Signature Versus Computer Assisted Surgery Study
A Comparison of Signature Custom Cutting Guides and Computer Assisted Surgery Techniques With the Vanguard Knee System
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the data collection is to document the performance and clinical outcomes of the Vanguard Knee using Signature Custom Cutting Guides and Computer Assisted Surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedJune 19, 2017
June 1, 2017
5.7 years
May 12, 2010
June 16, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mechanical Alignment
Angle between femoral head, center of knee, and talus.
Data Collected at 0-10 Weeks; but Analyzed at Completion of Study
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Knee Society Objective Score
Completion of Study
Study Arms (2)
Signature Custom Cutting Guides
OTHERPatients receiving a Vanguard Total Knee implanted utilizing non implantable Signature Cutting Guides Surgical Technique.
CAS (Computer Assisted Surgery)
OTHERPatients receiving a Vanguard Total Knee implanted utilizing non implantable Computer Assisted Surgery Technique.
Interventions
Patients indicated for a total knee replacement utilizing the Vanguard Total Knee System.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- These indications are stated below:
- Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved.
- Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity.
- Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous joint replacement procedure.
- The Regenerex™ femoral augments are indicated for use with the Vanguard® Total Knee System.
- The Regenerex™ tibial augments are indicated for use with standard and offset Biomet® Tibial Trays.
- Patient selection factors to be considered include:
- Need to obtain pain relief and improve function
- Ability and willingness of the patient to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level
- A good nutritional state of the patient, and
- The patient must have reached full skeletal maturity
- Femoral components and tibial tray components with porous coatings are indicated for cemented and uncemented biological fixation application. Non-coated (Interlok™) devices and all polyethylene patellar components are indicated for cemented application only.
You may not qualify if:
- Absolute contraindications include: infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis
- Relative contraindications include:
- Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who is incapable of following directions
- Osteoporosis
- Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation,
- Osteomalacia
- Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
- Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram
- Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, neuromuscular disease
- Incomplete or deficient soft tissue surrounding the knee.
- Biomet® Microplasty™ Tibial Trays are contraindicated for use with constrained bearings.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zimmer Biometlead
Study Sites (1)
Russells Hall Hospital
Dudley, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Russell A Schenck, PhD
Zimmer Biomet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2010
First Posted
December 8, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06