Safety Study of GE-145 320 mg I/mL Injection vs. Iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in Elderly Subjects Undergoing Coronary Procedure
A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Safety Study of GE-145 320 mg I/mL Injection Versus Iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in Elderly Subjects Undergoing Coronary Artery Catheterization Procedure
1 other identifier
interventional
284
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate cardio-renal and overall safety profile of GE 145 320 mg I/ml Injection when compared to iopamidol 370 mg I/mL. The study will focus on elderly subjects with either chronic renal insufficiency, or diabetes mellitus (DM) requiring drug therapy, or congestive heart failure (CHF) NYHA Class III or greater, who are referred for a coronary catheterization procedure with or without PCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 2, 2014
CompletedAugust 29, 2018
August 1, 2018
2.1 years
December 1, 2010
February 6, 2014
August 1, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Ioforminol and Iopamidol-enhanced Images as Determined by an Independent Reader.
Overall image quality (excellent, adequate or poor) and diagnostic usefulness (diagnostic or non-diagnostic) were assessed using qualitative scales.
After the imaging date for either Ioforminol or Iopamidol.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
To Determine Incidence Rates of the Overall AEs, Organ-specific AEs (i.e., Delayed Skin Reactions, General Subject Comfort, and Allergic/Immunologic Reactions, Etc.) and SAEs Following Administration
Time zero equals the date of contrast imaging and for up to 7 days for safety monitoring post contrast administration.
Assessing the Incidence of Renal Biomarker-based Contrast-induced Acute Kidney Injury (CI-AKI) in Subjects Post Administration of Ioforminol or Iopamidol Injections
2, 6 and 24 hours post Ioforminol and Iopamidol adminstration
Study Arms (2)
GE 145 320mg I/ml injection
EXPERIMENTALIopamidol 370mg I/ml injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
GE-145-320 mg I/mL as a single iv. administration. Comparator agent Isovue (iopamidol) 370 mg I/mL as a single iv. administration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females 65 years of age with cardiovascular disease who are referred for a coronary catheterization procedure with or without PCI.
- The subject has at least one of the following comorbidities:
- \) Chronic renal insufficiency, (eGFR \<60 but 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to the MDRD equation) as measured within 2 weeks or at the screening visit;
- \) DM diagnosed greater than 6 months prior to study entry and which requires either insulin or anti-hyperglycemic drug therapy;
- \) CHF (NYHA) class III or greater measured within 2 weeks of enrollment or at the screening visit.
You may not qualify if:
- The subject has known allergies to either iodine or any ICM.
- The subject has severe renal insufficiency (eGFR \<15 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to the MDRD equation) or is on dialysis.
- The subject has acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency coronary angiography and/or intervention.
- The subject is not willing or unable to discontinue metformin (e.g., Glucophage) at the time of the study procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GE Healthcarelead
- i3 Statprobecollaborator
- Medpace, Inc.collaborator
- Biomedical Systemscollaborator
- Rules-Based Medicine, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
GE Healthcare
Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ruben Sheng, M.D.
- Organization
- GE Healthcare
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rubin Sheng, M.D.
GE Healthcare
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2010
First Posted
December 3, 2010
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 29, 2018
Results First Posted
May 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2018-08