NCT01256333

Brief Summary

Despite improving in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), this affection keep an elevate rate of death. The strategy of mechanical ventilation is more and more under definite protocol, following large strength randomized studies. Although, it doesn't exist today element allowing to adjust the level of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with improvement in patient's survival. The investigators proposed in this study to determinate the level of PEEP adjust to obtain the better arterial oxygen transport (TaO2). The investigators going to conduct a physiologic, observational, none controlled study. All patients hospitalized in intensive care unit of Pontchaillou hospital with ARDS criteria and without specific exclusion criteria will be included. Primary objective is to looking for the optimum level of PEEP for TaO2.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2010

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2013

Status Verified

July 1, 2013

First QC Date

December 6, 2010

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2013

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Determinate the Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) level achieving the best arterial oxygen transport (TaO2)

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Evolution of pulmonary gas exchanges

    1 year

  • Evolution of respiratory mechanism parameters

    1 year

  • evolution of circulatory parameters and needs of catecholamine during the study

    1 year

  • Appearance of secondary effects due to mechanical ventilation

    1 year

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

You may qualify if:

  • patient presenting a Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrone (ARDS) definite by : acute respiratory failure, bilateral alveolo-interstitial infiltrate on chest radiography, absence of increased left ventricular filling pressure, partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/Fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2) \<200 and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) \> or equal to 5 cmH2O
  • Need to invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Precedent criteria persisting at least 6 hours
  • Haemoglobin \> 8g/dl
  • Ramsay score at 6

You may not qualify if:

  • Participation to en other study on the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrone (ARDS) with the same end-point
  • Presence of external circulatory assist
  • Left Ventricular Ejection fraction (LVEF)or Left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF)\< 40% after correction of hypovolemia and/or vasoplegia
  • Infusion of inotrope
  • Presence of Acute Pulmonary Heart
  • Following procedure : ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation(ECMO), prone position, inhalation of Nitrogen dioxyde
  • Presence of a chest tube
  • Pregnant or nursing mother
  • Less than 18 years old
  • Complete arrhythmia by atrial fibrillation
  • Person under justice protection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Perigueux Hospital

Périgueux, Aquitaine, 24019, France

Location

Rennes University Hospital

Rennes, Britanny, 35033, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration Disorders

Study Officials

  • Loic Chimot

    CH de Périgueux

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2010

First Posted

December 8, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 3, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-07

Locations