GOLD Stage I Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
GOLD
GOLD Stage I COPD: Is it Really a Disease ? Exercise Tolerance, Muscle Function and Response to Bronchodilation in GOLD Stage I COPD Patients
1 other identifier
observational
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recently integrated in clinical practice, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification states that a mild (stage I) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is present, in a smoker, when the postbronchodilator forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio is \< 0.7. A major change that was introduced by the GOLD classification system was that COPD could be diagnosed despite an FEV1 that is within normal predicted values (above 80% predicted). Because it suggests diagnosing and detecting COPD earlier than done until very recently in medical practice, the GOLD standards bring in a new reality to clinicians. In fact, this novel COPD classification comes with new research challenges because the functional impacts and systemic consequences related to COPD are mostly documented in patients with moderate to severe stages with little information specifically in GOLD stage I COPD. This information is important if the investigators are to convince physicians that GOLD stage I COPD needs to be diagnosed and eventually treated. The investigators aimed to characterize GOLD stage I COPD patients according to activity-related dyspnea. More specifically, our objectives were to compare: i) baseline pulmonary function ii) exercise capacity iii) quadriceps muscle function iv) levels of physical activity in daily life between symptomatic (Sx) GOLD stage I COPD patients, asymptomatic (ASx) GOLD stage I COPD patients and healthy control subjects (CTRL). The investigators reasoned that exercise tolerance and physical activity levels would be decreased in Sx GOLD stage I COPD patients as it would be similar between ASx GOLD stage I COPD patients and CTRL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2011
CompletedMay 26, 2011
May 1, 2011
May 12, 2011
May 24, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximal oxygen consumption
Exercise capacity was directly assessed following an incremental progressive shuttle test. The exercise capacity was defined as the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 peak, ml/kg/min) by direct measurements of gas exchanges.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Quadriceps muscle force
Baseline
Levels of physical activity in daily life
Baseline
Oxydative stress
Baseline
Pulmonary function
At baseline and before and 60-min after the nebulization of either placebo or bronchodilator
Time to exhaustion during a constant intensity exercise test
Before and 90-min after bronchodilation or placebo
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Healthy control subjects
Subjects with a significant smoking history (more than 10 pack-years) and a normal lung function.
Asymptomatic GOLD stage I COPD patients
GOLD stage I COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second \[FEV1\] \> 80% predicted and FEV1/ forced vital capacity \[FVC\] \< 0.7 and a smoking history \> 10 pack-years) were recruited. A Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score ≥ 2 was used to define the presence of symptoms (dyspnea). Concretely, this group did not present any respiratory symptoms, with a MRC dyspnea score of 1/5.
Symptomatic GOLD stage I COPD patients
GOLD stage I COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second \[FEV1\] \> 80% predicted and FEV1/ forced vital capacity \[FVC\] \< 0.7 and a smoking history \> 10 pack-years) were recruited. A Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score ≥ 2 was used to define the presence of symptoms (dyspnea) in this group.
Interventions
The COPD patients were randomly assigned a combination of ipratropium/salbutamol or a placebo in a double-blind crossover design. The bronchodilation produced by the medication was given in order to evaluate if bronchodilation was effective in increasing exercise tolerance during an endurance shuttle walking test in patients with GOLD stage I COPD.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants were recruted after a participation to a research protocol on i) prevalence of COPD in Canada and ii) early detection of lung cancer. Finally, some participants were recruited following medical consultation with a pneumologist.
You may qualify if:
- Smoking history (≥ 10 pack/year)
You may not qualify if:
- Anticoagulation or coagulation defect
- Hypoxemia or exercise-induced desaturation (SpO2 \< 85%)
- Antibiotic or oral corticosteroid therapy (end of treatment \< 1 month prior to study)
- Anti-inflammatory treatment, exacerbation (\< 3 months)
- Myopathy
- Neuromuscular or locomotor diseases
- Recent cancer
- Unstable cardiac condition
- Asthma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laval Universitylead
- Boehringer Ingelheimcollaborator
- Pfizercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Gagnon P, Casaburi R, Saey D, Porszasz J, Provencher S, Milot J, Bourbeau J, O'Donnell DE, Maltais F. Cluster Analysis in Patients with GOLD 1 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0123626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123626. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25906326DERIVED
Biospecimen
Muscle biopsies Venous blood samples
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
François Maltais, MD
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2011
First Posted
May 26, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 26, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-05