Belgian Pulmonary Function Study
BPFS
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pulmonary function tests including spirometry, lung volumes, measurements of resistance and diffusing capacity are essential in the diagnosis of several pulmonary diseases. These tests are an integral part of the diagnosis and treatment of lung diseases, but until now there is no clear evidence for the use of many of the pulmonary function tests because of a lack of adequate studies. The obscurity largely pertains to the conditions under which combinations of the various tests are indicated. Therefore the Belgian Thoracic Society, assembling all pulmonologists and the pneumology LOK/GLEM"s, will investigate this matter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedMarch 5, 2013
March 1, 2013
1 year
February 16, 2011
March 4, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pulmonary function tests (spirometry, volumes, resistance and diffusing capacity in that order) on the preferential diagnosis.
To determine the effect of stepwise addition of various pulmonary function tests (spirometry, volumes, resistance and diffusing capacity in that order) on the preferential diagnosis and its reflection of the gold standard (final diagnosis), a statistical score will be calculated based on 1/n differential diagnoses after every pulmonary function test. The score will contain corrections for a high number of differential diagnoses and a wrong preferential diagnosis and compared with Linear mixed model after logistic transformation.
end of study
Secondary Outcomes (4)
% correct preferential diagnoses
end of study
N differential diagnoses in the subgroup with correct preferential diagnosis
end of study
subgroup analyses
end of study
Sensitivity analysis
end of study
Study Arms (1)
Caucasian outpatients with respiratory symptoms
all consecutive new Caucasian outpatients with respiratory symptoms like dyspnoea, cough, sputum but without diagnosis who are being examined for the first time.
Eligibility Criteria
Caucasian outpatients with respiratory symptoms but without diagnosis
You may qualify if:
- Males and females
- Age between 18 and 75 years old
- New outpatients with respiratory symptoms as dyspnoea, cough, sputum, but without firm diagnosis
- Results of the tests are available and acceptable
- Standardized list of complaints
- Capability of patient for doing pulmonary function tests
- Seen by a Pneumologist
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with diagnosed respiratory disease
- Younger than 18 and older than 75 years old
- Recent heart attack
- Pneumothorax
- hemoptoic
- Suspicion of Tuberculosis
- Not capable to do pulmonary function tests
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Marc Decramerlead
- Belgian Pulmonary Societycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Decramer M, Janssens W, Derom E, Joos G, Ninane V, Deman R, Van Renterghem D, Liistro G, Bogaerts K; Belgian Pulmonary Function Study Investigators. Contribution of four common pulmonary function tests to diagnosis of patients with respiratory symptoms: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Nov;1(9):705-13. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70184-X. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
PMID: 24429274DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc MD Decramer, PhD
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2011
First Posted
February 17, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 5, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03