NCT01270139

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that the nanoburning is a very challenging technique to demolish and reverse the plaque especially in combination with stem cell technologies promising the functional restoration of the vessel wall. The completed (in July 2012) interventional three arms (n=180) first-in-man trial (the NANOM-FIM trial) assessed (NCT01270139) the safety and feasibility of two delivery techniques for nanoparticles (NP), and plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) of atherosclerotic lesions. Patients were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either (1) nano-intervention with delivery of silica-gold NP in mini-surgery implanted bioengineered on-artery patch (n=60), or (2) nano-intervention with delivery of silica-gold iron-bearing NP with targeted micro-bubbles or stem cells in hands of magnetic navigation system (n=60) versus (3) stent implantation (n=60). The primary outcome was TAV at 12 months. The observational prospective cohort analysis (an amendment to the protocol of August 29th 2012 with a decision to extend a 1-year study for another 4 years with the assessment of the 5-year clinical outcomes both retro- and prospectively) of the long-term clinical outcomes at the intention-to-treat population of 180 patients with CAD and angiographic SYNTAX score ≤22 enrolled initially to NANOM-FIM trial will be performed at 5 years after the intervention. The primary outcome will be a MACE-free survival. The secondary outcomes will be MACE, cardiac death, TLR (target lesion revascularization) and TVR (target vessel revascularization). Imaging endpoints will be assessed pre-, post- procedure and at 12-month follow-up. Clinical endpoints will be analyzed at the baseline and at 12 and 60-month follow-up (the release of results is expected after October 2016). Parameters of nanotoxicity will be assessed. The independent adjudication analysis of the clinical outcomes is scheduled in 2017-2019. The subset post-hoc analysis will be conducted at 1- and 5-year follow-up (by the Amendment of August 29th 2012). At the first subset, patients underwent stenting with XIENCE V stent proximal to the site of nano-intervention (n=13). Subjects in the second subset were undergone drug-coated balloon pre-dilation with further nano-technique (n=20). Lesions in patients of the third subset were not prepared for the nano-approach (n=147) (neither stenting nor balloon angioplasty). The analysis will be performed and results will be released after 2018 with the same clinical outcomes. This project and related manuscripts were not prepared or funded in any part by a commercial organization. Nanoparticles and biomedical equipment were supplied free for the study by the non-profit Agiko and De Haar Research Task Force (Rotterdam-Amsterdam, the Netherlands). All rights of the authors are reserved. The access of the international academic or governmental organizations to the essential and primary data of the trial is restricted by the Russian governmental authorities due to the interest of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB).

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2007

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2009

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 30, 2010

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 5, 2011

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 30, 2012

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 30, 2010

Results QC Date

July 26, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

nanoparticlesmesenchymal stem cellplasmonicsatherosclerosisIVUSstenting

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Total Atheroma Volume

    Total atheroma volume (TAV, plaque-media volume, mm3) at 12 months. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) were performed pre-, post-procedure and at 12-month follow-up after a bolus infusion of i.c. nitrate. QCA was undergone with the CAAS II analysis system (Pie Medical B.V., Maastricht, The Netherlands) with analysis of different QCA parameters such as minimal lumen diameter, maximum lumen diameter, reference diameter, diameter stenosis, lesion length, percent atheroma volume (PAV), total atheroma volume (TAV), and lumen volume.

    at 12-month follow-up

  • MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events)-Free Survival

    MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events)-free survival reflects per cent of survived patients without MACE. An amendment to the protocol was approved on August 29th 2012 with a decision to extend a 1-year study for another 4 years with the assessment of the 5-year clinical outcomes both retro- and prospectively.

    at 60 months follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Per Cent of Fibro-fatty Component

    at 12-month follow-up

  • Event Free Survival

    at 12-month follow-up

  • Restenosis Rate

    at 12-month follow-up

  • Late Definite Thrombosis

    at 12-month follow-up

  • Coronary Vasomotion - Mean Lumen Diameter After Infusion of Acetylcholine 10-6 M

    at 12-month follow-up

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Nano group

EXPERIMENTAL

60 patients in Nano group were treated with transplantation of nanoparticles (NP), particularly with a bioengineered patch that was grown with allogenous stem cells pre-cultivated in the medium with NP. After the admission, patients were examined with QCA, and allocated to the trial. The implantation of the patch onto the artery was undergone by the minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS CABG) with fixation of the graft to the epicardial myocardium. MICS CABG implies a beating-heart multi-vessel heart surgery performed through several small incisions under direct vision through an anterolateral mini-thoracotomy in the 4th-6th intercostal spaces. The patients can expect high quality of life resuming all everyday activities within a few weeks of their operation. NP were activated with NIR laser at 7 days after the intervention. Patients were treated with bolus of bivalirudin on the day of NP detonation.

Procedure: Transplantation of nanoparticles

Ferro group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

60 patients in Ferro group were managed with transplantation of iron-bearing nanoparticles (NP), particularly with intracoronary infusion of allogenous stem cells or CD68 targeted micro-bubbles pre-cultivated in the medium with iron-bearing NP. Cells and/ or micro-bubbles were infused with QCA- and IVUS-guidance to the target coronary artery via micro-catheter on the day of admission. The destruction of CD68 targeted micro-bubbles was obtained by using a Sonos 5500 machine with an S3 transducer operating in ultraharmonic mode (transmit, 1.3MHz/ receive, 3.6 MHz) with a mechanical index of 1.5 and a depth of 4 cm. The AXIOM Artis dBC (Siemens) magnetic navigation system was used for precise delivery of NP to the atheroma through two permanent computer-controlled external magnets generating a navigational magnetic field of 0.08 Tesla in any direction. NP were detonated with NIR laser under the protection of anti-platelet therapy.

Procedure: Transplantation of iron-bearing nanoparticles

Stenting control

OTHER

In case of control group (stenting control), XIENCE V stent was implanted to 60 patients. Patients with a single de novo native coronary stenosis of less than 12 mm lesion length, more than 50% stenosis and reference diameter of 3.0 mm as assessed by online QCA were stented by a single stent of 3.0 x 18 mm. The procedure of implantation had to be performed according to common interventional practices including the administration of intracoronary nitroglycerine 0.2 mg of glycerol trinitrate or isosorbide dinitrate and intra-arterial heparin (50-100 U/kg body weight). Predilation with a conventional balloon catheter was recommended before DES deployment according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The protocol recommended the study stent should cover 2 mm of non-diseased tissue on either side of the target lesion. Postdilatation was allowed with a balloon that was shorter than was the study device.

Device: Stenting

Interventions

60 patients into nanogroup with the use of 60/15-70/40 nm silica-gold nanoparticles (NPs) transplanted by endoscopic cardiac surgery in the composition of bioengineered on-artery patch grown on the basis of biopolymeric scaffold and host circulating CD45-CD34-CD73+CD105+ progenitor cells

Nano group

60 - into ferro-magnetic group with 60/15-70/40 nm silica-gold iron-bearing NPs with delivery in hand of magnetic navigation system

Ferro group
StentingDEVICE

60 - in sirolimus-eluting stenting control

Also known as: XIENCE V
Stenting control

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age 45-65 years old
  • male and female
  • single- or multi-vessel CAD with flow-limiting lesions
  • no indications for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
  • stable angina with indications for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)
  • NYHA (New York Heart Association) I-III functional class of heart failure (HF)
  • treated hypertension (in supine position: systole \>140 mm Hg, diastole \>90 mm Hg)
  • de novo treated.

You may not qualify if:

  • non-compliance,
  • angiographic SYNTAX score ≥23
  • history of myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, PCI or CABG, atrial fibrillation or other dysrhythmias, stroke
  • presence of indications for CABG
  • presence of contraindications for PCI or CABG
  • NYHA IV functional class of HF
  • diabetes mellitus (in case of fasting glucose \>7.0 mM/L or random glucose \>11.0 mM/L)
  • untreated hypertension
  • asthma
  • known hypersensitivity or contraindications to anti-platelet drugs
  • contrast sensitivity
  • participation to any drug- or intervention-investigation during the previous 60 days

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

De Haar Research Task Force

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1069CD, Netherlands

Location

Ural Center of Modern Nanotechnologies, Institute of Natural Sciences, Ural Federal University

Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620000, Russia

Location

Transfiguration Clinic

Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620078, Russia

Location

Ural Institute of Cardiology

Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620144, Russia

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Kharlamov AN, Gabinsky JL. Plasmonic photothermic and stem cell therapy of atherosclerotic plaque as a novel nanotool for angioplasty and artery remodeling. Rejuvenation Res. 2012 Apr;15(2):222-30. doi: 10.1089/rej.2011.1305.

    PMID: 22533437BACKGROUND
  • Kharlamov AN. Plasmonic photothermal therapy for atheroregression below Glagov threshold. Future Cardiol. 2013 May;9(3):405-25. doi: 10.2217/fca.13.16.

    PMID: 23668744BACKGROUND
  • Kharlamov AN. Cardiovascular burden and percutaneous interventions in Russian Federation: systematic epidemiological update. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Feb;7(1):60-84. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.08.10.

    PMID: 28164014BACKGROUND
  • Kharlamov AN. Glimpse into the Future of Nanotheranostic Strategies for Regression of Atherosclerosis through the Prism of Systems Biomedicine: Systematic Review of Innovations from Multifunctional Nanoformulations to Devices on Chip. Current Nanomedicine 6(3): 186-218, 2016. doi: 10.2174/2468187306666161121142756.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kharlamov AN, Zubarev IV, Shishkina EV, Shur VY. Nanoparticles for treatment of atherosclerosis: challenges of plasmonic photothermal therapy in translational studies. Future Cardiol. 2018 Mar;14(2):109-114. doi: 10.2217/fca-2017-0051. Epub 2018 Jan 16. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29336170BACKGROUND
  • Kharlamov AN, Tyurnina AE, Veselova VS, Kovtun OP, Shur VY, Gabinsky JL. Silica-gold nanoparticles for atheroprotective management of plaques: results of the NANOM-FIM trial. Nanoscale. 2015 May 7;7(17):8003-15. doi: 10.1039/c5nr01050k.

  • Kharlamov AN, Feinstein JA, Cramer JA, Boothroyd JA, Shishkina EV, Shur V. Plasmonic photothermal therapy of atherosclerosis with nanoparticles: long-term outcomes and safety in NANOM-FIM trial. Future Cardiol. 2017 Jul;13(4):345-363. doi: 10.2217/fca-2017-0009. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Angina, StableHeart FailureAtherosclerosis

Interventions

Stents

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Angina PectorisMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesChest PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostheses and ImplantsEquipment and Supplies

Limitations and Caveats

The study was launched as a PROBE trial. But randomization was broken because of the specific study design, where procedures differ significantly, and impossibility to calculate sample size due to absolute novelty of the technology.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Alexander Kharlamov
Organization
Ural Institute of Cardiology

Study Officials

  • Jan Gabinsky, MD, PhD, DSc

    Ural Institute of Cardiology

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Olga Kovtun, MD, PhD

    Ural State Medical University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Alexander Kharlamov, M.D., FESC, FACC, FEACVI

    De Haar Research Task Force

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research manager

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2010

First Posted

January 5, 2011

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion

April 1, 2009

Study Completion

August 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 17, 2021

Results First Posted

August 30, 2012

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The raw data will be partially shared (a Protocol for NANOM-FIM trial and related DREAM project; raw data with atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy) in Mendeley Datasets and ResearchGate without any additional dissemination.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
The data-sets will be provided in Mendeley and ResearchGate being accompanied to the published articles in 2013-2020.
Access Criteria
There are no specific criteria, but the access to the raw data is partly restricted by the Russian Federal Security Service for indefinite time.
More information

Available IPD Datasets

Study Protocol (doi: 10.13140/2.1.3109.5847)Access
Study Protocol (doi: 10.17632/rkz98ttjrd.1)Access
Individual Participant Data Set (doi: 10.17632/5hzb3249hn.1)Access
Protocol and Proposal of the Research Project (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4913)Access

Locations