Study Stopped
Slow recruitment
Early Cardiac Toxicity of Adjuvant CT in Elderly BC.
Early Detection of Chemotherapy Induced Cardiac Damage in Elderly Patients With Early Breast Cancer: a Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing (Neo) Adjuvant Epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) Versus Docetaxel (Taxotere)-Cyclophosphamide (TC.)
2 other identifiers
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to evaluate the difference in cardiac strain rate evolution in elderly early BC patients treated with (neo) adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy compared with a non-anthracycline regimen (Taxotere-cyclophosphamide) CT. This study also will compare the serum biomarkers profile during and after the (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, assess whether MRI allows detecting earlier than standard echocardiography the signs of cardiotoxicity, during and after adjuvant (neo) CT, assess whether brain PET-CT allows detecting regional functional impairment in patients receiving CT, evaluate cognitive function before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate psychological state and burden of primary caregivers before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate primary caregivers abilities to detect patients' distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate the short and long-term toxicity profile of the regimens, estimate the 10-year risk of relapse and/or death using the Adjuvant!Online tool, and estimate the Framingham risk score for Hard Coronary Heart Disease (10-year risk).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 breast-cancer
Started Mar 2011
Typical duration for phase_2 breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 30, 2013
February 1, 2011
2 years
February 18, 2011
August 29, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The difference between cardiac strain rates measured at baseline and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy.
The primary null hypothesis is that the means are equal versus the alternative hypothesis that the means are different. We plan to perform the comparison using a two-sided Student's t-test with α=5%. The power of the study to detect the difference described below has been set at 90%. One hundred twenty patients candidate to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT for early BC will be randomized 1:1 to receive either epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) or docetaxel (Taxotere) -cyclophosphamide (TC) for 4 cycles.
Before chemotherapy, after chemotherapy, at 6 months, one , two and 3 years from randomization.
Study Arms (2)
Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles
docetaxel/cyclophosphamide
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (Taxotere) (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Interventions
* Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. * Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jules Bordet Institutelead
- Sanoficollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, 1000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lissandra Dal Lago, MD
Jules Bordet Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Evandro De Azambuja, MD
Jules Bordet Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2011
First Posted
February 23, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2011-02