Efficacy and Safety Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A to Treat Glabellar Lines
Double-blind, Randomized, Active Drug Comparative, Parallel Designed, Multi-center,Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of "Meditoxin® Versus Botox® in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines
1 other identifier
interventional
314
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the efficacy and safety of Meditoxin® are not inferior to Botox®'s in the treatment of glabellar lines.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 23, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2010
CompletedMarch 28, 2019
March 1, 2019
9 months
November 4, 2010
March 26, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Glabellar line improvement rate at maximum frown confirmed with investigator's live assessment severity
Glabellar line improvement rate at maximum frown confirmed with investigator's live assessment of glabellar line severity at baseline and 4 weeks after the injection
0 and 4 weeks after the injection
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Glabellar line improvement rate at maximum frown confirmed with investigator's live assessment
0, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after the injection
Glabellar line improvement rate at rest confirmed with investigator's live assessment of glabellar line severity
0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after the injection
Glabellar line improvement rate at maximum frown confirmed with investigator's photo assessment
0, 4, 8,12 and 16 weeks after the injection
Glabellar line improvement rate at rest confirmed with investigator's photo assessment of glabellar line severity
0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after the injection
Glabellar line improvement rate confirmed with subject's assessment
4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after the injection
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Botulinum toxin type A(Meditoxin®)
EXPERIMENTALBotulinum toxin type A(Botox®)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
single administration, Day 0, 20U
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women aged between 20 and 65
- Patients attaining ≥grade 2 (moderate) in the investigator's rating of the severity of glabella lines at maximum frown
- Patients who can comply with the study procedures and visit schedule
- Patients who voluntarily sign the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with medical conditions who may be at greater risk due to the administration of the investigational drugs (e.g.. diseases that may affect the neuromuscular action including Myasthenia Gravis, Lambert-Eaton Syndrome, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and motor neuropathy)
- Patients with severe internal diseases (cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine diseases etc.)
- Patients who have bleeding tendency or taking anti-coagulant
- Patients who were injected with botulinum toxin within the past 3 months
- Patients with allergy or hypersensitivity to the investigational drugs or their components
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating. Female subjects of childbearing age who have a plan to get pregnant during the study period, or do not use available contraceptive methods (Women of childbearing age should have negative urine pregnancy test results at baseline visit (0 week) prior to the first injection.)
- Patients with the history of facial nerve paralysis or the symptoms of eyelid ptosis
- Patients with skin disorders or infection at the injection site
- Patients who have received other procedures which may affect glabellar and forehead lines within 6 months
- Patients with the history of treatment of glabellar part(including forehead) like face lifting and permanent implant or with scars which may affect the treatment results
- Patients whose glabellar lines cannot be satisfactorily improved with physical method since the lines are not flattened even using hands
- Patients who have a plan to receive facial cosmetic procedures including dermal filler, photorejuvenation, chemical peeling and dermabrasion during the study period
- Patients who are participating in other clinical trials or have participated in other clinical trials 30 days before screening or the five times the half life of a drug which was given to patient during the previous clinical trials
- Patients who are unable to communicate or follow the instructions
- Patients who are not eligible for this study based on the judgment of an investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medy-Toxlead
Study Sites (6)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, Gyoung-gi Do, 463-707, South Korea
Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 110-746, South Korea
Sevrance Medical Center
Seoul, 120-749, South Korea
St. Paul Hospital
Seoul, 130-709, South Korea
Seoul Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
Chung-Ang University Yong-San Hospital
Seoul, 140-013, South Korea
Related Publications (4)
Carruthers JD, Lowe NJ, Menter MA, Gibson J, Eadie N; Botox Glabellar Lines II Study Group. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for patients with glabellar lines. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Sep 15;112(4):1089-98. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000076504.79727.62.
PMID: 12973229RESULTKriegl L, Horst D, Kirchner T, Jung A. LEF-1 expression in basal cell carcinomas. Br J Dermatol. 2009 Jun;160(6):1353-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09144.x. Epub 2009 Mar 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 19416246RESULTWalter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101-10. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:13.0.co;2-e.
PMID: 9463853RESULTLandis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74. No abstract available.
PMID: 884196RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chang-Hun Huh, MD, Ph.D.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hoon Kang, MD, Ph.D.
St. Paul Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Won-Seok Kim, MD, Ph.D.
Kang-Buk Samsung Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jong-Hyun Won, MD, Ph.D.
Seoul Asan Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joo-Hee Lee, MD, Ph.D.
Sevrance Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Beom-Joon Kim, MD, Ph.D.
Chung-Ang University Yong-San Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2010
First Posted
November 10, 2010
Study Start
November 23, 2009
Primary Completion
August 30, 2010
Study Completion
September 30, 2010
Last Updated
March 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03