Study Stopped
Funding agency withdrew funding due to slow recruitment
Methadone in Neuropathic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
3
Brief Summary
INTRODUCTION: There is an important need for inexpensive drugs that treat neuropathic pain. Early research suggests that methadone may be a good, inexpensive drug to treat neuropathic pain. Methadone is available in a low cost powder that is easily prepared for different routes of administration. This study will look at the effect and safety of methadone compared to the regular treatment of morphine for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. OBJECTIVES: First the investigators want to determine if methadone is effective and safe for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Since a placebo control group would be unethical, the proposed comparator will consist of the "gold standard" conventional treatment, controlled release morphine. The investigators will compare methadone to controlled-release morphine with regard to how it affects the level of pain and extent of side effects. Next the investigators want to examine safety as well as to determine whether methadone leads to improvements in physical and emotional functioning, and participants' satisfaction with the treatment. METHODS: A double blind, randomized trial comparing methadone and controlled release morphine is proposed. After 1-week, participants will be randomly assigned to either methadone or controlled release morphine and will gradually build to a dose at which they receive adequate pain relief without unacceptable levels of side effects. This 5-week phase will be followed by a 6-week dose phase and then a 4-week tapering off phase. Study drug: The study drug is methadone supplied in 2.5 mg tablets. The comparator will consist of controlled release morphine in 10 mg tablets. The dose of each will range from 1-12 tablets taken every 12 hours (dose ranges methadone 5-60 mg/day, controlled release morphine 20-240 mg/day). Setting: This is a 3-site study involving pain clinics in Halifax, Nova Scotia; London, Ontario; and Calgary, Alberta.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_4
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 28, 2021
July 1, 2017
4.9 years
September 17, 2010
January 26, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
to determine if methadone is an effective opioid for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain
16 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Methadone
EXPERIMENTALControlled Release Morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORControlled release morphine supplied in 10 mg tablets, 1-12 tablets taken twice daily, every 12 hours (range 20-240 mg per 24 hours).
Interventions
Patients in the methadone arm will be supplied with 2.5 mg tablets. The dose will consist of 1-12 tablets taken twice daily, every 12 hours (range 5-60 mg per 24 hours).
controlled release morphine supplied in 10 mg tablets, 1-12 tablets taken twice daily, every 12 hours (range 20-240 mg per 24 hours).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than18 years
- Chronic neuropathic pain of central or peripheral origin for 3 months or longer as determined by the study physician and a score of 4/10 or greater on the DN4
- Moderate to severe pain as defined by average 7-day pain score of greater than 4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale for pain intensity (NRS-PI).
- Physician has identified that an opioid is a valid adjunctive treatment for the chronic neuropathic pain.
- Concomitant non-opioid analgesic medications must have been stable for 14 days.
- Co-interventions such as TENS, acupuncture and massage must have been stable for 14 days prior to the trial
- If taking an opioid, maximum dose of opioid in oral morphine equivalents (OME) is 90 mg/24 hours.
- Ability to follow the protocol with reference to cognitive and situational conditions; e.g., stable housing, able to attend follow-up visits.
- Willing and able to give written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients on a dose of opioid that exceeds 90 mg/24 hours in OME
- Pregnant or lactating women (women of childbearing potential must have negative pregnancy test)
- History of psychosis
- History of (within the past 2 years) , or current, substance dependency disorder
- Excluded medications are listed in Appendix 1.
- Presence of clinically significant cardiac or pulmonary disorder on physical exam that would compromise participants' safety in the trial as judged by the study physician.
- Presence of significant conduction delay, ischemia or arrhythmia on screening ECG
- Presence of severe pain disorder other than the chronic neuropathic pain under study that would interfere with patient's ability to determine effect of study treatment on the chronic neuropathic pain
- Abnormalities above 1.5 times upper range of normal on screening CBC, blood chemistry including BUN, Cr, LDH, AST, ALT
- Patients with a history of allergy to any opioid.
- Participation in another clinical trial in the 30 days prior to enrolment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nova Scotia Health Authoritylead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- Nova Scotia Health Research Foundationcollaborator
- Dalhousie Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (3)
QEII Health Science Centre Pain Management Unit
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
St. Joseph's Health Care Centre, Neuropathic Pain Clinic
London, Ontario, N6A4L6, Canada
Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3G1A4, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Lynch M, Moulin D, Perez J. Methadone vs. morphine SR for treatment of neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled trial and the challenges in recruitment. Can J Pain. 2019 Oct 22;3(1):180-189. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2019.1660575. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 35005408RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD FRCPC
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2010
First Posted
September 20, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2017-07