The Efficacy of Automated Intermittent Boluses for Continuous Femoral Nerve Block: a Prospective, Randomized Comparison to Continuous Infusions
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The optimal infusion technique (continuous rate vs. intermittent bolus) for peripheral nerve blocks has not been established. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the efficacy of an automated intermittent bolus technique to a continuous rate of infusion of local anesthetic in femoral nerve catheters. We hypothesized that the intermittent bolus technique would provide enhanced analgesia compared to a continuous infusion rate as assessed by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) hydromorphone consumption and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2010
CompletedOctober 22, 2010
October 1, 2010
11 months
October 21, 2010
October 21, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia opioid consumption
Cumulative IV-PCA use was recorded until femoral nerve catheter removed on postoperative day 2.
Visual analog pain scale score
Preop; Immediately postoperatively in PACU; Postoperative day (POD) 0 at 8pm; POD 1 at 8am, 2pm & 8pm; POD 2 at 8am
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Visual analog scale patient satisfaction scores
POD 1 at 8am; POD 2 at 8am
Incidence of physician administered "rescue" boluses of the femoral nerve catheter
Hospital length of stay
Study Arms (1)
Continuous infusion rate
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 10.1 mL/hr via their femoral nerve catheter.
Interventions
Automated intermittent bolus delivery method of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL every 30 minutes with a basal infusion of 0.1 mL/hr.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 through 3
- elective, primary, unilateral TKA
You may not qualify if:
- patient refusal
- pregnancy
- diabetic neuropathy or any other neurologic or neuromuscular disease
- rheumatoid arthritis
- current coagulopathy
- skin infection at needle insertion site for the femoral or sciatic blocks
- significant renal or hepatic impairment
- unsuccessful femoral or sciatic block or femoral catheter placement
- femoral catheter dislodgement after placement
- inability to understand VAS pain scales
- inability to use an IV-PCA pump
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Related Publications (9)
Capdevila X, Barthelet Y, Biboulet P, Ryckwaert Y, Rubenovitch J, d'Athis F. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999 Jul;91(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199907000-00006.
PMID: 10422923BACKGROUNDChelly JE, Greger J, Gebhard R, Coupe K, Clyburn TA, Buckle R, Criswell A. Continuous femoral blocks improve recovery and outcome of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Jun;16(4):436-45. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.23622.
PMID: 11402405BACKGROUNDShum CF, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Chong HC, Yeo SN. Continuous femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: immediate and two-year outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Feb;24(2):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.014. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
PMID: 18534496BACKGROUNDLim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Oct;14(4):305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.004.
PMID: 16154735BACKGROUNDWong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):904-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a.
PMID: 16492849BACKGROUNDTaboada M, Rodriguez J, Bermudez M, Amor M, Ulloa B, Aneiros F, Sebate S, Cortes J, Alvarez J, Atanassoff PG. Comparison of continuous infusion versus automated bolus for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with popliteal sciatic nerve catheters. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jan;110(1):150-4. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318191693a.
PMID: 19104182BACKGROUNDFerrante FM, Orav EJ, Rocco AG, Gallo J. A statistical model for pain in patient-controlled analgesia and conventional intramuscular opioid regimens. Anesth Analg. 1988 May;67(5):457-61.
PMID: 3364765BACKGROUNDTaboada M, Rodriguez J, Bermudez M, Valino C, Ulloa B, Aneiros F, Gude F, Cortes J, Alvarez J, Atanassoff PG. A "new" automated bolus technique for continuous popliteal block: a prospective, randomized comparison with a continuous infusion technique. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1433-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181824164.
PMID: 18806065BACKGROUNDHillegass MG, Field LC, Stewart SR, Borckardt JJ, Dong L, Kotlowski PE, Demos HA, Del Schutte H, Reeves ST. The efficacy of automated intermittent boluses for continuous femoral nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison to continuous infusions. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Jun;25(4):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.11.015. Epub 2013 May 16.
PMID: 23685099DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Larry C. Field, M.D.
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2010
First Posted
October 22, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 22, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-10