NCT01225952

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the contrast sensitivity, high and low contrast visual acuity (VA), glare meter outcomes, and subject satisfaction with three different FDA-approved intraocular lenses (IOLs) designed to improve distance, intermediate, and near vision following lens extraction in adults at least 40 years of age.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
93

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 19, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2010

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2011

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 18, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2013

Status Verified

December 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

October 19, 2010

Results QC Date

August 31, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 11, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

phacoemulsificationintraocular lens

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare (1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree)

    A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.

    Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)

  • Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(6 Cycles/Degree)

    A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.

    Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)

  • Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(12 Cycles/Degree)

    A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.

    Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)

  • Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(18 Cycles/Degree)

    A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.

    Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)

  • Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree)

    A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.

    Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)

  • Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(6 Cycles/Degree)

    A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.

    Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)

  • Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(12 Cycles/Degree)

    A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.

    Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)

  • Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(18 Cycles/Degree)

    A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.

    Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree)

    Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(6 Cycles/Degree)

    Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(12 Cycles/Degree)

    Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(18 Cycles/Degree)

    Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree)

    Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Crystalens AO

EXPERIMENTAL

Bausch \& Lomb silicone multi-piece accommodating IOL is a modified plate haptic lens

Device: Crystalens AO

ReSTOR 3.0

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

An aspheric multifocal IOL (Alcon Laboratories) combines the functions of an apodized diffractive region and a refractive region.

Device: ReSTOR 3.0

AMO Tecnis Multifocal

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A foldable hydrophobic acrylic IOL,(Abbott Medical Optics), is an ultraviolet light-absorbing posterior chamber IOL

Device: AMO Tecnis Multifocal

Interventions

Bausch \& Lomb model silicone multi-piece accommodating IOL.

Crystalens AO

An aspheric multifocal IOL (Alcon Laboratories) combines the functions of an apodized diffractive region and a refractive region.

ReSTOR 3.0

The Tecnis Multifocal foldable hydrophobic acrylic IOL, Model ZMA00 (Abbott Medical Optics), is an ultraviolet light-absorbing posterior chamber IOL.

AMO Tecnis Multifocal

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must be undergoing primary IOL implantation for the correction of aphakia following continuous curvilinear anterior capsulotomy and phacoemulsification cataract extraction.
  • Subjects must require a spherical lens power from 10.00 diopters (D) to 33.00 D.
  • Subjects must have the potential for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/32 or better in both eyes.
  • Subjects must have stopped contact lens wear for at least two weeks for soft lens wearers or three weeks for gas permeable lens wearers prior to biometry and surgery.
  • At the time of surgery, subjects must have an intact centered capsulorhexis, intact posterior capsule, and no zonular rupture.
  • Subjects must have ≤ 1.25 D of preoperative corneal astigmatism in both eyes.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with diagnoses of degenerative visual disorders (eg, macular degeneration, or other retinal disorders) that cause potential acuity losses to a level of 20/32 or worse.
  • Subjects with conditions with increased risk of zonular rupture, such as pseudoexfoliation syndrome.
  • Subjects who have any active inflammation or edema (swelling) of the cornea, including but not limited to the following: keratitis, keratoconjunctivitis, and keratouveitis.
  • Subjects with uncontrolled glaucoma.
  • Subjects with previous retinal detachment.
  • Subjects with visually significant diabetic retinopathy (proliferative or nonproliferative) which reduces potential acuity to 20/32 or worse.
  • Subjects with rubella, bilateral congenital, traumatic, complicated or polar cataract.
  • Subjects with marked microphthalmos or aniridia.
  • Subjects who have had previous corneal surgery.
  • Subjects with irregular corneal astigmatism.
  • Subjects with amblyopia which reduces potential acuity to 20/32 or worse.
  • Subjects with optic atrophy.
  • Subjects with iris neovascularization.
  • Subjects with clinically significant retinal pigment epithelium/macular changes which reduces potential acuity to 20/32 or worse.
  • Subjects with chronic use of systemic steroids or immunosuppressive medications.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Asian Eye Institute

Makati City, 1200, Philippines

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lens DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Omid Khodai, OD,RAC
Organization
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study Officials

  • Tes Ignacio, MD

    Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2010

First Posted

October 21, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion

June 1, 2011

Study Completion

July 1, 2011

Last Updated

January 18, 2013

Results First Posted

January 18, 2013

Record last verified: 2012-12

Locations