Self-expandable Esophageal Stent Versus Balloon Tamponade in Refractory Esophageal Variceal Bleeding.
Esophageal Stent is More Effective Than Tamponade Controlling Refractory Esophageal Variceal Bleeding: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the last years, important advances have been done in the treatment and prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding. Experts agree that the combination of pharmacological and endoscopic therapy should be the first line therapy in the acute bleeding episode; whereas TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) is considered a rescue therapy. Nevertheless, some patients would require different therapies to act as a "bridge" until definitive therapy can be instituted. Balloon tamponade (using the Sengstaken tube) represents, up to now, the most widely used temporary "bridge" to TIPS. However, balloon tamponade is associated with a high incidence of serious adverse events. Recently, the use of self-expanding metal stents have been introduced in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding showing a very high hemostatic efficacy with no adverse events. The present study is directed to compare the efficacy free of adverse events and mortality of self-expanding metal stents vs balloon tamponade in patients with variceal bleeding refractory to medical and endoscopic therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedFebruary 5, 2015
February 1, 2015
4.4 years
August 4, 2010
February 4, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Combined: bleeding + absence of severe adverse events + survival
The primary endpoint combines absence of bleeding + absence of severe adverse events probably related to the study devices + survival during the first 15 days after inclusion in the study or at hospital discharge. Patients to compare are those with liver cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding (AVB) not controlled with combined pharmacological and endoscopic therapy (see definitions). Those patients will be randomized to receive a self-expandable esophageal stent (SX-Ella-Danis) or balloon tamponade with a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube.
15 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Bleeding
6 months
Survival
6 months
Transfusional requirements
15 days
Adverse events
15 days
Analgesia and sedation requirements
15 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Self-expandable esophageal stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient will receive a self-expandable esophageal stent (SX-Ella-Danis) without endoscopical guidance but under slight sedation. An immediate X-ray will be done to assess the correct placement of the stent. After a maximum of 7 days, the stent will be removed by using the specifically designed devices.
Sengstaken-Blakemore tube
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe esophageal tamponade will be done as described elsewhere. The gastric content will be checked hourly and the correct placement of the tube will be checked by an immediate X-ray. The esophageal balloon will be inflated a maximum of 24 hours.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The study will include all patients with cirrhosis admitted to the hospital because an acute esophageal variceal bleeding defined according to Baveno II criteria (5) and who will achieve the following criteria:
- Failure to control bleeding despite pharmacological (somatostatin 3 or 6 mg/12h iv or terlipressin, 2mg/4h iv) AND endoscopic therapy (esophageal banding ligation preferably or sclerotherapy). Failure to control bleeding was defined, according to Baveno IV criteria (6), as evidence of continuous digestive bleeding and any of the following:
- Hematemesis (or naso-gastric aspirate \> 100 ml of fresh blood) \> 2h after the start of combined pharmacological and endoscopic therapy.
- Decrease in hemoglobin values \> 3g vs previous values (without blood transfusion).
- Massive bleeding. Acute variceal bleeding uncontrolled despite pharmacological therapy started at any moment, with no need of previous endoscopic therapy. Uncontrolled bleeding is defined as an upper digestive bleeding in which no hemodynamic stability (systolic arterial pressure \> 70 mmHg and heart rate \< 100 bpm) could be achieved.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years.
- Esophageal rupture.
- Esophageal, gastric or upper respiratory tract tumor.
- Esophageal stenosis.
- Recent esophageal surgery.
- Previous esophageal tamponade to treat the index bleed.
- Big hiatal hernia precluding the correct placement of the esophageal devices.
- Known hepatocellular carcinoma surpassing Milan criteria.
- Terminal disease.
- No written consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelonalead
- Germans Trias i Pujol Hospitalcollaborator
- Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajalcollaborator
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospitalcollaborator
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañoncollaborator
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturiascollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Clinic
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Escorsell A, Pavel O, Cardenas A, Morillas R, Llop E, Villanueva C, Garcia-Pagan JC, Bosch J; Variceal Bleeding Study Group. Esophageal balloon tamponade versus esophageal stent in controlling acute refractory variceal bleeding: A multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology. 2016 Jun;63(6):1957-67. doi: 10.1002/hep.28360. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
PMID: 26600191DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angels Escorsell, MD
Liver Unit. Hospital Clínic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant. Liver Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2010
First Posted
November 17, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 5, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02