NCT01122576

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and subject satisfaction with three different FDA approved lenses for adults over 40 years of age who desire a reduction in spectacle dependence.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2010

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 11, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2010

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2010

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2012

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 28, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

March 28, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

May 11, 2010

Results QC Date

September 13, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 12, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Intra Ocular LensOcular surgeryPhacoemulsification

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5 and 3 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 3 (2-3 months)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 6 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 3 (2-3 months)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 12 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 3 (2-3 months)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 18 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 3 (2-3 months)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 4 ( 4-6 months)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 3 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 4 ( 4-6 months)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 6 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 4 ( 4-6 months)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 12 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 4 ( 4-6 months)

  • Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 18 Cycles/Degree

    Logarithm of the mesopic (low light) contrast sensitivity (ability to detect detail with subtle gradations of grayness between test target and background) without glare at five spatial frequencies (number of light and dark bars per cycle). A higher mean indicates improved contrast sensitivity

    Postoperative visit 4 ( 4-6 months)

Secondary Outcomes (35)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5 & 3 Cycles/Degree

    Visit 3 (2-3 months)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 6 Cycles/Degree

    Visit 3 (2-3 months)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 12 Cycles/Degree

    Visit 3 (2-3 months)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 18 Cycles/Degree

    Visit 3 (2-3 months)

  • Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5, 3, 6 Cycles/Degree

    Visit 4 (4-6 months)

  • +30 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Crystalens AO

EXPERIMENTAL

Eligible subjects to undergo small incision cataract surgery and were implanted with the Crystalens AO bilaterally.

Device: Crystalens AO

ReSTOR

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Eligible subjects to undergo small incision cataract surgery and were implanted with the ReSTOR IOL bilaterally.

Device: ReSTOR

Tecnis Multifocal IOL

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Eligible subjects to undergo small incision cataract surgery and were implanted with the Tecnis Multifocal IOL bilaterally.

Device: Tecnis Multifocal IOL

Interventions

Crystalens AO surgically implanted bilaterally. Study observation up to 180 days.

Crystalens AO
ReSTORDEVICE

ReSTOR surgically implanted bilaterally. Study observation up to 180 days.

ReSTOR

Tecnis surgically implanted bilaterally. Study observation up to 180 days.

Tecnis Multifocal IOL

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must have a clinically documented diagnosis of age-related bilateral cataracts that are considered amenable to treatment with standard phacoemulsification cataract extraction.
  • Subjects must require a spherical lens power from 10.00 D to 33.00 D
  • Subjects must have the potential for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/32 or better in both eyes, as documented by a Potential Acuity Meter

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with conditions with increased risk of zonular rupture, such as pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Zonular rupture during cataract surgery may affect postoperative centration, tilt, and stability of the lens.
  • Subjects who have any active inflammation or edema (swelling) of the cornea, including but not limited to the following: keratitis, keratoconjunctivitis, and keratouveitis.
  • Subjects with visually significant diabetic retinopathy (proliferative or non-proliferative) which reduces potential acuity to 20/32 or worse.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bausch & Lomb, Inc

Aliso Viejo, California, 92656, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lens DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Quintus Ngumah, OD, PhD
Organization
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study Officials

  • Omid Khodai, OD, RAC

    Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2010

First Posted

May 13, 2010

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion

June 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2012

Last Updated

March 28, 2014

Results First Posted

March 28, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-02

Locations