NCT01279759

Brief Summary

Background: An estimated 4000 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries (ACL) occur annually in Norway (Granan et al., 2004). 1630 primary ACL reconstructions were performed in Norway in 2008 (Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2009). Approximately 120 of these ACL reconstructions were performed at Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital. Physical therapists at our hospital are responsible for postoperative outpatient controls of patients with a reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament. A clinical observation is that stair walking (especially downstairs) may be problematic up to 6 months after ACL reconstruction. One reason may be that the quadriceps muscle is unable to control the knee when the subject is walking downstairs, and that the knee is perceived to be unstable. Other contributing factors may be pain and swelling. It is of interest to know which pre and post operative factors can predict measured and patient reported function 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Previous research shows that predictive factors for clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction are anterior knee pain (Heijne et al., 2009), preoperative electromyography, early postoperative strength (McHugh et al., 2002), preoperative quadriceps muscle strength deficits, meniscus injury and pain (Eitzen et al., 2009), obesity, smoking and serious chondrosis (Kowalchuk et al., 2009). Purpose:

  1. 1.To analyse which pre and post operative factors can predict measured and patient reported function 6 months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction.
  2. 2.To investigate if there is an asymmetry in step time between the affected and unaffected leg during down stairs walking, and if degree of asymmetry decreases during a 6 months period post operatively. Further we want to compare step time asymmetry with other established outcome measures to investigate sensitivity to change over the observation period and also compare the patient group in this study with a control group of healthy subjects to see if asymmetry in the patient group after 6 months is still higher than in healthy subjects.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2010

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2011

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2013

Status Verified

January 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

November 8, 2010

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Predictive FactorsFunction Downstairs walking Step time Symmetry

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Asymmetry in step time between the affected and unaffected leg during down stairs walking.

    A triaxial kinematic sensor (XSens Mtx) positioned at the level of the lower trunk will be used to identify foot strike and separate left and right steps.

    6 months postoperatively

  • Isokinetic muscle strength measured with a fixed dynamometer (isok BI con/con 60/60 240/240 BIODEX).

    6 months postoperatively

  • Single leg hop test for distance, a 6-m timed hop test, a triple hop test for distance, a crossover hop test for distance (Noyes et al, 1991).

    6 months postoperatively

  • Self reported function.

    International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 subjective knee evaluation form.

    6 months post operatively

Secondary Outcomes (27)

  • Pain scores on a visual analog scale

    1 day preoperatively

  • Degree of swelling measured with The Modified Stroke Test (Logerseth at al, 2010).

    1 day preoperatively

  • The circumference around the center of the patella will be measured to assess for swelling around the knee joint.

    1 day preoperatively

  • Passive range of movement compared to the healthy knee, measured with a goniometer.

    1 day preoperatively

  • Isokinetic muscle strength measured with a fixed dynamometer (isok BI con/con 60/60 240/240 BIODEX)

    1 day preoperatively

  • +22 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients planned for reconstruction of the anterioir crucuate ligament with hamstrings graft.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients planned for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings graft at Haraldsplass Deaconess hospital.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with multiligament tears, meniscus suture, other problems that can influence strength testing, functional testing and gait symmetry.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Haraldsplass Deaconess hospital

Bergen, 5096, Norway

RECRUITING

Related Publications (24)

  • Adlerton AK, Moritz U, Moe-Nilssen R. Forceplate and accelerometer measures for evaluating the effect of muscle fatigue on postural control during one-legged stance. Physiother Res Int. 2003;8(4):187-99. doi: 10.1002/pri.289.

    PMID: 14730723BACKGROUND
  • Arvidsson I, Arvidsson H, Eriksson E, Jansson E. Prevention of quadriceps wasting after immobilization: an evaluation of the effect of electrical stimulation. Orthopedics. 1986 Nov;9(11):1519-28. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19861101-08.

    PMID: 3491982BACKGROUND
  • Bjordal JM, Arnly F, Hannestad B, Strand T. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer. Am J Sports Med. 1997 May-Jun;25(3):341-5. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500312.

    PMID: 9167814BACKGROUND
  • Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;22(5):632-44. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200511.

    PMID: 7810787BACKGROUND
  • de Jong SN, van Caspel DR, van Haeff MJ, Saris DB. Functional assessment and muscle strength before and after reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament lesions. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jan;23(1):21-8, 28.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.08.024.

    PMID: 17210423BACKGROUND
  • Drechsler WI, Cramp MC, Scott OM. Changes in muscle strength and EMG median frequency after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Dec;98(6):613-23. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0311-9. Epub 2006 Oct 12.

    PMID: 17036217BACKGROUND
  • Eitzen I, Holm I, Risberg MA. Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43(5):371-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.057059. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

    PMID: 19224907BACKGROUND
  • Helbostad JL, Vereijken B, Hesseberg K, Sletvold O. Altered vision destabilizes gait in older persons. Gait Posture. 2009 Aug;30(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 May 31.

    PMID: 19487126BACKGROUND
  • Hodt-Billington C, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nilssen R. Should trunk movement or footfall parameters quantify gait asymmetry in chronic stroke patients? Gait Posture. 2008 May;27(4):552-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Sep 25.

    PMID: 17897830BACKGROUND
  • Holder-Powell HM, Di Matteo G, Rutherford OM. Do knee injuries have long-term consequences for isometric and dynamic muscle strength? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Aug;85(3-4):310-6. doi: 10.1007/s004210100474.

    PMID: 11560085BACKGROUND
  • Johansson H, Sjolander P, Sojka P. Receptors in the knee joint ligaments and their role in the biomechanics of the joint. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1991;18(5):341-68.

    PMID: 2036801BACKGROUND
  • Kowalchuk DA, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ. Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009 May;25(5):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.014.

    PMID: 19409302BACKGROUND
  • McHugh MP, Tyler TF, Browne MG, Gleim GW, Nicholas SJ. Electromyographic predictors of residual quadriceps muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002 May-Jun;30(3):334-9. doi: 10.1177/03635465020300030601.

    PMID: 12016072BACKGROUND
  • Moe-Nilssen R. A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 2: Gait analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1998 Jun;13(4-5):328-335. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00090-4.

    PMID: 11415804BACKGROUND
  • Moe-Nilssen R. A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 1: The instrument. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1998 Jun;13(4-5):320-327. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00089-8.

    PMID: 11415803BACKGROUND
  • Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad JL, Akra T, Birdedal L, Nygaard HA. Modulation of gait during visual adaptation to dark. J Mot Behav. 2006 Mar;38(2):118-25. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.38.2.118-125.

    PMID: 16531394BACKGROUND
  • Myklebust G, Holm I, Maehlum S, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Clinical, functional, and radiologic outcome in team handball players 6 to 11 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;31(6):981-9. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310063901.

    PMID: 14623667BACKGROUND
  • Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):513-8. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900518.

    PMID: 1962720BACKGROUND
  • Rice DA, McNair PJ. Quadriceps arthrogenic muscle inhibition: neural mechanisms and treatment perspectives. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Dec;40(3):250-66. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

    PMID: 19954822BACKGROUND
  • Sorsdahl AB, Moe-Nilssen R, Strand LI. Test-retest reliability of spatial and temporal gait parameters in children with cerebral palsy as measured by an electronic walkway. Gait Posture. 2008 Jan;27(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Feb 14.

    PMID: 17300940BACKGROUND
  • Young A. Current issues in arthrogenous inhibition. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993 Nov;52(11):829-34. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.11.829.

    PMID: 8250616BACKGROUND
  • Heijne A, Ang BO, Werner S. Predictive factors for 12-month outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Dec;19(6):842-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00852.x. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

    PMID: 19508651BACKGROUND
  • Helbostad JL, Leirfall S, Moe-Nilssen R, Sletvold O. Physical fatigue affects gait characteristics in older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Sep;62(9):1010-5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.9.1010.

    PMID: 17895440BACKGROUND
  • Williams GN, Barrance PJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Buchanan TS. Altered quadriceps control in people with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Jul;36(7):1089-97. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000131959.20666.11.

    PMID: 15235310BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Willemijn Vervaat, MSc

    Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Willemijn Vervaat, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2010

First Posted

January 19, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2015

Study Completion

February 1, 2015

Last Updated

January 18, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-01

Locations