NCT01301040

Brief Summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the difference in cardiac strain rate evolution in elderly early BC patients treated with (neo) adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy compared with a non-anthracycline regimen (Taxotere-cyclophosphamide) CT. This study also will compare the serum biomarkers profile during and after the (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, assess whether MRI allows detecting earlier than standard echocardiography the signs of cardiotoxicity, during and after adjuvant (neo) CT, assess whether brain PET-CT allows detecting regional functional impairment in patients receiving CT, evaluate cognitive function before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate psychological state and burden of primary caregivers before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate primary caregivers abilities to detect patients' distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate the short and long-term toxicity profile of the regimens, estimate the 10-year risk of relapse and/or death using the Adjuvant!Online tool, and estimate the Framingham risk score for Hard Coronary Heart Disease (10-year risk).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2 breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2011

Typical duration for phase_2 breast-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2011

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2011

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2013

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

August 30, 2013

Status Verified

February 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

February 18, 2011

Last Update Submit

August 29, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

breast cancer, elderly, early cardiac toxicity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The difference between cardiac strain rates measured at baseline and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy.

    The primary null hypothesis is that the means are equal versus the alternative hypothesis that the means are different. We plan to perform the comparison using a two-sided Student's t-test with α=5%. The power of the study to detect the difference described below has been set at 90%. One hundred twenty patients candidate to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT for early BC will be randomized 1:1 to receive either epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) or docetaxel (Taxotere) -cyclophosphamide (TC) for 4 cycles.

    Before chemotherapy, after chemotherapy, at 6 months, one , two and 3 years from randomization.

Study Arms (2)

Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles

Drug: epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel

docetaxel/cyclophosphamide

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (Taxotere) (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

Drug: epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel

Interventions

* Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. * Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

Also known as: Docetaxel: Taxotere, Cyclophosphamide: Endoxan, Epirubicin: Epirubicin Teva
Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamidedocetaxel/cyclophosphamide

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)
1. Patient selection criteria * Female aged equal or more than 65 years. * Histological diagnosis of early BC for which the treating physician considers (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy to be beneficial. Recommended situations are: * Triple negative BC if pT \> 1cm. * HER-2 positive BC if pT1 \> 1cm; and trastuzumab will be given after study chemotherapy. * "Luminal B" cancers defined as ER+, PgR + or neg, Ki-67 ≥ 14%, and pT1 \> 1cm. * "Luminal A" cancers (ER+, PgR+ and Ki-67 \< 14%) will be considered only if ≥ 4 nodes. * Poor response to a preoperative endocrine therapy. * WHO performance status equal or less than 1. * Baseline LVEF equal or more than 50% measured by echocardiography. * Adequate organ function including: * neutrophils more or equal to 1.5 x 109/L. * platelets more or equal to100 x 109/L. * bilirubin \< 1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for the institution. * transaminases: AST \< 2.5 x ULN , ALT \< 2.5 x ULN and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN for the institution. * Estimated creatinine clearance \> 30ml/min (using the Crockoft and Gault formula) (See Appendix E) . * No previous exposure to chemotherapy in this neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. * No serious cardiac illness or medical conditions as judged by the investigator including, but not confined to:Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias,Clinical and/or ECG evidence of myocardial infarction within the last 12 months,Coronary artery disease requiring medication,High-risk uncontrolled arrhythmias,Poorly controlled hypertension (e.g. systolic \>180 mm Hg or diastolic \>100 mm Hg). * Other concurrent serious diseases that may interfere with planned treatment including severe pulmonary conditions/illness. * No participation to other clinical trials involving therapeutic agents within the 6 weeks prior to the randomization. * No prior or concurrent diagnosis of cancer, except for adequately treated basocellular and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical uterine in situ tumor * Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial. * Signed written informed consent must be given according to ICH-GCP and national/local regulations, prior to any study specific screening procedures and randomization. 2. Caregiver selection criteria * to be identified by participating patients as their primary caregivers i.e the person who helps them the most to cope with cancer in their everyday life * to be at least eighteen years old * to be aware of the cancer diagnosis of the patients to be fit enough to complete the questionnaires * to be French speaking * to be free of any cognitive dysfunction. * to give their written informed consent as regards participation in the study.

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institut Jules Bordet

Brussels, 1000, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsCardiotoxicity

Interventions

EpirubicinCyclophosphamideDocetaxel

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsChemically-Induced DisordersRadiation InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DoxorubicinDaunorubicinAnthracyclinesNaphthacenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPolycyclic CompoundsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesPhosphoramide MustardsNitrogen Mustard CompoundsMustard CompoundsHydrocarbons, HalogenatedPhosphoramidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsTaxoidsCyclodecanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicDiterpenesTerpenes

Study Officials

  • Lissandra Dal Lago, MD

    Jules Bordet Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Evandro De Azambuja, MD

    Jules Bordet Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2011

First Posted

February 23, 2011

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion

March 1, 2013

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

August 30, 2013

Record last verified: 2011-02

Locations