Sertraline Pediatric Registry for the Evaluation of Safety (SPRITES)
SPRITES
SPRITES: SERTRALINE PEDIATRIC REGISTRY FOR THE EVALUATION OF SAFETY A NON-INTERVENTIONAL, LONGITUDINAL, COHORT STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM SERTRALINE TREATMENT IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
2 other identifiers
observational
941
1 country
44
Brief Summary
To evaluate the long-term impact of treatment with sertraline on aspects of cognitive, emotional and physical development and pubertal maturation in pediatric subjects ages 6 to 16 years (inclusive) with a diagnosis of anxiety disorder, depressive disorder or obsessive compulsive disorder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for all trials
44 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 4, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 9, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 8, 2021
CompletedOctober 14, 2021
October 1, 2021
8.4 years
February 1, 2011
September 9, 2021
October 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (58)
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Trails B at Month 3
Trail B test is a set of shifting task, in which participants were asked to drawn a line from number 1 to letter A, then to number 2, then to letter B, then to number 3, then to letter C then so forth until they connected the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting pen or pencil from the paper. Participant was timed (maximum time limit was 300 seconds or 5 minutes) to connect the "trail." If the participant made an error, and it was pointed out immediately, the participant was allowed to correct it. Errors affected the participant's score only in that the correction of errors was included in the completion time for the task. A higher number of errors was indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Raw results were the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. Raw results based on age norms were transformed to Z-scores. Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation.
Baseline, Month 3
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Trails B at Month 6
Trail B test is a set of shifting task, in which participants were asked to drawn a line from number 1 to letter A, then to number 2, then to letter B, then to number 3, then to letter C then so forth until they connected the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting pen or pencil from the paper. Participant was timed (maximum time limit was 300 seconds or 5 minutes) to connect the "trail." If the participant made an error, and it was pointed out immediately, the participant was allowed to correct it. Errors affected the participant's score only in that the correction of errors was included in the completion time for the task. A higher number of errors was indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Raw results were the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. Raw results based on age norms were transformed to Z-scores. Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation.
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Trails B at Month 12
Trail B test is a set of shifting task, in which participants were asked to drawn a line from number 1 to letter A, then to number 2, then to letter B, then to number 3, then to letter C then so forth until they connected the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting pen or pencil from the paper. Participant was timed (maximum time limit was 300 seconds or 5 minutes) to connect the "trail." If the participant made an error, and it was pointed out immediately, the participant was allowed to correct it. Errors affected the participant's score only in that the correction of errors was included in the completion time for the task. A higher number of errors was indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Raw results were the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. Raw results based on age norms were transformed to Z-scores. Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Trails B at Month 18
Trail B test is a set of shifting task, in which participants were asked to drawn a line from number 1 to letter A, then to number 2, then to letter B, then to number 3, then to letter C then so forth until they connected the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting pen or pencil from the paper. Participant was timed (maximum time limit was 300 seconds or 5 minutes) to connect the "trail." If the participant made an error, and it was pointed out immediately, the participant was allowed to correct it. Errors affected the participant's score only in that the correction of errors was included in the completion time for the task. A higher number of errors was indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Raw results were the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. Raw results based on age norms were transformed to Z-scores. Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation.
Baseline, Month 18
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Trails B at Month 24
Trail B test is a set of shifting task, in which participants were asked to drawn a line from number 1 to letter A, then to number 2, then to letter B, then to number 3, then to letter C then so forth until they connected the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting pen or pencil from the paper. Participant was timed (maximum time limit was 300 seconds or 5 minutes) to connect the "trail." If the participant made an error, and it was pointed out immediately, the participant was allowed to correct it. Errors affected the participant's score only in that the correction of errors was included in the completion time for the task. A higher number of errors was indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Raw results were the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. Raw results based on age norms were transformed to Z-scores. Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation.
Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Trails B at Month 30
Trail B test is a set of shifting task, in which participants were asked to drawn a line from number 1 to letter A, then to number 2, then to letter B, then to number 3, then to letter C then so forth until they connected the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting pen or pencil from the paper. Participant was timed (maximum time limit was 300 seconds or 5 minutes) to connect the "trail." If the participant made an error, and it was pointed out immediately, the participant was allowed to correct it. Errors affected the participant's score only in that the correction of errors was included in the completion time for the task. A higher number of errors was indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Raw results were the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. Raw results based on age norms were transformed to Z-scores. Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation.
Baseline, Month 30
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Trails B at Month 36
Trail B test is a set of shifting task, in which participants were asked to drawn a line from number 1 to letter A, then to number 2, then to letter B, then to number 3, then to letter C then so forth until they connected the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting pen or pencil from the paper. Participant was timed (maximum time limit was 300 seconds or 5 minutes) to connect the "trail." If the participant made an error, and it was pointed out immediately, the participant was allowed to correct it. Errors affected the participant's score only in that the correction of errors was included in the completion time for the task. A higher number of errors was indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Raw results were the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. Raw results based on age norms were transformed to Z-scores. Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation.
Baseline, Month 36
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Metacognition Index From Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at Month 3
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 3
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Metacognition Index From Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at Month 6
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Metacognition Index From Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at Month 12
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Metacognition Index From Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at Month 18
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 18
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Metacognition Index From Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at Month 24
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Metacognition Index From Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at Month 30
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 30
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Using Metacognition Index From Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at Month 36
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 36
Change From Baseline in Behavioral/Emotional Regulation Using the Behavior Regulation Index From BRIEF at Month 3
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 3
Change From Baseline in Behavioral/Emotional Regulation Using the Behavior Regulation Index From BRIEF at Month 6
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Behavioral/Emotional Regulation Using the Behavior Regulation Index From BRIEF at Month 12
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in Behavioral/Emotional Regulation Using the Behavior Regulation Index From BRIEF at Month 18
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 18
Change From Baseline in Behavioral/Emotional Regulation Using the Behavior Regulation Index From BRIEF at Month 24
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Behavioral/Emotional Regulation Using the Behavior Regulation Index From BRIEF at Month 30
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 30
Change From Baseline in Behavioral/Emotional Regulation Using the Behavior Regulation Index From BRIEF at Month 36
BRIEF has 86-items to measure the neurocognitive performance for 8 subscales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, initiate, working memory, plan-organize, organization of materials and monitor. These are subsumed in 2 broad factors: a behavior regulation index consisted inhibit, shift, and emotional control subscales, a metacognition index consisted working memory, initiate, plan/organize, organization of materials, and task-monitor scale. Each item had a 3-point scale (1= never, 2= sometimes, 3= often). Z-score was based on mean raw score for T-score= 50 and SD = +/- 10. (actual value raw score at T=50)/SD (mean SD where T=40,60), based on age and gender norms from BRIEF professional manual. T-score provided information of individual's scores relative to scores of respondents in the standardization sample. Lower Z- scores indicated better functioning.
Baseline, Month 36
Change From Baseline in Height at Month 3
Height was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw height measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on centers for disease control (CDC) norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 3
Change From Baseline in Height at Month 6
Height was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw height measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Height at Month 12
Height was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw height measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in Height at Month 18
Height was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw height measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 18
Change From Baseline in Height at Month 24
Height was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw height measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Height at Month 30
Height was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw height measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 30
Change From Baseline in Height at Month 36
Height was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw height measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 36
Change From Baseline in Weight at Month 3
Weight was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw weight measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 3
Change From Baseline in Weight at Month 6
Weight was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw weight measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Weight at Month 12
Weight was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw weight measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in Weight at Month 18
Weight was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw weight measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 18
Change From Baseline in Weight at Month 24
Weight was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw weight measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Weight at Month 30
Weight was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw weight measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 30
Change From Baseline in Weight at Month 36
Weight was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw weight measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score= actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 36
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 3
BMI is participant's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw BMI measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 3
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 6
BMI is participant's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw BMI measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 12
BMI is participant's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw BMI measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 18
BMI is participant's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw BMI measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 18
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 24
BMI is participant's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw BMI measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 30
BMI is participant's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw BMI measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 30
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 36
BMI is participant's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was measured and referenced to norms according to standardized procedures from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Raw BMI measurements were norm-adjusted transformed to Z-score using formula: Z-score = actual value minus normative value divided by standard deviation based on CDC norms for age and gender.
Baseline, Month 36
Primary: Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Baseline: All Males
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for males in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed. Participants were evaluated for genital development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Baseline (prior to or within 45 Days of initiating treatment, if exposed) and after parental/guardian provided permission and assent
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 3: All Males
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for males in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed. Participants were evaluated for genital development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 3
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 6: All Males
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for males in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed. Participants were evaluated for genital development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 6
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 12: All Males
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for males in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed. Participants were evaluated for genital development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 12
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 18: All Males
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for males in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed. Participants were evaluated for genital development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 18
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 24: All Males
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for males in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed. Participants were evaluated for genital development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 24
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 30: All Males
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for males in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed. Participants were evaluated for genital development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 30
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 36: All Males
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for males in pubertal development (pubic hair, penis and testes) were assessed. Participants were evaluated for genital development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 36
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Baseline: All Females
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for females in pubertal development were assessed. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Baseline (prior to or within 45 Days of initiating treatment, if exposed) and after parental/guardian provided permission and assent
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 3: All Females
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for females in pubertal development were assessed. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 3
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 6: All Females
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for females in pubertal development were assessed. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 6
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 12: All Females
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for females in pubertal development were assessed. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 12
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 18: All Females
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for females in pubertal development were assessed. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 18
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 24: All Females
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for females in pubertal development were assessed. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 24
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 30: All Females
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for females in pubertal development were assessed. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 30
Number of Participants With Tanner Staging Evaluation at Month 36: All Females
Tanner stage defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. The physical changes for females in pubertal development were assessed. Participants were evaluated for pubic hair distribution, breast development, with values ranging from stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics).
Month 36
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants in Each Category of Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Number of Participants in Each Category of Clinical Global Impression-Tolerability (CGI-T) Scale at Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Number of Participants Who Were Responders According to Clinical Global Impression-Effectiveness (CGI-E) Scale at Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Number of Participants in Each Category of Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale at Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Change From Baseline in Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) at Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sertraline-treated
enrolled subjects beginning treatment for one of the study qualifying disorders with sertraline
psychotherapy only
enrolled subjects beginning treatment for one of the study qualifying disorders with psychotherapy
Interventions
Non interventional study - drug, dose, duration etc as per USPI and clinician discretion
Eligibility Criteria
The accessible population is children meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria from US centers in various clinical settings, including the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Trials Network (CAPTN). From these, the study-eligible population (all children age 6 to 16 (inclusive) with an anxiety, depressive, or obsessive-compulsive disorder, who are exposed to sertraline under real-world conditions) will comprise an inception cohort of enrolled subjects beginning treatment for one of the study-qualifying disorders with sertraline or psychotherapy.
You may qualify if:
- Children age 6 to 16 (inclusive) with anxiety, depression, or obsessive-compulsive disorder, receiving treatment in outpatient setting, and who are prescribed a new prescription for sertraline to treat one of the above study-qualifying disorders or beginning psychotherapy for same.
You may not qualify if:
- Psychotic at study entry
- Diagnosis of bipolar disorder
- Diagnosis of schizoaffective or schizophrenia
- Anorexia
- Bulimia or eating disorder not otherwise specified (NOS)
- Autism
- Pervasive developmental disorder
- High risk of suicide within 2 weeks of initiating study treatment
- Significant mental retardation
- Taking an antidepressant medication other than sertraline, first or second generation antipsychotic, lithium, psychostimulant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (44)
Harmonex Neuroscience Research
Dothan, Alabama, 36303, United States
Sun Valley Research Center
Imperial, California, 92251, United States
UCLA Semel institute
Los Angeles, California, 90024, United States
Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Comprehensive Psychiatric Care
Norwich, Connecticut, 06360, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Nemours Children's Clinic, Dept. of Psychology and Psychiatry
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
Medical Research Group of Central Florida
Orange City, Florida, 32763, United States
Harmonex Neuroscience of Pensacola
Pensacola, Florida, 32502, United States
University of South Florida - Rothman Center
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701, United States
Georgia Regents University Augusta
Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States
Institute for Behavioral Medicine, LLC
Smyrna, Georgia, 30080, United States
Family Behavioral Health
Plainfield, Illinois, 60585, United States
University of Kansas School of Medicine/Dept. of Psychiatry
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160-7341, United States
Family Service and Guidance Center
Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States
Kennedy Krieger Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Neuroscientific Insights
Rockville, Maryland, 20852, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Debora A. LaMonica, MD
South Yarmouth, Massachusetts, 02664, United States
Baystate Medical Center, Child Behavioral Health Research
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Comprehensive Psychiatric Associates
Gladstone, Missouri, 64118, United States
Saint John's Clinic
Springfield, Missouri, 65804, United States
Jersey Shore University Medical Center/Meridian Health
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753, United States
Children's Specialized Hospital
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755, United States
Finger Lakes Clinical Research
Rochester, New York, 14618, United States
3-C Family Services, P.A.
Cary, North Carolina, 27513, United States
Duke University Medical Center, Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Scott George Crowder, M.D.
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
Family Center by the Falls
Chagrin Falls, Ohio, 44023, United States
University Of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Cincinnati Childrens Hospital and Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220, United States
Case Western Reserve University, Department of Psychiatry Child/Adolescent
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Cutting Edge Research Group
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73116, United States
Child Guidance Resource Center
Havertown, Pennsylvania, 19083, United States
Tullahoma Pediatrics PLLC
Tullahoma, Tennessee, 37388, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
Bay Pointe Behavioral Health Service, Inc.
Friendswood, Texas, 77546, United States
Midtown Psychiatry and TMS Center
Houston, Texas, 77007, United States
Peter Ly MD
Houston, Texas, 77058, United States
Focus and Balance, LLC
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Clinical Research Partners, LLC
Petersburg, Virginia, 23805, United States
McLean Hospital - Harvard Medical School
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53227, United States
Related Publications (2)
Kolitsopoulos F, Ramaker S, Compton SN, Broderick S, Orazem J, Bao W, Lokhnygina Y, Marschall K, Chappell P. Effects of Long-Term Sertraline Use on Pediatric Growth and Development: The Sertraline Pediatric Registry for The Evaluation of Safety (SPRITES). J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2023 Feb;33(1):2-13. doi: 10.1089/cap.2022.0048.
PMID: 36799958DERIVEDKolitsopoulos F, Ramaker S, Compton S, Broderick S, Orazem J, Bao W, Lokhnygina Y, Chappell P. Sertraline Pediatric Registry for the Evaluation of Safety: Design and Clinical Characteristics of Pediatric Patients Prescribed Sertraline. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021 Aug;31(6):411-420. doi: 10.1089/cap.2020.0170. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
PMID: 34287023DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2011
First Posted
February 23, 2011
Study Start
April 4, 2012
Primary Completion
September 9, 2020
Study Completion
September 9, 2020
Last Updated
October 14, 2021
Results First Posted
October 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.