Next Generation INCEPTA Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D) Field Following Study
NOTICE-HF
Next Generation INCEPTA ICD and CRT-D Field Following Study: Respiratory Rate Trend Evaluation in Heart Failure (HF) Patients
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study has 2 purposes: The first purpose of the study is to test a new family of Boston Scientific Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ("ICDs") and cardiac resynchronization therapy ICDs ("CRT-Ds") and show how well these new devices work in patients. This new family is called the INCEPTA ICD and the INCEPTA CRT-D. The second purpose of the study is to collect data from a feature that monitors breathing. It is called the Respiratory Rate Trend (RRT). These data will help to better understand how changes in breathing relate to changes in clinical conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2014
CompletedApril 25, 2014
April 1, 2014
1.2 years
October 22, 2010
December 11, 2013
April 9, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (36)
Clinical Performance for Left Ventricular (LV) Sensing Amplitude at Implant for CRT-D Patients
Left Ventricular (LV) Sensed Amplitude results were reported at implant for CRT-D patients.
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for LV Sensing Amplitude for CRT-D Patients
Left Ventricular (LV) Sensed Amplitude results were reported pre-discharge for CRT-D patients.
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at1-month for Left Ventricular (LV) Sensing Amplitude for CRT-D Patients
LV Sensed Amplitude results were reported at 1-month post-implant for CRT-D patients.
1-month
Clinical Performance at Implant for Right Atrium (RA) Sensing Amplitude
RA Sensed Amplitude results were reported for implant for CRT-D and ICD patients
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RA Sensing Amplitude
RA Sensed Amplitude results were reported at pre-discharge for CRT-D and ICD patients
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at1-month for RA Sensing Amplitude
RA Sensed Amplitude results were reported at 1-month post-implant for CRT-D and ICD patients
1-month
Clinical Performance at Implant for Right Ventricle (RV) Sensing Amplitude
RV Sensed Amplitude results were reported at implant for CRT-D and ICD patients
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for Right Ventricle (RV) Sensing Amplitude
RV Sensed Amplitude results were reported at pre-discharge for CRT-D and ICD patients
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at1-month for Right Ventricle (RV) Sensing Amplitude
RV Sensed Amplitude results were reported at 1-month post-implant for CRT-D and ICD patients
1month
Clinical Performance at Implant for LV Pacing Threshold
LV pacing threshold results were reported for CRT-D patients at implant.
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for LV Pacing Threshold
LV pacing threshold results were reported at pre-discharge for CRT-D patients.
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at1-month for LV Pacing Threshold
LV pacing threshold results were reported at 1-month post-implant for CRT-D patients.
1-month
Clinical Performance at Implant for RV Pacing Threshold
RV pacing threshold results were reported at implant
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RV Pacing Threshold
RV pacing threshold results were reported at pre-discharge
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at 1-month for RV Pacing Threshold
RV pacing threshold results were reported at 1-month post-implant
1-month
Clinical Performance at Implant for RA Pacing Threshold
RA pacing threshold results were reported for implant
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RA Pacing Threshold
RA pacing threshold results were reported at pre-discharge
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at 1-month for RA Pacing Threshold
RA pacing threshold results were reported at 1-month post-implant
1-month
Clinical Performance at Implant LV Pacing Impedance for CRT-D.
LV pacing impedance results at implant were measured in CRT-D.
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for LV Pacing Impedance for CRT-D.
LV pacing impedance results were reported for pre-discharge visit
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at 1-month for LV Pacing Impedance for CRT-D.
LV pacing impedance results were reported at 1-month post-implant
1-month
Clinical Performance at Implant for RV Pacing Impedance
RV pacing impedance results were reported at implant
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RV Pacing Impedance
RV pacing impedance results were reported for pre-discharge
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at 1-month for RV Pacing Impedance
RV pacing impedance results were reported at 1-month post-implant
1-month
Clinical Performance at Implant for RA Pacing Impedance
RA pacing impedance results were reported at implant
implant
Clinical Performance at Pre-discharge for RA Pacing Impedance
RA pacing impedance results were reported at pre-discharge
pre-discharge
Clinical Performance at 1-month for RA Pacing Impedance
RA pacing impedance results were reported at 1-month post-implant
1-month
Product Experiences Reported by the Site for All Patients for Study Duration
Product experiences reported may include the shock impedance noise display, problems encountered with the universal serial bus (USB), a program parameter mismatch, reverse mode switches, electrogram (EGM) noise without oversensing, lead connection issues, or customer device feedback.
Overall study results
Induced Ventricular Tachycardia / Ventricular Fibrillation (VT/VF) Episode Successful Conversion Rates at Implant
The % of successful conversions after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. All episodes of induced VT/VF that resolved with successful conversion were counted from the total attempted conversions and reported as the % of successful conversions from those attempted.
implant
Induced VT/VF Episode Successful Conversion Rates at 1-month
The % of successful conversions after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. All episodes of induced VT/VF that resolved with successful conversion were counted from the total attempted conversions and reported as the % of successful conversions from those attempted.
1-month
Induced VT/VF Episode Successful Conversion Rates at 3-months
The % of successful conversions after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. All episodes of induced VT/VF that resolved with successful conversion were counted from the total attempted conversions and reported as the % of successful conversions from those attempted.
3-month
Induced Episode Detection Times at Implant
The mean time it took to complete a successful conversion after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. The time was recorded (in seconds) for the time duration that was required to successfully convert the patient after inducing VT/VF.
implant
Induced Episode Detection Times at 1-month
The mean time it took to complete a successful conversion after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. The time was recorded (in seconds) for the time duration that was required to successfully convert the patient after inducing VT/VF.
1-month
Induced Episode Detection Times at 3 Months
The mean time it took to complete a successful conversion after inducing a VT/VF episode was analyzed for available data from CRT and ICD group patients. The time was recorded (in seconds) for the time duration that was required to successfully convert the patient after inducing VT/VF.
3-month
Spontaneous Episode Conversion Success Rate at 3 Months
Of the total patients that experienced a spontaneous episode, the % of patients with a spontaneous rhythm conversion that was successful was determined.
3-month
Wanded Telemetry Issues at Pre-discharge Follow-up
The Investigators completed a questionnaire based on the performance of the wanded telemetry during device interrogations at pre-discharge follow-up. The number of problems reported were counted from the entire study cohort.
Pre-Discharge visit occurred after implant but prior to 1 month follow-up visit
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the Daily Median Respiratory Rate Trend in Patients Who Experience a HF-event Compared to Patients Who do Not Experience a HF-event.
Results were captured from implant time window to the first event for patients with HFE, up to an average of 9 months
Study Arms (1)
INCEPTA ICD and CRT-D
ICD and CRT-D indicated patients were included in the study. Overall patient population, CRT-D or ICD populations, and patients experiencing or not experiencing a protocol-defined heart failure event were included (dependent on outcomes measured).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients should be selected from the investigator's general population and be indicated for an ICD or CRT-D implantation.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are willing and capable of providing informed consent, undergoing a device implant, participating in all testing associated with this clinical study;
- Patients whose age is 18 or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to national law
- Patients indicated for an ICD according to normal clinical practice (for those patients receiving an INCEPTA ICD).
- As soon as 20 ICD patients are included in the study for purpose I, only NYHA Class III patients will be allowed in the study.
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III patients indicated for a CRT-D according to normal clinical practice (for those patients receiving an INCEPTA CRT-D).
You may not qualify if:
- Women of childbearing potential who are or might be pregnant at the time of the study (method of assessment upon physician's discretion)
- Enrolled in any other concurrent study.
- Inability or refusal to comply with the follow-up schedule
- Patients that have received routinely scheduled intravenous inotropic therapy as part of their drug regimen within the past 90 days
- Patients prescribed to positive airway pressure therapy
- A life expectancy of less than 1 year, per physician discretion
- Patient in NYHA Class IV during the last 4 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Guidant Corporationlead
- University of Rochestercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paji Vitoff, Senior Clinical Manager
- Organization
- Guidant, a Boston Scientific Company
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2010
First Posted
October 25, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 25, 2014
Results First Posted
April 8, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04