Study Stopped
Proposed doses were too large, bolus oxytocin may cause cases of arrythmias, and some even advocate slowing down the infusion rates that are currently used.
Does Intramyometrial Oxytocin Improve Outcome in Elective Cesarean Delivery?
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Oxytocin use has become routine practice in elective cesarean delivery to promote uterine contraction and reduce blood loss. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the best dose of oxytocin and the most effective route of administration. Most dosage and delivery systems have been empirically derived. It is currently our practice at the Royal University Hospital to start an oxytocin infusion (20U/L) once the baby has been delivered. Some anesthesiologists use bolus intravenous oxytocin and it is occasionally requested by the obstetrician. A few obstetricians also choose to inject bolus oxytocin directly into the uterus (intramyometrial). The primary objectives of the study include:
- 1.Determine if our standard 'low dose' oxytocin infusion is adequate prophylaxis to prevent need for additional uterotonics, including additional oxytocin;
- 2.Determine if the addition of prophylactic intramyometrial oxytocin improves both the primary outcome (uterine tone) and secondary outcomes (estimated blood loss, preoperative to postoperative change in hematocrit, need for additional uterotonics, and need for blood pressure support); and
- 3.Act as a dose finding study to determine if the intramyometrial dose is sufficient to augment uterine contraction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedJanuary 11, 2012
October 1, 2011
8 months
November 30, 2010
January 9, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Uterine Tone
The blinded obstetrician will assess uterine tone at 1,2,4,6, 8 and 10-minute intervals
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Estimated Blood Loss
Immediately Post-operatively
Pre-operative to post-operative change in hematocrit
24 hrs post-operative
Need for additional unterotonics
Immediately post delivery
Need for blood pressure support
Intra-operative period following administration of oxytocin
Study Arms (2)
Intramyometrial oxytocin
EXPERIMENTALIntramyometrial Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
10 U intramyometrial oxytocin bolus immediately after cesarian delivery, and an infusion of 20 U/L of oxytocin at 500ml/hr.
10U intramyometrial normal saline bolus immediately after cesarian delivery, and an infusion of 20U/L of oxytocin at 500ml/hr.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy Parturients
- Elective cesarean Delivery
- Term (\> 37 wks gestational age) as defined by ultrasound or last menstrual period
- Singleton fetus
- Vertex presentation
- Age \> 18
- BMI \< 40
- Height \> 5'2" and \< 5"8"
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Placenta previa
- Multiple gestation
- Preeclampsia
- Gestational Diabetes or pre-existing diabetes
- Macrosomia (estimated fetal weight prior to delivery)
- Polyhydramnios
- Oligohydramnios
- Uterine fibroids
- More than 2 previous cesarean deliveries
- Suspected adherent placenta (acreta/increta/percreta)
- Planned general anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Monica K San Vicente, MD
University of Saskatchewan, Department of Anesthesia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David C Campbell, MD, FRCPC
University of Saskatchewan, Department of Anesthesia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2010
First Posted
December 2, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 11, 2012
Record last verified: 2011-10