Study Stopped
Unable to recruit sufficient number of patients.
Vitamin D Supplementation for Treatment of Heart Failure
DELIGHTFUL
D suppLementation In HearT FaiLure (DELIGHTFUL)
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The central objective of this proposal is to establish that vitamin D supplementation in heart failure patients with low vitamin D levels will have improved outcomes compared to placebo. In addition the investigators will also evaluate the role of genetics in regard to vitamin D and heart failure. The investigators will be evaluating what is currently a novel approach of identifying patients with low vitamin D and treating this low vitamin D level. The investigators will be able to evaluate the importance of vitamin D supplementation in these patients and the role of genetics on our defined outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 heart-failure
Started Oct 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4 heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 18, 2016
CompletedNovember 18, 2016
September 1, 2016
4.2 years
October 27, 2010
September 28, 2016
September 28, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Biomarkers
Biomarkers - C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), propeptide procollagen type I, plasma procollagen III, matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), MMP-9 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1).
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Exercise Capacity Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test
6 months
Quality of Life Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
6 months
Vitamin D Genomics
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Vitamin D
ACTIVE COMPARATORVitamin D supplementation will be an oral load of 100,000 IU then 2000 IU by mouth daily of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol)for 6 months
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORA placebo loading dose will be given followed by two placebo tablets daily for 6 months.
Interventions
Vitamin D supplementation will be an oral load of 100,000 IU then 2000 IU by mouth daily of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol)for 6 months
A placebo loading dose will be given followed by 2 placebo tablets daily for 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HF patients with LV systolic dysfunction of ischemic or non-ischemic origin and an LVEF \<40% using nuclear ventriculography or echocardiography within the last 6 months.
- Attempts should have been made at optimizing medical therapy and the participant should be stable on these medications for at least 3 months.
- Patients with a 25(OH)D level between 10-25 ng/ml
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give informed consent
- Patients with sarcoidosis or other granulomatous disease that can alter vitamin D metabolism
- Patients with primary valvular HF, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and drug-induced HF
- Renal dysfunction defined as serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dl
- Pregnant women
- Patients \<18 years of age
- Patients on vitamin D supplementation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Only a fraction of the original goal of enrollment was met. Therefore, analysis of comparative results was not done. No conclusions of any kind can be made from analyzing the data with the number of patients completing the trial (6 vs 4 patients).
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Barry Bleske
- Organization
- University of Michigan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barry E. Bleske, Pharm. D.
University of Michigan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2010
First Posted
October 29, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 18, 2016
Results First Posted
November 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09