NCT01218542

Brief Summary

Brain metastases are the most common adult intracranial tumor, occurring in approximately 10% to 30% of adult cancer patients, and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The most widely used treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases is whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The use of WBRT after resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proven to be effective in terms of improving local control of brain metastases. RapidArc (RA) (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) is a new method of delivering radiation that uses "arcs" to deliver highly conformal intensity modulated three dimensional dose distributions. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate an alternative strategy for giving WBRT with highly focal boost to gross visible lesions in patients with brain metastasis. Given the limitations of the SRS boost technique, the purpose of our investigation is to evaluate an alternative strategy for giving WBRT with highly focal boost to gross visible lesions in patients with brain metastasis. In this study, we plan to assess the tolerability of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) on patients with brain metastasis to simultaneously treat the entire brain with a concomitant focal boost to grossly identified lesions on MRI scan to try to improve local control and reduce neurocognitive toxicities. This previous version of this study was a phase I dose escalation trial giving 25 Gy in 10 fractions to the whole brain with simultaneous infield boost (SIB) to a total of 45 Gy in 10 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease. Prior to this, patients were enrolled onto one of two cohorts with whole brain dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions with SIB to total of 45 Gy in 10 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease or whole brain dose of 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with SIB to total of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease. A total of 12 patients have been previously enrolled on this trial. No patients have experienced a dose limiting toxicity (grade 3 or above) at least possibly due to study therapy. Also, no patients experienced local brain failure/progression at a site of treated metastatic brain disease. Based on this, we no longer feel that dose escalation to the gross brain disease is warranted and would proceed with a single arm pilot study treating patients with 25 Gy in 10 fractions to the whole brain with simultaneous infield boost (SIB) to a total of 45 Gy in 10 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 22, 2010

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2010

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 11, 2010

Completed
9.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 3, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 3, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 29, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 29, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

9.7 years

First QC Date

September 30, 2010

Results QC Date

June 26, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 25, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Secondary brain malignanciesRapidArcVolumetric modulated arc therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent of Participants With Locoregional Control of Treating Brain Metastasis Patients

    The cumulative incidences of recurrence locally and in the whole brain were reported at the patient level.

    Locoregional control at 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Brain Progression-free Survival

    11 months median follow up period.

  • Overall Survival

    11 months median follow up period.

  • Neurocognitive Effects

    11 months median follow up period.

  • Quality of Life as Measured by the FACT-Br Subscales

    11 month median follow up

Study Arms (1)

Volumetric modulated arc therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Single arm pilot study treating patients with 25 Gy in 10 fractions to the whole brain with simultaneous infield boost (SIB) to a total of 45 Gy in 10 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease.

Radiation: Volumetric modulated arc therapy

Interventions

Using volumetric modulated arc therapy to give simultaneous infield boost to gross metastatic brain lesions during whole brain radiation therapy.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pathologic proven diagnosis of solid tumor malignancy.
  • Age ≥ 18.
  • KPS ≥ 70.
  • Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) ≥ 18 prior to study entry.
  • RPA class I (KPS ≥ 70, primary cancer controlled, age \< 65, metastases in brain only) or class II (lack of one or more of class I criteria).
  • One to ten brain metastatic lesions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous whole brain radiation therapy.
  • Previous radiosurgery to any currently progressive gross metastatic disease.
  • Previous radiosurgery to any intracranial site within the prior 6 weeks.
  • Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class III (KPS \< 70).
  • Radiosensitive (eg. small cell lung carcinomas, germ cell tumors, leukemias, or lymphomas) or unknown tumor histologies.
  • Concurrent chemotherapy (no chemotherapy starting 14 days before start of radiation).
  • Evidence of leptomeningeal disease by MRI and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology.
  • Current pregnancy.
  • No metastases to brain stem, midbrain, pons, or medulla or within 7 mm of the optic apparatus (optic nerves and chiasm).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Emory University Hospital Midtown

Atlanta, Georgia, 30308, United States

Location

Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Zimm S, Wampler GL, Stablein D, Hazra T, Young HF. Intracerebral metastases in solid-tumor patients: natural history and results of treatment. Cancer. 1981 Jul 15;48(2):384-94. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810715)48:23.0.co;2-8.

    PMID: 7237407BACKGROUND
  • Sundstrom JT, Minn H, Lertola KK, Nordman E. Prognosis of patients treated for intracranial metastases with whole-brain irradiation. Ann Med. 1998 Jun;30(3):296-9. doi: 10.3109/07853899809005858.

    PMID: 9677016BACKGROUND
  • CHAO JH, PHILLIPS R, NICKSON JJ. Roentgen-ray therapy of cerebral metastases. Cancer. 1954 Jul;7(4):682-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195407)7:43.0.co;2-s. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13172684BACKGROUND
  • Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M, Asbell S, Phillips T, Wasserman T, McKenna WG, Byhardt R. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Mar 1;37(4):745-51. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00619-0.

    PMID: 9128946BACKGROUND
  • Patchell RA, Regine WF. The rationale for adjuvant whole brain radiation therapy with radiosurgery in the treatment of single brain metastases. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Apr;2(2):111-5. doi: 10.1177/153303460300200206.

    PMID: 12680791BACKGROUND
  • Arbit E, Wronski M, Burt M, Galicich JH. The treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastases. A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 1995 Sep 1;76(5):765-73. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950901)76:53.0.co;2-e.

    PMID: 8625178BACKGROUND
  • Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, Flanders AE, Gaspar LE, Schell MC, Werner-Wasik M, Demas W, Ryu J, Bahary JP, Souhami L, Rotman M, Mehta MP, Curran WJ Jr. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1665-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16250-8.

    PMID: 15158627BACKGROUND
  • Lagerwaard FJ, van der Hoorn EA, Verbakel WF, Haasbeek CJ, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Whole-brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost to multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.029. Epub 2009 Jul 4.

    PMID: 19577856BACKGROUND
  • Bauman G, Yartsev S, Fisher B, Kron T, Laperriere N, Heydarian M, VanDyk J. Simultaneous infield boost with helical tomotherapy for patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb;30(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000245473.41035.c4.

    PMID: 17278893BACKGROUND
  • Zhong J, Waldman AD, Kandula S, Eaton BR, Prabhu RS, Huff SB, Shu HG. Outcomes of whole-brain radiation with simultaneous in-field boost (SIB) for the treatment of brain metastases. J Neurooncol. 2020 Mar;147(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03405-y. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasm Metastasis

Interventions

Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplastic ProcessesNeoplasmsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapyTherapeutics

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Hui-Kuo Shu
Organization
Emory University

Study Officials

  • Hui-Kuo Shu, MD, PhD

    Emory University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2010

First Posted

October 11, 2010

Study Start

September 22, 2010

Primary Completion

June 3, 2020

Study Completion

June 3, 2020

Last Updated

June 29, 2021

Results First Posted

June 29, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations