Cutting Balloon Study
CB
Safety and Efficacy of the Cutting Balloon to Treat Resistant Pulmonary Artery Stenosis
2 other identifiers
interventional
73
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter Cutting Balloon therapy for branch pulmonary artery stenosis resistant to low pressure dilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 17, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 25, 2018
CompletedMay 25, 2018
April 1, 2018
5.6 years
September 17, 2010
April 18, 2017
April 25, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Acute Change in Minimum Lumen Diameter Immediately Post-intervention
The primary efficacy outcome is the percent change in minimum lumen diameter from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention as measured by angiography.
Pre-intervention to immediate post-intervention (approximately 10 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change in Minimum Lumen Diameter at 3 Months Post-intervention
3 months post-intervention
Study Arms (1)
Patients with Resistant Pulmonary Artery Stenosis
EXPERIMENTALVessels with resistant PA stenosis were identified during catheterization and eligible vessels were randomized to Cutting Balloon or High Pressure Balloon Dilation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a. At least 1 branch pulmonary artery stenosis referred for planned catheterization for PA dilation b. At least one of the following: i.greater than one half systemic right ventricular pressure ii. regional decrease in pulmonary blood flow by lung scan iii. elevated pulmonary artery pressures (\> 20 mmHg MPAP) iv. cyanosis at least in part due to PA stenosis c. Informed consent of patient and/or parent/guardian; assent of mature minors d. Agreement to participate in protocol, including follow-up testing
- Native pulmonary artery or branch which fails balloon dilation up to 8 ATM; as defined by failure to eliminate a waist
- Native pulmonary artery or branch with a balloon waist diameter less than 7.5 mm (i.e.,0.5 mm less than the largest available CB) with dilation at 8 ATM
- All eligible vessels that are dilated during the catheterization must be enrolled as study vessels; "off-study" use of Cutting Balloons or high pressure dilations in eligible vessels is not allowed.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior pulmonary artery angioplasty or surgery on the vessel within the previous 6 weeks
- Pregnancy
- Vessel with an aneurysm from a prior dilation or surgery, defined as a local enlargement of the vessel greater than 100% of the lumen diameter both proximally and distally to the aneurysm. The maximum aneurysm diameter and vessel lumen diameter proximal and distal to the aneurysm will be recorded. The location of the aneurysm relative to the angioplasty site will be determined and reported as proximal, distal, or in the region of waist formation.
- Prior stent placement associated with the obstruction
- i. balloon inflation for the purpose of expanding the diameter of the stent along its length with no residual waist proximal or distal to the stent edges ii. balloon inflation resulting in waist formation within the edges of a stent iii. dilation of a vessel through the cells of a stent c. Unifocalized nor non-unifocalized systemic to pulmonary artery collaterals. d. A vessel requiring therapy at a site not amenable to delivery or safe positioning of a Cutting Balloon device due to unfavorable anatomy as determined by the physician and based on as assessment of vessel angles, size, length, and proximity to other vessels.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143-0130, United States
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Children's Hospital, Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4399, United States
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kathy Jenkins MD MPH
- Organization
- Boston Childrens Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathy Jenkins, MD, MPH
Boston Children's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Pediatrics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2010
First Posted
September 20, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2003
Primary Completion
March 17, 2009
Study Completion
September 9, 2009
Last Updated
May 25, 2018
Results First Posted
May 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04