Respiratory Therapy and Newborn Pain: Comparison Between Techniques
Study of Respiratory Therapy and Newborn Pain That Made a Comparison Between Physiotherapeutical Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study intend to assess the pain intensity of newborns in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) undergoing different techniques of respiratory therapy and compare these procedures. A randomized controlled clinical trial and blind trial with newborns admitted to NICU. The babies were categorized according to gestational age , age, weight, diagnosis, support and signs of respiratory distress. Then, they were allocated by lot to come from one of 3 groups: G1 - control, G2 - undergoing physical therapy; G3 - received the thoracoabdominal rebalancing. Each newborn received just one physical therapy session in that they were assessed before one of the three procedures (T1), immediately after (T2) and after 15 minutes (T3). This evaluation found cardiorespiratory parameters (oxygen saturation, heart and respiratory rate) and three specific scales for pain assessment (NIPS, NFCS and PIPP). The hypothesis is that newborns hospitalized in intensive care unit did not show pain when undergoing respiratory therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedJune 19, 2013
October 1, 2010
1.4 years
November 12, 2010
June 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in cardiorespiratory parameters
Immediately after intervention and 15 minutes after the end of the intervention
Pain Scales (NIPS, PIPP, NFCS)
Immediately after intervention and 15 minutes after the end of the intervention
Study Arms (3)
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONIn this group the newborns remained at rest 20 minutes and receive no intervention of respiratory therapy.
Physical Therapy
EXPERIMENTALIn this group the newborns are submitted to the mechanical vibrator.
Thoracoabdominal rebalancing
EXPERIMENTALIn this group the newborns receive the thoracoabdominal rebalancing.
Interventions
In this group the infants received four handlings thoracoabdominal rebalancing, in order: 1) 5min support thoracoabdominal, in which the therapist leaned one hand on the lower chest and upper abdomen of the newborn, with some of its fingers on the ribs, pulling them gently down and keeping them in that position during inspiration, 2) more than 5 minutes of abdominal support, carried by hand in the lower abdomen of the newborn, applying light pressure during inspiration enough to be beaten by the diaphragm of the newborn and not to increase the use of accessory muscles of inspiration, 3) 5min support ileo-costal, by a slight manual pressure of the physiotherapist on the lateral chest and abdomen of the newborn, maintained throughout inspiration and 4) finally ran up 5min ginga thoracic maneuver slight manual pressure on the lower chest of newborns, directing the costal movement during expiration, now an then the other hemithorax.
In this group the newborns were first submitted to the mechanical vibrator applied over a diaper, on the chest of newborns for 5 min, as follows: 1min 1min right hemithorax and the left hemithorax, both previously, followed 30 seconds in the lateral aspect of each hemithorax; more than 1min in each hemithorax in the posterior region. The mechanical vibrator was performed subsequent to manual chest compression, using light hand pressure on the chest of newborns, respecting the compliance of the chest. The chest compression was applied for 2min 2min in the right hemithorax and left-sided chest, above, and 1 minute on each side, another 2 minutes on the back of each hemithorax, totaling 10 minutes of compression. Next to chest compression, mechanical vibration was applied for 5 min in the same topographical sequence described.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Newborns up to 28 days with any weight and gestational age in ventilatory support or oxygen therapy and clinical indication for Physical Therapy.
You may not qualify if:
- Newborns with contraindication of respiratory therapy, those that had problems during any of the study procedures and changes in those suffering from respiratory support or oxygen therapy during data collection.
- If there was failure to collect any of the parameters for evaluating the newborn also was no longer part of the sample.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maternidade Carmela Dutra Hospital
Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88015-270, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2010
First Posted
November 15, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2010-10