NCT01246882

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of daily feedback about physical activity (number of bouts of walking, duration of bouts, total walking distance, average and fastest walking speed) and walking average speed compared to feedback about walking speed only on walking-related outcomes during inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. For the first time, daily walking and other exercise will be monitored by bilateral triaxial accelerometers on the ankles. Activity-recognition algorithms will analyze the inpatient sensor data and return a summary to the participants at each site.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_3 stroke

Geographic Reach
12 countries

18 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 22, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 23, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2011

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 1, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

November 22, 2010

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Stroke, gait, walking, disabilitywireless inertial sensingmobile health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Gait speed

    Discharge

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Distance walked in 3 minutes

    Discharge

Study Arms (2)

Augmented activity feedback

EXPERIMENTAL

Feedback three times per week about 10-m walking speed, plus amount and types of physical activity measured using wireless bilateral ankle sensors that detect bouts of walking and cycling speed, duration, and distance.

Behavioral: Augmented activity feedback

speed-only feedback

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Feedback three times per week about overground walking speed over 10 meters.

Behavioral: Speed-only feedback

Interventions

Feedback about walking speed and amount of physical activity will be provided 3 times per week from data acquired from wireless sensors on each ankle.

Also known as: accelerometry, hemiparetic stroke, mobile health, wireless health, feedback about performance, physical therapy for stroke rehabilitation, locomotion
Augmented activity feedback

Feedback about walking speed will be provided 3 times per week.

speed-only feedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Admission for acute inpatient rehabilitation of a first stroke (or second stroke after full recovery from prior TIA/Stroke)
  • Time from onset of stroke to admission for rehabilitation \< 35 days
  • Stroke from any cause (thrombotic infarct, cardioembolus, intracerebral hemorrhage) that includes unilateral hemiparesis. Hemiparesis means less than / equal to 4/5 strength by the British Medical Council scale for hip flexion tested supine and for knee or ankle flexion and extension (scores less than / equal to 22 of 25 possible points)
  • Ability to follow simple instructions, especially to understand verbal reinforcement about activity.
  • Independent in mobility prior to admission by the Barthel Index.
  • Able to walk with no more than physical assistance of 2 persons for at least 5 steps (for example, 3 strides of the left leg alternating with 2 on the right leg). Subjects can use any type of assistive device and brace needed.
  • Able to understand and repeat information related to the Informed Consent. The subject signs a Consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Current medical disease that will limit physical therapy at the time of randomization or limited walking prior to the stroke, such as serious infection, DVT, orthostatic hypotension, \> stage 2 decubitus ulcer of buttocks or legs, congestive heart failure, claudication, and pain with weight-bearing or walking. Subjects can be entered if a complication resolves within 7 days of admission screening.
  • Aphasia with inability to follow 2-step directions during therapeutic instructions or answers Yes/No to questions with \< 75% accuracy related to personal health and symptoms.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (18)

Fairlawn Hospital

Worcester, Massachusetts, 01602, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63108, United States

Location

Burke Rehabilitation Hospital

White Plains, New York, 10605, United States

Location

St. Luke's Hospital

Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18104, United States

Location

Ain Shams University

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Father Muller Medical College

Karnataka, India

Location

National Rehabilitation Hospital

Dublin, Ireland

Location

San Raffaele Hospital

Milan, Italy

Location

Sam Camillo

Venice, Italy

Location

Morinomiya Hospital

Osaka, Japan

Location

Burwood Hospital

Christchurch, New Zealand

Location

Univeristy College Hospital

Ibadan, Nigeria

Location

Chonnam National Hospital

Gwangju, South Korea

Location

Rehabilitation Hospital

Barcelona, Spain

Location

University of Vigo

Vigo, Spain

Location

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Gazi University

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Dobkin BH, Dorsch A. The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(9):788-98. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425908.

    PMID: 21989632BACKGROUND
  • Dorsch AK, Thomas S, Xu X, Kaiser W, Dobkin BH; SIRRACT investigators. SIRRACT: An International Randomized Clinical Trial of Activity Feedback During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Enabled by Wireless Sensing. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Jun;29(5):407-15. doi: 10.1177/1545968314550369. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

AccelerometryTelemedicinePhysical Therapy ModalitiesStroke RehabilitationLocomotion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative TechniquesDelivery of Health CarePatient Care ManagementHealth Services AdministrationTherapeuticsRehabilitationNeurological RehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesMovementPhysiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Bruce H Dobkin, MD

    University of California, Los Angeles

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2010

First Posted

November 23, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion

November 1, 2012

Study Completion

November 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 1, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Locations