Comparison of Redermic, Rejuva-A and Combination of Both Redermic and Rejuva-A in Subjects With Signs of Aging
Single Blind Study to Evaluate the Tolerance and Effectiveness of Redermic Versus Rejuva-A™ (0.025% Tretinoin) and Redermic in Combination With Rejuva-A™ (0.025% Tretinoin) Under Normal Conditions in Subjects With Signs of Aging
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Facial skin aging is a complex process combining factors such as sun exposure, smoking and those that are believed to be inherited. Changes in the skin over time including decreased thickness result in skin atrophy, wrinkling, sagging, yellowness and changes in pigmentation. Redermic is a cosmetic cream that has been evaluated clinically but not in comparison to tretinoin nor in combination with tretinoin. There is no data on the safety and efficacy of Redermic as compared to topical tretinoin. Rejuva is a cream currently approved by Health Canada for the treatment of photodamaged skin. It contains 0.025% tretinoin one of the most widely studied topical product for skin aging. Studies have shown that topical tretinoin increases collagen synthesis and epidermal thickness thereby improving the appearance of skin aging. The efficacy of Rejuva combined with another topical cosmetic cream such as Redermic in the treatment of skin aging is unknown. One hundred and twenty (120) subjects with signs of skin aging participated in this single-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of Redermic versus Rejuva-A™ (0.025% tretinoin) and Redermic in combination with Rejuva-A™ (0.025% tretinoin).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 15, 2010
CompletedSeptember 20, 2011
September 1, 2011
10 months
July 24, 2009
November 16, 2010
September 18, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Skin Aging Measured With the Photonumeric Scale.
Scoring was accomplished by matching each part of the face (forehead, glabella, corners of the mouth, nasal labial fold, crow's feet, below eyes and upper lip) to photographs in the scales and reporting the appropriate number in the tables. All individual scores were added to obtain the total score (Less signs of skin aging = 0, more signs of skin aging = 41.6).
12, 24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Photographic Evaluation by a Panel of Blinded Dermatologists.
24 weeks
Trans-epidermal Water Loss (TEWL).
12, 24 weeks
Skin Hydration (Conductance)
12, 24 weeks
Skin Elasticity.
12, 24 weeks
Area Ratio - Analysis of Skin Replicas of Crow's Feet.
24 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Redermic
EXPERIMENTALCream was applied twice a day every day, morning and evening for 24 weeks.
Rejuva-A
ACTIVE COMPARATORWeek 1, Rejuva-A cream was applied to face in the evening twice a week. Weeks 2 \& 3, Rejuva-A cream was applied to the face in the evening three times a week. Weeks 4-24, Rejuva-A cream was applied to the face in the evening every other day. In cases of intolerance, returned to the previous dosage and remained there until the end of study. Hydrating cream was applied to the face in the morning every day for 24 weeks.
Combination of Redermic and Rejuva-A
ACTIVE COMPARATORWeek 1, Rejuva-A cream was applied to face in the evening twice a week. Weeks 2 \& 3, Rejuva-A cream was applied to the face in the evening three times a week. Weeks 4-24, Rejuva-A cream was applied to the face in the evening every other day. In cases of intolerance, returned to the previous dosage and remained there until the end of study. Redermic was applied every evening when Rejuva-A™ was not applied, as well as every morning.
Interventions
Cosmetic cream formulation 609637 43.
Tretinoin 0.025% cream.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects are female, between 45 and 55 years of age.
- Females of childbearing potential have had a negative urine pregnancy test prior to randomization.
- Subjects are willing to use adequate contraceptive method or are surgically sterile (including tubal ligation), post-menopausal, abstinent or with a same-sex partner. Adequate means of contraception include; intra-uterine device (IUD) in use for 30 days before Day 0, barrier methods and spermicide in use at least 14 days before Day 0 or oral contraceptive in use for at least 30 days before Day 0.
- Subjects are willing to avoid prolonged exposure to UV radiation for the duration of the study.
- Subjects are capable of giving written informed consent.
- Subjects have changes associated with facial skin aging/photodamaged skin.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects are male.
- Subjects are pregnant or lactating.
- Subjects have a known allergy to Redermic, Rejuva-A™ or to any component of the tested products.
- Subjects have made use of tretinoin, adapalene, tazarotene or other topical medications for the treatment of facial skin aging during the 12 weeks preceding Day 0.
- Subjects have applied topical alpha hydroxyl acids within 28 days of Day 0.
- Subjects have used or plan to use systemic corticosteroids within 28 days of Day 0 or during the study.
- Subjects have made use of a non-medication topical product directed at improving skin aging during the 28 days preceding Day 0.
- Subjects have a hypersensitivity to any retinoids.
- Subjects have a history of alcohol or drug abuse in the past year.
- Subjects are participating in another interventional study.
- Subjects have had a previous intense pulsed light treatment to the face.
- Subjects have had a previous laser treatment to the face directed at improving skin aging.
- Subjects have the presence of skin diseases such as psoriasis or dermatitis on the face that could interfere with study evaluations.
- Planned or unavoidable exposure to intense ultraviolet (UV) radiation during the study (such as sun tanning salons, vacations in a sunny climate or outdoor worker).
- Subjects have had a botulinum toxin A injection treatment on the face within 2 years of Day 0 or plan to receive this treatment during the study.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cosmetique Active Internationallead
- Innovaderm Research Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Innovaderm Research Inc
Montreal, Quebec, H2K 4L5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Annie Levesque
- Organization
- Innovaderm Research Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Bissonnette, MD, FRCPC
Innovaderm Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- President and Dermatologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2009
First Posted
September 10, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
September 20, 2011
Results First Posted
December 15, 2010
Record last verified: 2011-09