The Effects of Dopamine on Reward Processing
2 other identifiers
interventional
159
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a single low dose of the D2/D3 antagonist amisulpride on reward processing. More generally, this study will test the role of dopamine (a naturally occurring brain chemical) in depression. Hypotheses: Administration of a single low dose of the D2/D3 antagonist amisulpride will (1) improve performance in a behavioral task assessing learning from feedback and (2) boost activation in reward-related brain regions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Feb 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 18, 2018
CompletedApril 27, 2018
April 1, 2018
4.2 years
December 1, 2010
May 2, 2017
April 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Effect on PST Reward Learning
This statistic shows the effect (beta) that the combination of diagnosis and drug has on the ability to learn from rewards during a Probabilistic Selection Task (PST). A higher effect size indicates greater ability to learn from reward trials.
administered after scan
Effect on PST Penalty Learning
This statistic shows the effect (beta) that the combination of diagnosis and drug has on the ability to learn from penalties during a Probabilistic Selection Task (PST). A higher effect size indicates greater ability to learn from penalty trials.
administered after scan
Effect on Caudate Response to Cues
This statistic shows the effect (beta) that the combination of diagnosis and drug has on caudate activation after presentation of a cue. Positive values indicate an increase in activation relative to baseline.
Scan session
Effect on NAcc Response to Cues
This statistic shows the effect (beta) that the combination of diagnosis and drug has on nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation after presentation of a cue. Positive values indicate an increase in activation relative to baseline.
Scan session
Putamen Response to Cues
This statistic shows the effect (beta) that the combination of diagnosis and drug has on putamen activation after presentation of a cue. Positive values indicate an increase in activation relative to baseline.
Scan session
Effect on Caudate Response to Reward
This statistic shows the effect (beta) that the combination of diagnosis and drug has on caudate activation after Reward outcomes. Positive values indicate an increase in activation relative to baseline.
During scan session
Effect on NAcc Response to Reward
This statistic shows the effect (beta) that the combination of diagnosis and drug has on nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation after reward outcomes. Positive values indicate an increase in activation relative to baseline.
During scan session
Effect on Putamen Response to Reward
This statistic shows the effect (beta) that the combination of diagnosis and drug has on putamen activation (beta) after reward outcomes. Positive values indicate an increase in activation relative to baseline.
During scan session
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Effect on Caudate-dACC Connectivity After Reward
During scan session
Effect on NAcc-MCC Connectivity After Reward
During scan session
Study Arms (4)
MDD-amisulpride
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects experiencing a current episode of major depression who are randomized to receive amisulpride
MDD-placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects experiencing a current episode of major depression who are randomized to receive placebo
HC-amisulpride
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects having no history of mental disorder (healthy controls, HC) who are randomized to receive amisulpride
HC-placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects having no history of mental disorder who are randomized to receive placebo
Interventions
single low-dose pharmacological challenge, 50 mg amisulpride
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) diagnostic criteria for MDD, diagnosed with the use of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID);
- Written informed consent;
- Both genders and all ethnic origins, age between 18 and 45;
- A baseline score \> 16 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) 17-item version;
- Right-handed.
- Absence of any psychotropic medications for at least 2 weeks:
- weeks for fluoxetine,
- months for neuroleptics,
- weeks for benzodiazepines,
- weeks for any other antidepressants.
- Absence of medical, neurological, and psychiatric illness (including alcohol and substance abuse), as assessed by subject history and a structured clinical interview (SCID-I/NP);
- Written informed consent;
- Both genders and all ethnic origins, age between 18 and 45;
- Right-handed;
- Absence of any medications for at least 3 weeks;
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with suicidal ideation where outpatient treatment is determined unsafe by the study clinician. These patients will be immediately referred to appropriate clinical treatment;
- Pregnant women or women of childbearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (defined as oral contraceptive pill or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, s/p tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy);
- Serious or unstable medical illness, including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological or hematologic disease;
- Lifetime history of seizure disorder;
- More than five instances of lifetime cocaine or stimulant use (e.g., amphetamine, cocaine, methamphetamine);
- Use of dopaminergic drugs (including methylphenidate) within the last 6 months;
- Lifetime history or current diagnosis of dementia, or a score of \< 26 on the Mini Mental Status Examination at the screening visit;
- Lifetime history of adverse drug reactions or allergy to the study drug (amisulpride);
- Patients with mood congruent or mood incongruent psychotic features;
- Current use of other psychotropic drugs;
- Clinical or laboratory evidence of hypothyroidism;
- Patients with a lifetime history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT);
- Patients with renal insufficiency;
- Failure to meet standard MRI safety requirements
- Electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine: outside the normal range (also ruling out renal insufficiency);
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mclean Hospitallead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
McLean Hospital
Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478, United States
Related Publications (2)
Admon R, Kaiser RH, Dillon DG, Beltzer M, Goer F, Olson DP, Vitaliano G, Pizzagalli DA. Dopaminergic Enhancement of Striatal Response to Reward in Major Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;174(4):378-386. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010111. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
PMID: 27771973BACKGROUNDLiu Y, Admon R, Mellem MS, Belleau EL, Kaiser RH, Clegg R, Beltzer M, Goer F, Vitaliano G, Ahammad P, Pizzagalli DA. Machine Learning Identifies Large-Scale Reward-Related Activity Modulated by Dopaminergic Enhancement in Major Depression. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Feb;5(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
PMID: 31784354DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The choice of a 50-mg dose of amisulpride was based on animal work showing low doses potentiate striatal dopamine release, have strong hedonic effects, and increase the incentive value of environmental cues. Higher doses may have different results.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Diego Pizzagalli, Ph.D.
- Organization
- McLean Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Diego A Pizzagalli, PhD
McLean Hospital, Harvard University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2010
First Posted
December 3, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 27, 2018
Results First Posted
January 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share