NCT01288079

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effect of TC-5214 as a single therapy in patients with major depressive disorder who exhibit inadequate response to antidepressants.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
145

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 major-depressive-disorder

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2011

Geographic Reach
5 countries

63 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2011

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 2, 2011

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 29, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

November 20, 2012

Status Verified

November 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2011

Results QC Date

August 7, 2012

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Major Depressive DisorderMDDMonotherapyInadequate Response to Antidepressant Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Randomization to End of Treatment

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

Study Arms (4)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

TC-5214, 1 mg BID

Drug: TC-5214

2

EXPERIMENTAL

TC-5214, 4 mg BID

Drug: TC-5214

3

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Duloxetine 60 mg Q Day

Drug: Duloxetine

4

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Tablet, oral, twice daily for 8 weeks

12

Capsule, oral, once daily

3

Tablet, oral, twice daily for 8 weeks

4

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent before initiation of any study-related procedures.
  • The patient must have a clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) with inadequate response to no more than one antidepressant.
  • Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test and confirmed use of a highly effective form of birth control before enrollment and until 3 months after their last dose of study drug.
  • Outpatient status at enrollment and randomization.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a lifetime history of bipolar disorder; psychotic disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  • Patients with a history of suicide attempts in the past year and/or seen by the investigator as having a significant history of risk of suicide or homicide.
  • Patients with any significant unstable hepatic, renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, ophthalmologic, neurologic, or any other medical conditions that might confound the study or put the patient at greater risk during study participation.
  • History of stroke or transient ischemic attack, seizures or seizure disorder, head trauma including closed head injury.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (63)

Research Site

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Chino, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Garden Grove, California, United States

Location

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Torrance, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Coral Springs, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

North Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Research Site

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Location

Research Site

Prairie Village, Kansas, United States

Location

Research Site

Flowood, Mississippi, United States

Location

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Location

Research Site

Mason, Ohio, United States

Location

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Research Site

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Location

Research Site

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Research Site

Tallinn, Estonia

Location

Research Site

Tartu, Estonia

Location

Research Site

Helsinki, Finland

Location

Research Site

Jyväskylä, Finland

Location

Research Site

Kuopio, Finland

Location

Research Site

Tampere, Finland

Location

Research Site

Visakhapatnam, Andh Prad, India

Location

Research Site

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Location

Research Site

Bangalore, Kamataka, India

Location

Research Site

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Location

Research Site

Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Location

Research Site

Nashik, Mahara, India

Location

Research Site

Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Location

Research Site

Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Location

Research Site

Varanasi, Uttar Prad, India

Location

Research Site

Kanpur, India

Location

Research Site

Pune, India

Location

Research Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

Research Site

Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan

Location

Research Site

Noda, Chiba, Japan

Location

Research Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

Research Site

Omuta, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sapproro, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research Site

Akashi, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

Research Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan

Location

Research Site

Yatsushiro, Kumamoto, Japan

Location

Research Site

Ukyo-ku ,Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kurashiki-shi, Okayama-ken, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kodaira-shi, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major

Interventions

Duloxetine Hydrochloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiophenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

The study was terminated early and thus only a fraction of the planned number of patients were randomized and many did not complete the study. As a consequence the possibility of interpreting efficacy over an 8 week period is considerably reduced.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Gerard Lynch
Organization
AstraZeneca

Study Officials

  • Hans A Eriksson, MD, PhD, MBA

    AstraZeneca R&D Södertälje

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2011

First Posted

February 2, 2011

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

November 20, 2012

Results First Posted

October 29, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-11

Locations