Study Stopped
Inadequate recruitment resulting in a too low patient number for collection of long term efficacy data.
A Degarelix Trial in Patients With Prostate Cancer
An Open-label, Multi-Centre, Extension Trial, Evaluating the Long-Term Progression-Free Survival of Degarelix or Goserelin Three-Month Dosing Regimens in Patients With Prostate Cancer Requiring Androgen Deprivation Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
288
13 countries
63
Brief Summary
A phase III extension trial comparing the efficacy and safety of degarelix 3 month depot with the established therapy Zoladex 3 month implant in patients with prostate cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 prostate-cancer
Started Oct 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 prostate-cancer
63 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 3, 2015
CompletedJune 3, 2015
May 1, 2015
1.2 years
November 16, 2010
February 26, 2015
May 13, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hazard Ratio of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression-free Survival (PFS) Failure Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
PSA PFS failure is defined as either PSA failure (defined as increase in serum PSA of 50%, and at least 5 ng/mL, compared to nadir, measured on two consecutive occasions at least 2 weeks apart) or death, whichever is first. The number below present the unadjusted rates (estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) of no PSA-PFS.
From baseline to 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Hazard Ratio of PFS Failure Rates During 3 Years Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
From baseline to 3 years
Hazard Ratio of PSA Failure Rates During 3 Years Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
From baseline to 3 years
Hazard Ratio of Testosterone Escape Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
From baseline to 3 years
Hazard Ratio of the Rates of Introduction of Additional Therapy Related to Prostate Cancer During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
From baseline to 3 years
Hazard Ratio of Mortality Rates During 3 Years' Treatment Between Degarelix and Goserelin
From baseline to 3 years
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Degarelix 240 mg/480 mg
EXPERIMENTALGoserelin acetate
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The degarelix doses were administered by subcutaneous (s.c.) injections into the abdominal wall. In the main CS35 trial, a starting dose of 240 mg degarelix was administered on Day 0. One month later a maintenance dose of 480 mg was administered. This was repeated after 4, 7, and 10 months (ie a total of 5 administrations in the main trial). In the CS35A extension trial, the participants received the same treatment as in the main trial ie the degarelix treated participants continued to receive degarelix 480 mg s.c. treatment every three months.
The goserelin doses were administered by subcutaneous (s.c.) implants into the abdominal wall. In the main CS35 trial, an initial dose of 3.6 mg goserelin was administered on Day 0. One month later a subsequent dose of 10.8 mg was administered and this was repeated after 4, 7, and 10 months (ie a total of 5 implants in the main trial). In the CS35A extension trial, the participants received the same treatment as in the main trial ie the goserelin treated participants continued to receive goserelin acetate 10.8 mg s.c. implants every three months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has given written consent prior to any trial-related activity is performed. (A trial-related activity is defined as any procedure that would not have been performed during the normal management of the patient).
- Has completed the CS35 trial.
You may not qualify if:
- Has been withdrawn from the CS35 trial.
- Has had end of trial visit in CS35 prior to approval of the CS35A protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (63)
University of Colorado School of Medicine
Aurora, Colorado, United States
The Urology Center of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, United States
Urology Associates of Dover, PA
Dover, Delaware, United States
South Florida Medical Research
Aventura, Florida, United States
Urology Group of New Mexico, PC
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Carolina Urologic Research Center
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States
Urology San Antonio Research, Pa
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Seattle Urology Research Center
Burien, Washington, United States
AZ Groeninge - Campus Sint-Maarten
Kortrijk, Belgium
Jonathan Giddens Medicine Professional Corporation
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Southern Interior Medical Research Inc.
Kelowna, Canada
Mor Urology, Inc.
Newmarket, Canada
Investigational site
Scarborough, Canada
Investigational site
Toronto, Canada
Urocentrum Brno
Brno, Czechia
Nemocnice Jindrichuv Hradec, a.s.
Jindřichův Hradec, Czechia
Kromerizska nemocnice a.s.
Kroměříž, Czechia
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole, Praha 5
Prague, Czechia
Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze, Praha 2
Prague, Czechia
Krajska nemocnice T. Bati a.s.
Zlín, Czechia
ODL Terveys Oy
Oulu, Finland
Pohjois-Karjalan keskussairaala
Tampere, Finland
Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala
Tampere, Finland
Gemeinschaftspraxis Rudolph & Wörner
Kirchheim, Germany
Urologische Studienpraxis
Nürtingen, Germany
Fövárosi Önkormányzat Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Kórház
Budapest, Hungary
Fövárosi Önkormányzat uzsoki utcai Kórház
Budapest, Hungary
Semmelweis Egyetem
Budapest, Hungary
Dombóvári Szent Lukács Egészségügyi Nonprofit Kft.
Dombóvár, Hungary
Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén Megyei Kórház és Egyetemi Oktató Kórház
Miskolc, Hungary
Miskolci Semmelweis Ignác Egészségügyi Központ és Egyetemi Oktató Kórház Nonprofit Kft
Miskolc, Hungary
Pécsi Tudományegyetem
Pécs, Hungary
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ
Szeged, Hungary
Jávorszky Ödön Kórház
Vác, Hungary
Hospital Christus Muguerza del Parque
Chihuahua, Chih., Mexico
Hospital Angeles Culiacan
Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico
Consultorio de Especialidad en Urologia Privado
Durango, Mexico
Médica Sur, S.A.B. de C.V.
Mexico City, Mexico
Hospital Angeles Lindavista
Mexico City, DF, Mexico
Consultorio Medico
Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Catharina-ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
MC Haaglanden
The Hague, Netherlands
SPZOZ Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony im. J.Sniadeckiego
Bialystok, Poland
Centrum Medyczne Medur Sp. z o.o.
Bielsko-Biala, Poland
Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Janusza Korczaka w Slupsku
Słupsk, Poland
Private Medical Center SRL
Arad, Romania
Brasov Emergency Clinical County Hospital
Brasov, Romania
"Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele" Clinical Hospital
Bucharest, Romania
"Sfantul Ioan" Emergency Clinical Hospital
Bucharest, Romania
Dinu Uromedica
Bucharest, Romania
Fundeni Clinical Institute of Uronephrology and Renal Transplantation
Bucharest, Romania
PROVITA 2000 Medical Center
Constanța, Romania
"Dr. C.I. Parhon" Clinical Hospital
Iași, Romania
Vita Care Flav Medical Center
Piteşti, Romania
Sibiu Emergency Clinical County Hospital
Sibiu, Romania
Dnipropetrovsk State Medical Academy
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
Donetsk Regional Clinical Territorial Medical Association
Donetsk, Ukraine
Regional Clinical Center of Urology and Nephrology n.a. V.I.Shapoval
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #3
Kyiv, Ukraine
Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital
Odesa, Ukraine
Municipal Institution "Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital"
Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine
Ipswich Hospital
Ipswich, United Kingdom
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Sutton, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Development Support
- Organization
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Development Support
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2010
First Posted
November 17, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 3, 2015
Results First Posted
June 3, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05