NCT00754637

Brief Summary

The purpose of this prospective clinical data-collection is to document the performance and clinical outcomes of the Microplasty Tibial Tray.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2009

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 18, 2008

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2009

Completed
13 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

13 years

First QC Date

September 17, 2008

Last Update Submit

June 19, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

JointOsteoarthritisAvascular Necrosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Knee Society Score

    5 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Radiographic Data

    10 Years

Study Arms (1)

510(k) Inclusion Criteria

Any person meeting the inclusion criteria for the device may be included in this study. These patients tend to be those seeking relief from painful or debilitating knee joint disease.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients in need of relief frm painful or disabling Joint Disease, and meeting the 510(k) inclusion criteria on the cleared device.

You may qualify if:

  • Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved.
  • Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity.
  • Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous joint replacement procedure.
  • Patient selection factors to be considered include:
  • Need to obtain pain relief and improve function
  • Ability and willingness of the patient to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level
  • A good nutritional state of the patient, and
  • The patient must have reached full skeletal maturity
  • Non-coated (Interlock®) devices are indicated for cemented application only.

You may not qualify if:

  • Absolute contraindications include: infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis.
  • Relative contraindications include:
  • Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions,
  • Osteoporosis,
  • Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation,
  • Osteomalacia,
  • Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site,
  • Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram,
  • Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, neuromuscular disease,
  • Incomplete or deficient soft tissue surrounding the knee.
  • Biomet Microplasty™ Tibial Trays are contraindicated for use with constrained bearings.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The DeClaire Knee & Orthopaedic Institute

Rochester Hills, Michigan, 48307, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.

    PMID: 2805470BACKGROUND
  • Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Feb;66(2):228-41.

    PMID: 6693450BACKGROUND
  • Brooks, et al. (Eds.). (2003) The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Joint DiseasesOsteoarthritisOsteonecrosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal DiseasesArthritisRheumatic DiseasesBone DiseasesNecrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ken Beres, MD

    Zimmer Biomet

    STUDY DIRECTOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2008

First Posted

September 18, 2008

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion

December 1, 2022

Study Completion

June 1, 2023

Last Updated

June 21, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-06

Locations