NCT01227785

Brief Summary

This study has 2 purposes: The first purpose of the study is to test a new family of Boston Scientific Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ("ICDs") and cardiac resynchronization therapy ICDs ("CRT-Ds") and show how well these new devices work in patients. This new family is called the INCEPTA ICD and the INCEPTA CRT-D. The second purpose of the study is to collect data from a feature that monitors breathing. It is called the Respiratory Rate Trend (RRT). These data will help to better understand how changes in breathing relate to changes in clinical conditions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2010

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2010

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 8, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2014

Status Verified

April 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

October 22, 2010

Results QC Date

December 11, 2013

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (36)

  • Clinical Performance for Left Ventricular (LV) Sensing Amplitude at Implant for CRT-D Patients

    Left Ventricular (LV) Sensed Amplitude results were reported at implant for CRT-D patients.

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for LV Sensing Amplitude for CRT-D Patients

    Left Ventricular (LV) Sensed Amplitude results were reported pre-discharge for CRT-D patients.

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at1-month for Left Ventricular (LV) Sensing Amplitude for CRT-D Patients

    LV Sensed Amplitude results were reported at 1-month post-implant for CRT-D patients.

    1-month

  • Clinical Performance at Implant for Right Atrium (RA) Sensing Amplitude

    RA Sensed Amplitude results were reported for implant for CRT-D and ICD patients

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RA Sensing Amplitude

    RA Sensed Amplitude results were reported at pre-discharge for CRT-D and ICD patients

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at1-month for RA Sensing Amplitude

    RA Sensed Amplitude results were reported at 1-month post-implant for CRT-D and ICD patients

    1-month

  • Clinical Performance at Implant for Right Ventricle (RV) Sensing Amplitude

    RV Sensed Amplitude results were reported at implant for CRT-D and ICD patients

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for Right Ventricle (RV) Sensing Amplitude

    RV Sensed Amplitude results were reported at pre-discharge for CRT-D and ICD patients

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at1-month for Right Ventricle (RV) Sensing Amplitude

    RV Sensed Amplitude results were reported at 1-month post-implant for CRT-D and ICD patients

    1month

  • Clinical Performance at Implant for LV Pacing Threshold

    LV pacing threshold results were reported for CRT-D patients at implant.

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for LV Pacing Threshold

    LV pacing threshold results were reported at pre-discharge for CRT-D patients.

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at1-month for LV Pacing Threshold

    LV pacing threshold results were reported at 1-month post-implant for CRT-D patients.

    1-month

  • Clinical Performance at Implant for RV Pacing Threshold

    RV pacing threshold results were reported at implant

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RV Pacing Threshold

    RV pacing threshold results were reported at pre-discharge

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at 1-month for RV Pacing Threshold

    RV pacing threshold results were reported at 1-month post-implant

    1-month

  • Clinical Performance at Implant for RA Pacing Threshold

    RA pacing threshold results were reported for implant

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RA Pacing Threshold

    RA pacing threshold results were reported at pre-discharge

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at 1-month for RA Pacing Threshold

    RA pacing threshold results were reported at 1-month post-implant

    1-month

  • Clinical Performance at Implant LV Pacing Impedance for CRT-D.

    LV pacing impedance results at implant were measured in CRT-D.

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for LV Pacing Impedance for CRT-D.

    LV pacing impedance results were reported for pre-discharge visit

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at 1-month for LV Pacing Impedance for CRT-D.

    LV pacing impedance results were reported at 1-month post-implant

    1-month

  • Clinical Performance at Implant for RV Pacing Impedance

    RV pacing impedance results were reported at implant

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RV Pacing Impedance

    RV pacing impedance results were reported for pre-discharge

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at 1-month for RV Pacing Impedance

    RV pacing impedance results were reported at 1-month post-implant

    1-month

  • Clinical Performance at Implant for RA Pacing Impedance

    RA pacing impedance results were reported at implant

    implant

  • Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RA Pacing Impedance

    RA pacing impedance results were reported at pre-discharge

    pre-discharge

  • Clinical Performance at 1-month for RA Pacing Impedance

    RA pacing impedance results were reported at 1-month post-implant

    1-month

  • Product Experiences Reported by the Site for All Patients for Study Duration

    Product experiences reported may include the shock impedance noise display, problems encountered with the universal serial bus (USB), a program parameter mismatch, reverse mode switches, electrogram (EGM) noise without oversensing, lead connection issues, or customer device feedback.

    Overall study results

  • Induced Ventricular Tachycardia / Ventricular Fibrillation (VT/VF) Episode Successful Conversion Rates at Implant

    The % of successful conversions after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. All episodes of induced VT/VF that resolved with successful conversion were counted from the total attempted conversions and reported as the % of successful conversions from those attempted.

    implant

  • Induced VT/VF Episode Successful Conversion Rates at 1-month

    The % of successful conversions after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. All episodes of induced VT/VF that resolved with successful conversion were counted from the total attempted conversions and reported as the % of successful conversions from those attempted.

    1-month

  • Induced VT/VF Episode Successful Conversion Rates at 3-months

    The % of successful conversions after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. All episodes of induced VT/VF that resolved with successful conversion were counted from the total attempted conversions and reported as the % of successful conversions from those attempted.

    3-month

  • Induced Episode Detection Times at Implant

    The mean time it took to complete a successful conversion after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. The time was recorded (in seconds) for the time duration that was required to successfully convert the patient after inducing VT/VF.

    implant

  • Induced Episode Detection Times at 1-month

    The mean time it took to complete a successful conversion after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. The time was recorded (in seconds) for the time duration that was required to successfully convert the patient after inducing VT/VF.

    1-month

  • Induced Episode Detection Times at 3 Months

    The mean time it took to complete a successful conversion after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. The time was recorded (in seconds) for the time duration that was required to successfully convert the patient after inducing VT/VF.

    3-month

  • Spontaneous Episode Conversion Success Rate at 3 Months

    Of the total patients that experienced a spontaneous episode, the % of patients with a spontaneous rhythm conversion that was successful was determined.

    3-month

  • Wanded Telemetry Issues at Pre-discharge Follow-up

    The Investigators completed a questionnaire based on the performance of the wanded telemetry during device interrogations at pre-discharge follow-up. The number of problems reported were counted from the entire study cohort.

    Pre-Discharge visit occurred after implant but prior to 1 month follow-up visit

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the Daily Median Respiratory Rate Trend in Patients Who Experience a HF-event Compared to Patients Who do Not Experience a HF-event.

    Results were captured from implant time window to the first event for patients with HFE, up to an average of 9 months

Study Arms (1)

INCEPTA ICD and CRT-D

ICD and CRT-D indicated patients were included in the study. Overall patient population, CRT-D or ICD populations, and patients experiencing or not experiencing a protocol-defined heart failure event were included (dependent on outcomes measured).

Device: INCEPTA ICD or CRT-D

Interventions

INCEPTA ICD and CRT-D

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients should be selected from the investigator's general population and be indicated for an ICD or CRT-D implantation.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who are willing and capable of providing informed consent, undergoing a device implant, participating in all testing associated with this clinical study;
  • Patients whose age is 18 or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to national law
  • Patients indicated for an ICD according to normal clinical practice (for those patients receiving an INCEPTA ICD).
  • As soon as 20 ICD patients are included in the study for purpose I, only NYHA Class III patients will be allowed in the study.
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III patients indicated for a CRT-D according to normal clinical practice (for those patients receiving an INCEPTA CRT-D).

You may not qualify if:

  • Women of childbearing potential who are or might be pregnant at the time of the study (method of assessment upon physician's discretion)
  • Enrolled in any other concurrent study.
  • Inability or refusal to comply with the follow-up schedule
  • Patients that have received routinely scheduled intravenous inotropic therapy as part of their drug regimen within the past 90 days
  • Patients prescribed to positive airway pressure therapy
  • A life expectancy of less than 1 year, per physician discretion
  • Patient in NYHA Class IV during the last 4 weeks

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Death, Sudden, CardiacHeart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart ArrestHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesDeath, SuddenDeathPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Paji Vitoff, Senior Clinical Manager
Organization
Guidant, a Boston Scientific Company

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2010

First Posted

October 25, 2010

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

April 25, 2014

Results First Posted

April 8, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-04

Locations