Paraorbital-Occipital Electric Stimulation in Patients With Optic Neuropathy (BCT_optnerve)
Paraorbital-occipital Alternating Electric Current Stimulation in Patients With Optic Neuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Non-invasive brain stimulation can increase cortical excitability in the visual system, but it is not known if this is of clinical value. The investigators now assessed if repetitive, transcranial alternating current stimulation (rtACS) can improve visual field size in patients with optic nerve damage. The investigators hypothesized that rtACS would improve visual functions with the defective visual field sectors of the visual field (primary outcome measure).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2011
CompletedJanuary 15, 2021
January 1, 2021
3.3 years
January 21, 2011
January 13, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Detection accuracy (DA) change in percent over baseline within defective visual field sectors
Central visus fields were assessed with computer based high-resolution perimetry (HRP). Based on such plots, areas of the visual field were characterized as intact, partially damaged or absolutely impaired (blind).
between baseline and 60 days after stimulation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Visual Parameters 1
baseline to 60 days after stimulation
Visual Parameters 2
baseline to 60 days after stimulation
Visual Parameters 3
baseline to 60 days after stimulation
Visual Parameters 4
baseline to 60 days after stimulation
EEG parameters
baseline to 60 days after stimulation
Study Arms (2)
rtACS (Verum condition)
EXPERIMENTALRepetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS)
Placebo stimulation
PLACEBO COMPARATORno intervention (Sham stimulation)
Interventions
Repetitive, transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) was applied with a multi-channel device generating weak current pulses in predetermined firing bursts of 2 to 9 pulses. The amplitude of each current pulse was below 1000 microA. Current intensity was individually adjusted according to how well patients perceived phosphenes, i.e. any sensation of flickering light in response to the rtACS stimulation.
a clicking sound was presented and the same electrodes montage set-up was used during rtACS and placebo stimulation, except that placebo patients received no current (stimulator turned off).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- residual vision
- patients with optic nerv lesion
- lesion age at least 6 months
- stable visual field defect
You may not qualify if:
- electric or electronic implants such as pace maker
- any metal artefacts in head and truncus
- epilepsia
- photosensitive epilepsy as determines by EEG
- autoimmune illnesses in acute stage
- mental diseases such e.g. schizophrenia etc.
- diabetes causing diabetic retinopathy
- addiction
- high blood pressure
- unstable or high level intraocular pressure (i.e. \> 27 mmHg)
- retinitis pigmentosa
- pathological nystagmus
- presence of an un-operated tumor or tumor recidive
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Magdeburglead
- EBS Technologies GmbHcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Klinik für Neurologie, Charité Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117, Germany
Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Leipziger Str. 44
Magdeburg, 39120, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bernhard A Sabel, Prof. Dr.
University of Magdeburg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Inst Med Psychol
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2011
First Posted
January 25, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01