Anesthetic Efficacy of Liposomal Prilocaine in Maxillary Infiltration Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics New Formulations: From Development to Clinical Tests
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This blinded randomized, crossover, three period study aim to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of liposome-encapsulated 3% prilocaine compared to 3% plain prilocaine and 3% prilocaine with 0,03IU/mL felypressin, after 1.8mL infiltration in the buccal sulcus of the maxillary right canine, in 32 volunteers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Jul 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2010
CompletedFebruary 23, 2010
June 1, 2008
1.1 years
February 19, 2010
February 22, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anesthesia success, onset and duration of pulpal and gingival anesthesia.
10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Injection pain - Visual Analogue Scale
1 minute after the injections
Study Arms (3)
liposome-encapsulated 3% prilocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3% plain prilocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3% prilocaine with 0,03IU/mL felypressin
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
1.8mL infiltration of liposome-encapsulated 3% prilocaine, 3% plain prilocaine or 3% prilocaine with 0,03IU/mL felypressin in the buccal sulcus of the maxillary right canine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- good health
- no history of allergy to the components of the local anesthetic formulations tested
- maxillary canine, lateral incisor, and first premolar responsible to electric stimulation
You may not qualify if:
- intake of any medication that would alter pain perception
- history of trauma or sensitivity, caries, restorations, periodontal disease and endodontic treatment in the maxillary canine, lateral incisor, and first premolar
- systemic disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Piracicaba Dental School
Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13414903, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eneida de Paula, PhD
University of Campinas, Brazil
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2010
First Posted
February 23, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 23, 2010
Record last verified: 2008-06