Three Intraocular Lenses Designed to Improve Distance, Intermediate and Near Vision Following Lens Extraction
A Three Arm Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Three FDA-approved Intraocular Lenses Designed to Improve Distance, Intermediate and Near Vision Following Lens Extraction
1 other identifier
interventional
93
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the contrast sensitivity, high and low contrast visual acuity (VA), glare meter outcomes, and subject satisfaction with three different FDA-approved intraocular lenses (IOLs) designed to improve distance, intermediate, and near vision following lens extraction in adults at least 40 years of age.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 18, 2013
CompletedJanuary 18, 2013
December 1, 2012
11 months
October 19, 2010
August 31, 2012
December 11, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare (1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree)
A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.
Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(6 Cycles/Degree)
A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.
Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(12 Cycles/Degree)
A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.
Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(18 Cycles/Degree)
A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.
Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree)
A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.
Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(6 Cycles/Degree)
A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.
Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(12 Cycles/Degree)
A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.
Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(18 Cycles/Degree)
A single eye (monocular) in dim light (mesopic) measuring contrast sensitivity; The participant is presented with a sine-wave grating target of a given spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) where the smaller the number of cycles/degree the wider apart the gradations (vertical lines of grayness). The participant's ability to detect changes in contrast is determined. Higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity.
Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree)
Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(6 Cycles/Degree)
Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(12 Cycles/Degree)
Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(18 Cycles/Degree)
Postoperative visit 3 (day 30-60)
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare(1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree)
Postoperative visit 4 (day 120-180)
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Crystalens AO
EXPERIMENTALBausch \& Lomb silicone multi-piece accommodating IOL is a modified plate haptic lens
ReSTOR 3.0
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn aspheric multifocal IOL (Alcon Laboratories) combines the functions of an apodized diffractive region and a refractive region.
AMO Tecnis Multifocal
ACTIVE COMPARATORA foldable hydrophobic acrylic IOL,(Abbott Medical Optics), is an ultraviolet light-absorbing posterior chamber IOL
Interventions
An aspheric multifocal IOL (Alcon Laboratories) combines the functions of an apodized diffractive region and a refractive region.
The Tecnis Multifocal foldable hydrophobic acrylic IOL, Model ZMA00 (Abbott Medical Optics), is an ultraviolet light-absorbing posterior chamber IOL.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must be undergoing primary IOL implantation for the correction of aphakia following continuous curvilinear anterior capsulotomy and phacoemulsification cataract extraction.
- Subjects must require a spherical lens power from 10.00 diopters (D) to 33.00 D.
- Subjects must have the potential for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/32 or better in both eyes.
- Subjects must have stopped contact lens wear for at least two weeks for soft lens wearers or three weeks for gas permeable lens wearers prior to biometry and surgery.
- At the time of surgery, subjects must have an intact centered capsulorhexis, intact posterior capsule, and no zonular rupture.
- Subjects must have ≤ 1.25 D of preoperative corneal astigmatism in both eyes.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with diagnoses of degenerative visual disorders (eg, macular degeneration, or other retinal disorders) that cause potential acuity losses to a level of 20/32 or worse.
- Subjects with conditions with increased risk of zonular rupture, such as pseudoexfoliation syndrome.
- Subjects who have any active inflammation or edema (swelling) of the cornea, including but not limited to the following: keratitis, keratoconjunctivitis, and keratouveitis.
- Subjects with uncontrolled glaucoma.
- Subjects with previous retinal detachment.
- Subjects with visually significant diabetic retinopathy (proliferative or nonproliferative) which reduces potential acuity to 20/32 or worse.
- Subjects with rubella, bilateral congenital, traumatic, complicated or polar cataract.
- Subjects with marked microphthalmos or aniridia.
- Subjects who have had previous corneal surgery.
- Subjects with irregular corneal astigmatism.
- Subjects with amblyopia which reduces potential acuity to 20/32 or worse.
- Subjects with optic atrophy.
- Subjects with iris neovascularization.
- Subjects with clinically significant retinal pigment epithelium/macular changes which reduces potential acuity to 20/32 or worse.
- Subjects with chronic use of systemic steroids or immunosuppressive medications.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Asian Eye Institute
Makati City, 1200, Philippines
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Omid Khodai, OD,RAC
- Organization
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tes Ignacio, MD
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2010
First Posted
October 21, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
January 18, 2013
Results First Posted
January 18, 2013
Record last verified: 2012-12