NCT01262430

Brief Summary

The OtisMed Custom-fit system for total knee replacements replaces conventional surgical techniques for templating and intra-operative instrumentation with a preoperative virtual surgery process that utilizes 3D models of the affected knee from a pre-operative MRI or CT image. The 3D model of the affected knee is processed with a proprietary algorithm that virtually alters it to its pre-arthritic state by filling articular defects, removing osteophytes, and approximating the joint surface. The software then shape matches the knee replacement femoral and tibial components to the preathritic knee model and aligns the femoral component to the functional flexion-extension axis of the femur. The final preoperative step is the machining of custom biocompatible plastic cutting blocks that fit the arthritic knee. These cutting blocks are used during the knee replacement surgery to guide the bone cuts so that the replacement components are aligned for the individual patient. In this study we propose to compare patients who have received total knee replacement components with the OtisMed Custom-fit procedure to those who have had the same components implanted in the conventional manner with Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS). The primary outcome will be micromotion of tibial and femoral implants at 1 and 2 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include subjective outcomes, accelerometric gait analysis, bone mineral density, full leg alignment, change in intra-operative frontal plane alignment, intra-operative deviations from the surgical plan, surgery duration, OR turnover time, number of instrument pans used, and length of hospital stay.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2010

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 17, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2011

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 21, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

December 10, 2010

Last Update Submit

August 19, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Osteoarthritis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • RSA migration

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • RSA inducible displacement

    1 year

  • Questionnaires

    2 years

  • DEXA

    2 years

  • Gait Analysis (accelerometric)

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

OtisMed

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: OtisMed

Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS)

Interventions

OtisMedPROCEDURE

OtisMed Custom-fit Shapematching Guides

Also known as: Styrker OtisMed Custom-fit Shapematching Guides
OtisMed

Stryker Navigation System

Also known as: Stryker precisioN Knee Navigation System
Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee indicating surgical intervention
  • Between the ages of 21 and 80 inclusive
  • Ability to give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant co-morbidity affecting ability to ambulate
  • Flexion contracture greater than 15°
  • Extension lag greater than 10°
  • Tibial subluxation greater than 10 mm on standing AP radiograph
  • Prior arthroplasty, patellectomy or osteotomy with the affected knee
  • Lateral or medial collateral ligament instability (\> 10° varus/valgus)
  • Leg length discrepancy greater than 10 mm
  • Pregnancy
  • Active or prior infection
  • Morbid Obesity (BMI \> 40)
  • Medical condition precluding major surgery
  • Severe osteoporosis or osteopenia
  • Neuromuscular impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Capital District Health Authority

Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4A7, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Interventions

Surgery, Computer-Assisted

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Michael Dunbar

    Dalhousie University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, FRCSC, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2010

First Posted

December 17, 2010

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2019

Last Updated

August 21, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Locations