entry any preference expressed by the patient for each of the treatment interventions was recorded. This study assessed the effects of two treatments given at a single time-point and hence the effects of patient preference could be assessed independently of any compliance issues.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Nov 2000
Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2000
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2011
CompletedApril 24, 2017
April 1, 2017
2.7 years
January 27, 2011
April 21, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
WOMAC pain (WP)score
Weeks 0
Visual Analogue Scale
Weeks 0
WOMAC pain (WP)score
Weeks 2
WOMAC pain (WP)score
Weeks 4
WOMAC pain (WP)score
Weeks 12
WOMAC pain (WP)score
Weeks 26
Visual Analogue Scale
Weeks 2
Visual Analogue Scale
Weeks 4
Visual Analogue Scale
Weeks 12
Visual Analogue Scale
Weeks 26
Secondary Outcomes (6)
WOMAC physical function score (WF)
Weeks 0,2,4,12,26
Overall assessment of the impact of the procedure by the patient (five point scale) (PA)
Weeks 0,2,4,12,26
Overall assessment of the impact of the procedure by the blinded clinician (five point scale)(CA)
Weeks 0,2,4,12,26
Time to walk fifty metre
Weeks 0,2,4,12,26
Analgesic intake
Weeks 0,2,4,12,26
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TI of the knee
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntra-articular CSI
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
After full aseptic preparation, 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 2 ml 1% lignocaine were injected into the joint cavity using the medial patello-femoral approach via a 21-gauge needle.
This was done as a day case procedure under local anaesthetic. The medial patello-femoral approach was used. After full aseptic preparation, the skin and soft tissues were infiltrated with 5e10 ml of 1% lignocaine. The joint was then instilled with a further 10 ml of 1% lignocaine. After an initial puncture using a scalpel, a 3.2 mm diameter wrist arthroscope was advanced into the joint cavity. Up to 1 l of 0.9% normal saline was then irrigated through the joint: saline was run into the joint until fully distended and then allowed to flow out of the joint in a cyclical method until the aspirated fluid runs clear for at least three successive cycles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of knee OA
- Knee pain for most days of the prior month
- Radiographic evidence consistent with knee OA
- Aged between 40 and 90 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Symptomatic hip OA
- Co-existent inflammatory or crystal arthritis
- Prior knee surgery
- Injury to the knee in the preceding 6 months
- Any intra-articular injection in the preceding 3 months
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nigel K Arden
MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2011
First Posted
February 25, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2000
Primary Completion
July 1, 2003
Study Completion
December 1, 2004
Last Updated
April 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04