Comparison of Two Solvents Used With Chemotherapy Agent for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
812
1 country
1
Brief Summary
TACE is considered the standard treatment for unresectable HCC and is widely used as a palliative treatment. However there is no consensus of the protocol of TACE.One of the variation is does the stability of the suspension by emulsified the lipiodol and the contrast medium used to dissolve the anticancer agents really effect the survival.Thus the investigators conduct this prospective,randomized controlled study to find out if the different method of preparing chemotheraputic drugs can cause a different survival benefit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for phase_3 hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedMarch 6, 2019
March 1, 2019
6 years
December 13, 2010
March 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
overall survival
3 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time to progression
3 year
Study Arms (2)
group1
EXPERIMENTALChemoembolization with solvent with specific gravity less than lipiodol
group2
EXPERIMENTALChemoembolization with Solvent with specific gravity equivalent to lipiodol
Interventions
TACE with chemotherapy drugs (EADM 50mg, lobaplatin 50mg, and MMC 6mg)dissolved in distilled water and emulsified lipiodol followed embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA)
TACE with chemotherapy drugs (EADM 50mg, lobaplatin 50mg, and MMC 6mg)dissolved in water-soluble contrast medium and distilled water,then emulsified with lipiodol followed embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients \> 18 years and \<=70 years of age with a diagnosis of HCC
- BCLC B stage disease
- Not amendable to surgical resection ,local ablative therapy and any other cured treatment.
- Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured according to EASL criteria. The lesion has not been previously treated with TACE, surgery, radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection, or cryoablation.
- No Cirrhosis or cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only
- Not pregnant or breast-feeding patients
- No significant renal impairment (creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/minute) or patients on dialysis
- The following laboratory parameters:
- Platelet count ≥ 60,000/µL
- Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL Serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L
- ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal
- INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1,500/mm3
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Known history of HIV
- History of organ allograft
- Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
- Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis.
- Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
- Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event \> CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
- Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
- Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease
- severe Arterioportal Shunts or Arteria vein Shunts
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cancer Center Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Related Publications (9)
Shin SW. The current practice of transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Radiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;10(5):425-34. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.5.425. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
PMID: 19721826RESULTLo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002 May;35(5):1164-71. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33156.
PMID: 11981766RESULTLlovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Sola R, Rodes J, Bruix J; Barcelona Liver Cancer Group. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1734-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X.
PMID: 12049862RESULTRaoul JL, Heresbach D, Bretagne JF, Ferrer DB, Duvauferrier R, Bourguet P, Messner M, Gosselin M. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinomas. A study of the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. Cancer. 1992 Aug 1;70(3):585-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920801)70:33.0.co;2-#.
PMID: 1320447RESULTBruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36. doi: 10.1002/hep.20933. No abstract available.
PMID: 16250051RESULTTakaki Y, Kaminou T, Shabana M, Ihaya T, Otsubo K, Ogawa T. Suitable blending method of lipiodol-cisplatin in transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of sustained release and accumulation nature. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Jan-Feb;55(81):202-6.
PMID: 18507107RESULTde Baere T, Zhang X, Aubert B, Harry G, Lagrange C, Ropers J, Dufaux J, Lumbroso J, Rougier P, Ducreux M, Roche A. Quantification of tumor uptake of iodized oils and emulsions of iodized oils: experimental study. Radiology. 1996 Dec;201(3):731-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939223.
PMID: 8939223RESULTTakayasu K, Shima Y, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N, Yamada T, Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Hirohashi S. Hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with intraarterial iodized oil with and without chemotherapeutic agents. Radiology. 1987 May;163(2):345-51. doi: 10.1148/radiology.163.2.3031724.
PMID: 3031724RESULTTzeng WS, Wu RH, Chang SC, Chou CK, Lin CY, Chen JJ, Yang SC, Lin CH. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media solvents used with an epirubicin-based agent for transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Mar;19(3):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.10.021.
PMID: 18295692RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ming Shi
Cancer Center, Sun Yat-set University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2010
First Posted
December 14, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03