Breast Displacement and CT Radiation Dose
Chrysalis
Effect of Displacement During Computed Tomography on Breast Radiation Dose and Image Quality
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary hypothesis of this study is that breast displacement out of the direct plane of imaging during computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen will reduce effective radiation dose to the female breast. Secondary hypotheses are that image noise and artifacts will also be decreased.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 5, 2013
CompletedJuly 6, 2018
June 1, 2018
1.2 years
December 8, 2010
June 18, 2013
June 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Skin Entrance Radiation Dose During Computed Tomography (CT)
Skin entrance radiation doses will be measured with Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) affixed to the subject's chest and breast during CT of the abdomen. TLD #1 is at the inframammary fold, serving as internal control for each subject. Three additional TLDs (#2-4) are affixed to the subject's breast at 3 pre-ascribed locations. The same is done for the right and left breasts (8 TLDs total). TLDs will then be submitted to Landaeur for measurement.
from time potential subject approached about possible enrollment to time device and TLDs were removed, on average 1 hour
Relative Skin Entrance Radiation Dose in % During Computed Tomography (CT)
Relative skin entrance dose at the breast (group mean of patient's average skin entrance dose at TLDs 2-4) divided by skin entrance dose at the inframammary TLD (TLD 1) in %. For each patient, doses at TLDs 2-4 were averaged, and then the group mean of this was divided by the group mean at the inframammary TLD, then multiplied by 100 to get % dose. A relative dose of 20% means that the skin entrance dose at the breast was 20% of the skin entrance dose at the inframammary fold.
from time potential subject approached about possible enrollment to time device and TLDs were removed, on average 1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (2)
CT Image Noise
two months
Number of Participants With Presence of Artifacts Based on CT Image Quality
two months
Study Arms (2)
Standard CT
NO INTERVENTIONWomen assigned to undergo CT using the standard dose reduction methods (including bismuth shielding and tube current modulation) but without the Chrysalis device.
Chrysalis CT
EXPERIMENTALWomen assigned to undergo CT using the standard dose reduction methods (including bismuth shielding and tube current modulation) plus application of the Chrysalis device for breast displacement.
Interventions
Chrysalis is a cloth device secured with velcro and buckles around the upper abdomen and chest following manual cephalad breast displacement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- scheduled for CT of the abdomen and pelvis at Harborview Medical Center
- able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide written consent for self (minor, intubated, sedated, mentally incapacitated, in excessive physical distress)
- Chest or breast surgery within the previous 8 weeks
- Breast implants
- Open wounds to the chest wall
- Fractures of the ribs or spine within the previous 3 months
- Patients requiring oxygen therapy
- Mastectomy
- Breast radiation therapy
- Scarring to the breasts which would prevent displacement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Related Publications (7)
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, Land C. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2071-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440.
PMID: 20008689BACKGROUNDSmith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427.
PMID: 20008690BACKGROUNDHurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Reiman RE, Paulson EK, Frush DP, Nguyen GT, Toncheva GI, Goodman PC. Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1718-22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1917.
PMID: 16714665BACKGROUNDParker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, Chung JK, Broga DW, Sethi NN. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Nov;185(5):1228-33. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.0770.
PMID: 16247139BACKGROUNDPajor L, Kalman E, Koszegi T. Cholesteryl hemisuccinate's inductive effect on membrane rigidization regarding both, its remodelling of the cells' surface receptor pattern and its decreasing the natural killer susceptibility of K-562 cells. Acta Biol Hung. 1991;42(4):371-83.
PMID: 1841487BACKGROUNDYilmaz MH, Albayram S, Yasar D, Ozer H, Adaletli I, Selcuk D, Akman C, Altug A. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Jan-Feb;31(1):138-42. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000235070.50055.e6.
PMID: 17259846BACKGROUNDKang M, Ragan BG, Park JH. Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials. J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):215-21. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.215.
PMID: 18345348BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Claire Sandstrom
- Organization
- University of Washington
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claire K Sandstrom, MD
University of Washington Department of Radiology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Fellow, Section of Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2010
First Posted
December 16, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 6, 2018
Results First Posted
November 5, 2013
Record last verified: 2018-06