NCT01302483

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of Kovacaine Mist (3% tetracaine HCl with 0.05% oxymetazoline HCl) for anesthesia of the maxillary teeth for dental procedures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2009

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2011

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 24, 2011

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 17, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

June 17, 2015

Status Verified

June 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

February 18, 2011

Results QC Date

March 2, 2011

Last Update Submit

June 16, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pulpal Anesthesia

    Number of participants who did not need rescue anesthesia to complete the study dental procedure, i.e. Kovacaine provided enough pulpal anesthesia to complete a dental procedure.

    Continuous throughout dental treatment period (up to 60 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Soft Tissue Anesthesia Duration

    Baseline, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80, 100, 120 minutes

  • Maximum Change in Pulse From Baseline

    Baseline, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120 minutes

  • Maximum Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline

    Baseline, 15, 20, 30, 40 50, 60, 120 minutes

  • Maximum Change in Pulse Oximetry From Baseline

    Baseline, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Kovacaine Nasal Spray

EXPERIMENTAL

3% tetracaine HCL with 0.05% oxymetazoline HCL - Delivered via 3 sprays (100 uL) in each nostril

Drug: 3% tetracaine HCL with 0.05% oxymetazoline HCL

Lidocaine Injection

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

.5 to 1 catridge of 2% lidocaine HCL with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Drug: Lidocaine Injection

Interventions

1 sham injection along with 3 sprays of Kovacaine Nasal Spray in each nostril; a 4-minute interval between every set of sprays. The total dose of 3% tetracaine HCL with 0.05% oxymetazoline HCL was 18 mg/0.3 mg.

Kovacaine Nasal Spray

Each subject received both an injection along with 3 sprays of isotonic saline sham in each nostril; a 4-minute interval between every set of sprays.

Lidocaine Injection

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female between 18 and 65 years of age
  • Sufficiently healthy as determined by the investigator to receive the test and control medications and undergo the scheduled dental procedure
  • Required an operative restorative procedure on a single maxillary tooth, other than a maxillary second or third molar, with treatment time not expected to exceed 60 minutes
  • Could breathe through both nostrils
  • Had normal lip, nose, eyelid, and cheek sensations
  • Could understand and sign the informed consent document
  • Could communicate with the investigator
  • Could understand and comply with the requirements of the protocol

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinically relevant history or presence of respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, hematological, lymphatic, cardiovascular, psychiatric, musculoskeletal, neurologic, genitourinary, infective, inflammatory, immunological, dermatological, or connective tissue disease or disorder or a clinically relevant history or presence of angle-closure glaucoma
  • Clinically relevant sinus/nasal surgical history
  • Baseline Visual Analog Scale value of \> 36 (or greater than weak) at the treatment site
  • Had not had dental work requiring a local anesthetic within the last 24 hours or had taken pain medications within the last 48 hours
  • Required prophylactic antibiotics for subacute bacterial endocarditis (infectious endocarditis)
  • Allergic to or intolerant of tetracaine, benzocaine, other ester local anesthetics, or p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), as found in PABA-containing sunscreens
  • Allergic to or intolerant of oxymetazoline, epinephrine, or preservatives in their solutions
  • Had a current condition, such as nasal congestion or sinus infection, that may have influenced responses to study medications
  • History of alcoholism and/or drug abuse
  • Had taken a monamine oxidase inhibitor within the past 3 weeks
  • Were nursing, pregnant, suspected of being pregnant, or trying to become pregnant (females were required to take a urine pregnancy test to rule out pregnancy)
  • Had used any investigational drug and/or participated in any clinical trial within 30 days of baseline

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ciancio SG, Hutcheson MC, Ayoub F, Pantera EA Jr, Pantera CT, Garlapo DA, Sobieraj BD, Almubarak SA. Safety and efficacy of a novel nasal spray for maxillary dental anesthesia. J Dent Res. 2013 Jul;92(7 Suppl):43S-8S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513484334. Epub 2013 May 20.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

TetracaineOxymetazolineLidocaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

para-AminobenzoatesAminobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesAniline CompoundsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

The VAS was misadministered such that even subjects with enough pain to require rescue reported essentially no pain on the global VAS. As this would exaggerate the efficacy of the study drug, these measures were not used to calculate its efficacy.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Sebastian Ciancio
Organization
Department of Periodontics & Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Buffalo, SUNY

Study Officials

  • Sebastian G Ciancio, DDS

    Department of Periodontics & Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, SUNY

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2011

First Posted

February 24, 2011

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion

January 1, 2009

Study Completion

January 1, 2009

Last Updated

June 17, 2015

Results First Posted

June 17, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-06

Locations