NCT01300884

Brief Summary

Hypotheses: High definition manometry (HDM) is safe and feasible in humans; HDM accurately characterizes anorectal anatomy and function in healthy humans; HDM provides comparable information regarding the structure and function of the anorectal region, to that obtained from ano-rectal manometry and anal ultrasonography (AUS), in patients with fecal incontinence or constipation. Methods: 20 healthy volunteers, 20 patients with fecal incontinence, 20 patients with constipation will be recruited. Because anorectal disorders are more common in women, the investigators will recruit approximately 8 men and 12 women in each group. Each subject will undergo anorectal manometry, anal ultrasound and high definition manometry. Data Analysis: Spearman correlational analysis will be performed to compare the parameters listed above. Also, the diagnostic yield of anal ultrasonography vs HDM in identifying anatomic sphincter defects will be assessed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2008

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2008

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2011

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

July 23, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

January 19, 2011

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To assess the feasibility of HDM in three groups of human subjects; healthy humans, patients with fecal incontinence and patients with chronic constipation

    One visit

Study Arms (3)

healthy volunteers

patients with fecal incontinence

patients with constipation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

We will recruit 20 healthy volunteers, 20 patients with fecal incontinence, 20 patients with constipation. Because anorectal disorders are more common in women, we will recruit approximately 8 men and 12 women in each group. Because it is possible subjects may sign consent but not participate in the study, or drop out of the study before completion, we will recruit a total of 80 subjects.

You may qualify if:

  • For patients:
  • Either fecal incontinence (the occurrence of at least one episode of involuntary discharge of stool matter per week) or constipation (Rome III criteria) (16,17)
  • Adults between the ages of 18-80 yrs.
  • For healthy volunteers:
  • Adults between the ages of 18-80 yrs
  • No gastrointestinal symptoms

You may not qualify if:

  • Rectal prolapse or anal fissure on physical examination
  • Recent pelvic or recto-anal surgery (\< 6 months ago)
  • History of pelvic irradiation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ConstipationFecal Incontinence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsRectal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Satish SC Rao, MD, Phd

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2011

First Posted

February 23, 2011

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 23, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations