Comparison of Endothelial Dysfunction (BMS vs SES) in the Same Patient With Multiple Coronary Artery Lesions
CREDENTIAL
Head-to-Head Comparison of Endothelial Dysfunction (Bare Metal Stent vs Sirolimus Eluting Stent) in the Same Patient With Multiple Coronary Artery Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomised study to compare the endothelial dysfunction of BMS vs SES, both implanted in the same patient with multiple de novo coronary artery lesions undergoing elective PCI. The primary end point will be the evaluation of endothelial dysfunction at 6 months follow-up by measuring the change in vessel diameter in 5 points of the stent and peri-stent site after infusion of acetylcholine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Mar 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2010
CompletedNovember 17, 2010
April 1, 2009
8 months
November 16, 2010
November 16, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
evaluation of endothelial dysfunction at 6 months follow-up by measuring the change in vessel diameter in 5 points of the stent and peri-stent site after infusion of acetylcholine
evaluation of change in vessel diameters (vasoconstriction or vasodilatation) in proximal and distal stent territories, after intracoronary acetylcholine infusion, having as reference the baseline diameters, for the BMS artery vs the SES artery
6 months
Study Arms (2)
BMS arm
PLACEBO COMPARATORbare metal stent arm
SES arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORsirolimus eluting stent arm
Interventions
Acetylcholine will be infused at a concentration of 140 microg/minute, over a period of 2 minutes, yielding estimated intracoronary concentrations of 10(-5)mol/L, with the assumption of a flow rate of 80mL/min). All infusions will be delivered at a constant rate using an infusion pump. Subsequently, in order to evaluate the endothelium-independent vasomotor response, 2mg of isosorbide dinitrate or bolus 250microg of nitroglycerine will be infused by intracoronary bolus in all subjects. The response to nitrate will be recorded 1 minute after the bolus. A 3-min period will be allowed to elapse between each drug infusion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- stable angina pectoris
- at least two significant angiographic stenoses in different native coronary vessels or in the same vessel but two different ramifications with similar diameter
- non-surgical patients
You may not qualify if:
- acute coronary syndromes
- myocardial infarction within 3 months from event
- clinical or angiographic coronary vasospasm
- coronary angiographic findings of a fresh thrombus in the initial angiography (filling defect proximal to or involving the stenosis)
- coronary anatomy unsuitable for for intracoronary acetylcholine testing (left main coronary artery disease \>30%, surgical three vessel disease or other anatomical considerations that make it unsafe to perform intracoronary studies)
- progression of lesions or development of de novo lesions in nontarget lesions or vessels on follow-up angiography
- patients with a vessel diameter \< 2,50 mm and length lesions \<10 and \>30 mm.
- patients with vessel diameter difference (SES vs BMS) \>0,5mm and length difference of the stenosis \>50%
- lesions treated with balloon injury \<10 mm or \>50 mm in length
- severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction
- bifurcation/ostial
- presence of an unhealed dissection identified by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) performed at the end of the study.
- angiographic restenosis in follow-up angiography
- patients with severe risk factors for endothelial dysfunction: severe renal failure, life expectancy less than 1 year, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>180mmHg), currently smoking, uncontrolled hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol \>240mg/dl)
- any contraindication/nontolerance to the use of aspirin, heparin and/or clopidogrel
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Roma, Roma, 00151, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Mischie AN, Nazzaro MS, Fiorilli R, De Felice F, Musto C, Confessore P, Parma A, Boschetti C, Violini R. Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare metal stent evaluation of the coronary endothelial dysfunction in the same patient presenting with multiple coronary artery lesions: the CREDENTIAL study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):E184-91. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24844. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
PMID: 23359371DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Violini Roberto, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mischie Nicolae Alexandru, MD
European Society of Cardiology
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nazzaro Marco, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2010
First Posted
November 17, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 17, 2010
Record last verified: 2009-04