Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in Cemented Versus Cementless Hip Resurfacing
Randomized Clinical Trial of a Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Component for Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing Assessing Bone Mineral Density
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the bone mineral density of patients who have undergone either cemented or cementless hip resurfacing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedApril 2, 2018
March 1, 2018
4.6 years
September 30, 2009
March 29, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent change in BMD (g/cm2)
The primary outcome is percent change in BMD (g/cm2) from baseline to the 1-year post-operative interval, as measured radiographically in zone L1. Analysis of periprosthetic BMD will be achieved using 6 zones of the femoral neck, which have been used in previous studies
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Implant Migration
24 months
Harris Hip Score (HHS) Questionnaire
24 months
WOMAC Questionnaire to assess functionality
24 months
RAND-36 Item Health Survey
24 months
UCLA Activity Score
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Cementless Hip Resurfacing
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized into the Cementless Hip Resurfacing Group will have their hip resurfaced with the cementless Cormet / Corin Hip Resurfacing System.
Cemented Hip Resurfacing
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized into the Cemented Hip Resurfacing Group will have their hip resurfaced with the cemented Conserve Plus Total Resurfacing Hip System.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be undergoing primary hip surgery for Noninflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease
- must be skeletally mature, as determined by Risser sign or reaching 18 years of age
- Is reasonable expectation that patient will remain available for all FU's scheduled over course of 5 years
You may not qualify if:
- Previous fusions, acute femoral neck fractures, and above knee amputations
- evidence of active local infection
- neurologic or musculoskeletal disease that may adversely affect gait or weight bearing
- having previously undergone ipsilateral hemi resurfacing, total resurfacing, total bipolar, unipolar or total hip replacement device
- BMI \>35
- neuropathic joints
- severe documented psychiatric disease
- patients requiring structural bone grafts
- documented allergy to cobalt chromium molybdenum
- ipsilateral girdlestone
- sickle cell disease
- significant femoral head or neck deformity, or significant acetabular wall deficiency
- patients with renal failure, defined as serum creatinine greater that 180 µmol/L
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institutelead
- Corincollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ottawa General Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H8L6, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Tice A, Kim P, Dinh L, Ryu JJ, Beaule PE. A randomised controlled trial of cemented and cementless femoral components for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a bone mineral density study. Bone Joint J. 2015 Dec;97-B(12):1608-14. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.36110.
PMID: 26637673RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr. Paul Beaule, MD, FRCSC
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2009
First Posted
May 13, 2011
Study Start
May 15, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03