Regional Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: RECLAP Trial
3 other identifiers
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: \- Pancreatic cancer is difficult to treat because by the time most cases are diagnosed, the tumors are too large to be removed surgically. Standard intravenous chemotherapy may shrink some of the tumor, but even with chemotherapy only about 25 percent of patients will live for 1 year following diagnosis. Several preliminary studies have shown that it is safe to give chemotherapy directly into the pancreas in the area of the tumor, and that giving gemcitabine over a longer period increases the amount of drug that is available to the tumor. Researchers are interested in studying whether giving the approved pancreatic cancer chemotherapy drug gemcitabine directly into the pancreas in the area of the cancer and at a slow rate of infusion is a safe and effective treatment. Objectives: \- To test the safety and effectiveness of administering gemcitabine directly to a pancreatic tumor at a slow rate of infusion. Eligibility: \- Individuals at least 18 years of age who have been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer that is currently too large to be removed surgically but has not yet spread to other organs. Design:
- Participants will be screened with a full medical history and physical examination, blood and urine tests, and imaging studies.
- Participants will undergo pancreatic angiography and embolization, during which a catheter will be threaded into the blood vessels near the pancreas and a contrast dye will be used to show the blood vessels supplying the tumor. These blood vessels will then be surgically closed off.
- After the embolization, gemcitabine will be given as an infusion into the area around the tumor over 24 hours.
- Participants will return to the clinical center every 2 weeks after the first infusion for additional infusions of gemcitabine, using the same procedures as above. Participants will be monitored with frequent blood tests and imaging studies.
- Two weeks after the fourth treatment (course 1), participants will have more imaging studies, a physical examination, and blood tests. If the tumor is shrinking, participants will have two more courses of treatment (eight more infusions of gemcitabine).
- Participants will have followup visits every 3 months for 2 years following the last treatment and then every 6 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 23, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2018
CompletedNovember 13, 2019
November 1, 2019
3.5 years
February 10, 2011
December 6, 2017
November 4, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT )
Here is the number of participants with DLT. DLT is defined as follows: All grade 3 or greater toxicities with the exception of Grade 3 constitutional symptoms that persist for less than 72 hours, Grade 3 and 4 myelosuppression (neutrophils and thrombocytopenia) of less than 5 days duration. Grade 3 metabolic/laboratory events that are correctable within 24 hours. Events that are assessed by the principal investigator as clearly unrelated to the agent will not be considered DLTs (e.g., events directly related to catheter insertion, pain related to underlying disease).
Cycle 1 (4 weeks), for up to 6 cycles
MTD (Maximum Tolerated Dose)
The MTD is the highest dose that induces dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in no more than 2 patients among a cohort of 6 patients. If 1 or fewer patients experience dose limiting toxicity than the dose level will define the MTD. Only DLT's that occurred during cycle 1 of each dose level were used to determine the MTD.
Cycle 1 (4 weeks), for up to 6 cycles
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Response Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Every 2 cycles (8 weeks), up to 18 weeks
Response Rate Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
Every 2 cycles (8 weeks), up to 18 weeks
Response Rate Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Every 2 cycles (8 weeks), up to 18 weeks
Response Using Computed Tomography (CT) Perfusion Criteria European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL1)
Every 2 cycles (8 weeks), up to 18 weeks
Median Time to Progression
From first day of treatment to the day of progression, assessed up to 221 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Gemcitabine Dose Escalation
EXPERIMENTALgemcitabine dose escalation
Interventions
Gemcitabine starting dose was 18mg/m(2)/24h via infusion pump on days 1-14. One cycle = 4 weeks for up to six cycles. Three to six patients enrolled per dose cohort. Patients were dosed at successive higher doses until maximum tolerated dose or up to 165 mg/m(2)/24h.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma or clinical and radiographic evidence of pancreatic cancer
- Note: Patients with a limited disease burden outside the pancreas, who have undergone systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease and have achieved a complete response on the metastatic lesions of greater than or equal to 6 months, and have no evidence of disease outside the pancreas at time of enrollment, are eligible.
- Disease must be evaluable
- Disease should be deemed unresectable by the MD Anderson criteria
- Patients may be chemo naive or have received prior chemotherapy (including Gemcitabine) and/or radiation
- Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Must be able to understand and sign the Informed Consent Document
- Clinical performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) less than or equal to 2
- Life expectancy of greater than three months
- Patients of both genders must be willing to practice birth control during and for four months after receiving chemotherapy
- Hematology:
- Absolute neutrophil count greater than 1300/mm(3) without the support of Filgrastim.
- Platelet count greater than 75,000/mm(3).
- Hemoglobin greater than 8.0 g/dl.
- Chemistry:
- +5 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Metastatic disease including malignant ascites
- Women of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or breastfeeding because of the potentially dangerous effects of the chemotherapy on the fetus or infant.
- Active systemic infections, coagulation disorders or other major medical illnesses of the cardiovascular, respiratory or immune system, myocardial infarction, heart failure
- Childs B or C cirrhosis or with evidence of severe portal hypertension by history, endoscopy, or radiologic studies
- Weight less than 40 kg
- Significant ascites, greater than 1000cc in the absence of peritoneal disease
- Concomitant medical problems that would place the patient at an unacceptable risk for the procedure
- Need for concurrent chemotherapy
- Discretion of the principal investigator (PI)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (4)
Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK, Christensen E, Pagliaro L, Colombo M, Rodes J; EASL Panel of Experts on HCC. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol. 2001 Sep;35(3):421-30. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(01)00130-1. No abstract available.
PMID: 11592607BACKGROUNDJemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.
PMID: 19474385BACKGROUNDSener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985-1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00075-7.
PMID: 10401733BACKGROUNDDavis JL, Pandalai P, Ripley RT, Langan RC, Steinberg SM, Walker M, Toomey MA, Levy E, Avital I. Regional chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: RECLAP trial. Trials. 2011 May 19;12:129. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-129.
PMID: 21595953DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Udo Rudloff
- Organization
- National Cancer Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Udo Rudloff, M.D.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2011
First Posted
February 11, 2011
Study Start
January 26, 2011
Primary Completion
July 23, 2014
Study Completion
July 23, 2014
Last Updated
November 13, 2019
Results First Posted
October 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share